From Behind the Fence

[Royell Storing]

The single bullet topic is a FACT, no matter how many times you deny it, it's still a fact until you and every other doubter can prove where the bullet went that exited President Kennedy's throat went upon exit if, as you claim, it didn't wound Governor Connally.  You have no proof, and never will, because the bullet entered Governor Connally's back sideways because the bullet tumbled once it exited President Kennedy's throat.  The scar on Connally's was oval which proves that it had tumbled after exiting the president's throat.  During the life of the HSCA, G. Robert Blakey asked the Governor to remove his shirt so he could see the scar on his back.  Blakey describes it as being in the shape of the bullet-oblong- which proves the bullet entered the governor sideways, not straight in.  Blakey describes his meeting with Governor, as well as the single bullet with Burt Griffin at 1:04:33 during a discussion of the bullet within this documentary Truth Is The Only Client released in 2019.
 

        You claim the SBT to be Fact, and then submit HEAR SAY to corroborate it? Really? Did Blakey say how Aunt Martha's lumbago is doing these days? The Knott Labs Laser 360 SCIENCE has found the, "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". Case Closed!

[Steve Barber]

        You claim the SBT to be Fact, and then submit HEAR SAY to corroborate it? Really? How's Aunt Martha's lumbago doing these days? The Knott Labs Laser 360 SCIENCE has found the, "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". Case Closed!

  LOL!! You are such a character, Storing!  This is why so few people in here support what you say.  Since when is what the Chief Counsel of a government investigation said considered  "Hearsay"?  Oh! Because you say it is. Of course!   Blakey confirmed it when he asked the Governor to take his shirt off so he could see the scar.   Just because you say it's "Hearsay" doesn't mean it's hearsay, Storing. 

[Royell Storing]

  LOL!! You are such a character, Storing!  This is why so few people in here support what you say.  Since when is what the Chief Counsel of a government investigation said considered  "Hearsay"?  Oh! Because you say it is. Of course!   Blakey confirmed it when he asked the Governor to take his shirt off so he could see the scar.   Just because you say it's "Hearsay" doesn't mean it's hearsay, Storing.

      What you are proffering is HEARSAY. It does Not matter whether it was Blakey recalling this "story" or Joe The Bartender down at Hanks Pizza. And just for the record, my "support" has always been The Truth.

[Steve Barber]

      What you are proffering is HEARSAY. It does Not matter whether it was Blakey recalling this "story" or Joe The Bartender down at Hanks Pizza. And just for the record, my "support" has always been The Truth.

 Utter  B.S. ,  Storing.Your support is not the truth.  You wouldn't know the truth if it came up and smacked you a good one in the face.

[Della Cross]

For a long time, I didn't believe there was a shot from the front. Several things have now made me think it's at least possible. First, the well-known statement by Parkland MD Malcolm Perry, at a press conference an hour or two after the assassination, that the throat wound was an entrance wound. Perry said he had treated hundreds of patients with similar wounds and he knew the difference between an exit and entrance wound. The SS confiscated all film and transcripts of that press conference. [i(https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/the-ordeal-of-malcolm-perry)[/i]  Second, Perry, while still in Parkland, was threatened by an SS agent and warned to retract his statement about the entrance wound. Why would they have done such a thing? The above web page states, correctly, that "Malcolm Perry was a victim of a large-scale crime." Third, NPIC analyst Dino Brugioni, who saw the original Z film on the evening of Nov. 23, 1963, which had been brought to Washington by two SS agents, who themselves had not yet seen the film, said the film showed a piece of JFK's skull flying into the air.  Those frames are not in the version we see today. Doug Horne is correct that if any aspect of the Z film has been altered, the entire film is suspect.  Fourth, the bullet found by retired SS agent Paul Landis on top of the rear seat of the JFK limo, might be the one that hit JFK's throat from the front. 

[Charles Collins]

The still image (from the video) in the first post of this thread with the camera basically looking over Holland’s shoulder while on the triple underpass shows an aspect that I had not realized until now. That is the close alignment of Holland’s position with the area where smoke was reportedly seen and the sixth floor sniper’s nest window in the TSBD. Like all the photos of the Secret Service Agents, etc, during the shooting, Holland was apparently looking at ground level for a gunman. Gunshot sounds coming from the sniper’s nest window would tend to draw someone’s attention at Holland’s location towards the source of the sounds. And as he (and many others) was apparently only focusing on ground level, the area where smoke was reported is aligned very closely with the sniper’s nest window. So, it isn’t like his attention was drawn in a drastically different direction from where the shots apparently originated.

[Royell Storing]

The still image (from the video) in the first post of this thread with the camera basically looking over Holland’s shoulder while on the triple underpass shows an aspect that I had not realized until now. That is the close alignment of Holland’s position with the area where smoke was reportedly seen and the sixth floor sniper’s nest window in the TSBD. Like all the photos of the Secret Service Agents, etc, during the shooting, Holland was apparently looking at ground level for a gunman. Gunshot sounds coming from the sniper’s nest window would tend to draw someone’s attention at Holland’s location towards the source of the sounds. And as he (and many others) was apparently only focusing on ground level, the area where smoke was reported is aligned very closely with the sniper’s nest window. So, it isn’t like his attention was drawn in a drastically different direction from where the shots apparently originated.

      Based on your, "Gunshot sounds coming from the sniper's nest window would tend to draw someone's attention at Holland's location towards the source of the sounds", would therefore mean that Holland would have HEARD ALL 3 SHOTS FIRED FROM THE SNIPER'S NEST WINDOW. Holland has Never made this claim. Are you Now claiming there were fewer than 3 shots fired from the sniper's nest , or is your contention when scrutinized morphing into a slice of swiss chesse.

[Charles Collins]

      Based on your, "Gunshot sounds coming from the sniper's nest window would tend to draw someone's attention at Holland's location towards the source of the sounds", would therefore mean that Holland would have HEARD ALL 3 SHOTS FIRED FROM THE SNIPER'S NEST WINDOW. Holland has Never made this claim. Are you Now claiming there were fewer than 3 shots fired from the sniper's nest , or is your contention when scrutinized morphing into a slice of swiss chesse.

I am simply pointing out that the direction of the area of the reported smoke (from Holland’s point of view at the time of the shots) is very similar to the direction of the sniper’s window. It is not “way off to the left somewhere” from Holland’s point of view as I had previously assumed/imagined.