Oswald's Escape Route Time Trial

[John Mytton]

Books in the old format probably won't exist in the next couple of decades. It will all be on the internet.
Data may be lost from time to time, like McAdams' website, but all the information will never be erased at the same time.

I'm sorry that you don't like that.

Don't be sorry, the history written by reputable forensic scientist's of every type imaginable, is already recorded and thousands of copies still exist!









JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Don't be sorry, the history written by reputable forensic scientist's of every type imaginable, is already recorded and thousands of copies still exist!

JohnM

So much desperation. I really feel for you, John.

and thousands of copies still exist!

Yes, and they are gathering dust in some dark corners of a few libraries.... 

And isn't it ironic that when an LN is told that the majority of people do not believe the official story, they always respond with the claim that those people are clueless and do not know the evidence?

[Bill Brown]

So much desperation. I really feel for you, John.

and thousands of copies still exist!

Yes, and they are gathering dust in some dark corners of a few libraries.... 

And isn't it ironic that when an LN is told that the majority of people do not believe the official story, they always respond with the claim that those people are clueless and do not know the evidence?

I would bet any amount of money that a very large percentage (probably close to 98%) of those who vote (in some meaningless poll somewhere) that there was a conspiracy to kill Kennedy have never heard of names like Marina, J.D. Tippit, Ruth Paine, Edwin Walker, Buell Frazier, etc. These people have never heard of items like the paper bag, the blanket, shell casings, palm prints on boxes, etc.

These people have only heard of the magic bullet and the grassy knoll.  Period.

Therefore, their opinions on whether or not there was a conspiracy are absolutely meaningless.  Surely you understand this.  Right?

[Martin Weidmann]

I would bet any amount of money that a very large percentage (probably close to 98%) of those who vote (in some meaningless poll somewhere) that there was a conspiracy to kill Kennedy have never heard of names like Marina, J.D. Tippit, Ruth Paine, Edwin Walker, Buell Frazier, etc. These people have never heard of items like the paper bag, the blanket, shell casings, palm prints on boxes, etc.

These people have only heard of the magic bullet and the grassy knoll.  Period.

Therefore, their opinions on whether or not there was a conspiracy are absolutely meaningless.  Surely you understand this.  Right?

I understand and even agree. But John Mytton's argument was that the official narrative would always be in the History Books from now until the end of time!
The points I made was that the counter arguments would also survive on the internet and that hardly anybody reads the Warren Report.

You just made that last point for me! 

[John Mytton]

I understand and even agree. But John Mytton's argument was that the official narrative would always be that the official narrative would be the History Books from now until the end of time!
The points I made was that the counter arguments would also survive on the internet and that hardly anybody reads the Warren Report.

You just made that last point for me! 

You just made that last point for me!

Huh? That the vast majority of the population of the entire World doesn't know squat about the Assassination? And that's your point? WOW!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Huh? That the vast majority of the population of the entire World doesn't know squat about the Assassination? And that's your point? WOW!

JohnM

I'm sorry John, if you don't understand what I am saying.

If you ask me nicely, I may try to explain it to you again. OK?

[Bill Brown]

I understand and even agree. But John Mytton's argument was that the official narrative would always be in the History Books from now until the end of time!
The points I made was that the counter arguments would also survive on the internet and that hardly anybody reads the Warren Report.

You just made that last point for me! 

The points I made was that the counter arguments would also survive on the internet and that hardly anybody reads the Warren Report.

You just made that last point for me! 

Well yeah.  Hell, probably 98% of conspiracy advocates who actually take the time to post in JFK assassination internet forums haven't bothered to read the Warren Report.

[Martin Weidmann]

Well yeah.  Hell, probably 98% of conspiracy advocates who actually take the time to post in JFK assassination internet forums haven't bothered to read the Warren Report.

That may or may not be true, but I wonder how many LNs haven't read the Warren Report either. I do agree that many CTs have indeed not read the Report and the major part of all conspiracy theories originate from highly questionable websites.

As far as I am concerned, I not only have read the Warren Report, but it's the only book I have ever read about the assassination.
It was in fact the Warren Report itself that convinced me that the official narrative as presented in the books was questionable.