Yet Another Shooter??

[Royell Storing]

There is no Darnell photo of a motorcycle cop walking down the Elm Street extension.
Now do the math.

    How many times must I correct you on Rudimentary FACTS regarding the JFK Assassination?  FACT: (1) It's the Darnell FILM, and (2) There is Darnell Footage of an alleged Motorcycle Cop walking down the Elm Ext toward the TSBD. And this is continuous Darnell footage that tracks the same alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop walking across the train yard behind Officer Roger Craig. 

[Dan O'meara]

    How many times must I correct you on Rudimentary FACTS regarding the JFK Assassination?  FACT: (1) It's the Darnell FILM, and (2) There is Darnell Footage of an alleged Motorcycle Cop walking down the Elm Ext toward the TSBD. And this is continuous Darnell footage that tracks the same alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop walking across the train yard behind Officer Roger Craig.

Where can I see this footage because I've never seen it and would really like to.
Is there any other forum member who can help with that?

[Royell Storing]

Where can I see this footage because I've never seen it and would really like to.
Is there any other forum member who can help with that?

  Just go over to You Tube and use the Darnell Films that are posted by "The JFK Theorist". He has (2) Darnell Films posted over there. Both postings are really good and include the snippet with the No Hat Cop behind Sitzman.    You're Welcome..................................Again

[Steve Barber]

  Just go over to You Tube and use the Darnell Films that are posted by "The JFK Theorist". He has (2) Darnell Films posted over there. Both postings are really good and include the snippet with the No Hat Cop behind Sitzman.    You're Welcome..................................Again

 Where is your proof/evidence that the man captured in a few frames walking behind Marilyn Sitzman is a "cop"?
 
  What is your proof that Clyde Haygood is not the motorcycle officer in the railroad yard footage walking south?

  Also...You "asked" me to share my best copy of the Darnell footage showing the man in question behind Sitzman whom you refer to as "No hat cop".  I'm not at liberty to share my copy of the film or any individual frames from it.   

[Steve Barber]

  Storing could have at least provided you with  the link:

   By the way, Dan, you are correct about Haygood.  He is the "Unidentified" motorcycle officer walking south in the parking lot behind the knoll at 23:24 in this Darnell copy..

[Royell Storing]

    Steve - I laid this out previously, but just for You, I will go over ALL of it again. Haygood gave WC Testimony. During his testimony the WC lawyer asked him about a 12:35 radio transmission he made from his motorcycle regarding getting cops over to the TSBD. Haygood verified that he did remember making that 12:35 radio transmission from his motorcycle. The attorney also questioned Haygood about a 12:37 transmission he made from his motorcycle and Haygood once again confirmed having made this transmission also. The numerous video images of (1) Haygood riding down Elm St, (2) straightening his dumped motor at the curb, (3) running across the Knoll, and then (4) pictured standing atop the Triple Underpass, give us a pretty good elapsed time BEFORE he even got on the top of the Triple Underpass. My estimate is roughly 2 Minutes time had elapsed following the Kill Shot (12:35) when Haygood managed to climb atop the Triple Underpass. This leaves roughly 3 minutes for Haygood  to arrive at/search the train yard and be back at his motorcycle to make that 12:35 radio transmission that HE verified making during his WC Testimony. The alleged motorcycle cop that we see on the Darnell Film shadowing Officer Roger Craig, (1) WALKS across the entire train yard, and (2) then WALKS down the Elm St Ext toward the TSBD. This alleged motorcycle cop still has to travel down Elm St, (on foot), to the Ft Worth sign to make that 12:35 radio transmission from his motorcycle. It is physically impossible to: (1) travel from the top of the Triple Underpass to the Train Yard, (2) WALK across the train yard, (3) WALK down the entire Elm St Ext, and (4) ON FOOT, travel down Elm St amidst the pandemonium and reach the Ft Worth Sign in ONLY 3 MINUTES time. It's physically impossible to do all of this at a walking pace as seen on the Darnell Film. Either this is a still unknown DPD motorcycle cop, or a Bogus Motorcycle Cop. One or the other. One thing is for sure. It ain't Haygood   

[Royell Storing]

Where is your proof/evidence that the man captured in a few frames walking behind Marilyn Sitzman is a "cop"?
 
  What is your proof that Clyde Haygood is not the motorcycle officer in the railroad yard footage walking south?

  Also...You "asked" me to share my best copy of the Darnell footage showing the man in question behind Sitzman whom you refer to as "No hat cop".  I'm not at liberty to share my copy of the film or any individual frames from it.

   You claim it is, "MY copy of the film"? If it is yours, then you have every right to SHARE it or any portion of it. This is a major problem with the ongoing effort to solve this case. Too many people have and continue to HOARD INFORMATION. The more eyes and minds that are aimed at solving this case, the sooner it will be resolved one way or the other.  "Don't BOGART That Joint" rings true here.

[Steve Barber]

   You claim it is, "MY copy of the film"? If it is yours, then you have every right to SHARE it or any portion of it. This is a major problem with the ongoing effort to solve this case. Too many people have and continue to HOARD INFORMATION. The more eyes and minds that are aimed at solving this case, the sooner it will be resolved one way or the other.  "Don't BOGART That Joint" rings true here.

 You can whine and carry on all you want, Storing.  Here, Let me put it into words that a child would understand.  In my saying the words  "My copy" it's another way of saying the copy that I have from an un named source pointed out intructions to me not to do this and that with the copy.   The fact that you think I--or anyone else--should go against the wishes of someone who shares something with another under certain circumstances, this means that you are not one never to be trusted.  However, I already know you're not one to be trusted because of the things you say and do in your posts.  Alas, I'm only obeying what I was told, and if you don't like it, TOUGH!  Live with it and move on because I'm not violating anyones trust for the likes of you!