What Andrew says someone is "OK with ignoring witnesses", that's a mischaracterization. But I guess it's standard for his courtroom demeanor. I "ignore" (or rather, refuse to accept) many of his interpretations of those witnesses. So, Charles, yes, it's Andrew's opinions that are being contested.
If it was just an opinion based on my interpretations of the witnesses, how did the FBI develop it without me?
Re: the latest in his long line of weirdo accusations: " Jerry "the FBI were bats_it crazy for the first 5 months" Organ".
Well, you called the shot sequence that I was saying followed from the evidence, to wit: JFK being hit in the neck around z195, JBC being hit in the back around z270, and JFK being hit in the head at z313 - "bats__t crazy" several times (this was before the current software started adding a whole lot of scrambled letters e.g. "batspombleprofglidnoctobuns"). How does this sequence differ from the FBI's original shot sequence, accepting SA Howlett's initial review and survey immediately after the assassination finding that "where the President was struck the first time in the neck was approximately 170 feet [from the window ledge of the farthest window to the east in the sixth floor of the TSBD], and that "President Kennedy was struck with the first and third shots fired by the assassin, while Governor Connally was struck with the second shot"? (FBI Gemberling Report of 30 Nov 1963 - Commission Document #5, p 117-118)? [The only difference is that I place the second shot around z271 based on the compiled statements of witnesses as to the shot pattern and the evidence of Greer, Hickey, Powers, Gayle Newman etc., whereas at that point the FBI could not place the location of JBC at the time of the second shot.]
Andrew is like a MAGA supporter; he wants to go back to a simpler time, before 3D modeling, the Lattimer/Haags tests, the Posner/Bugliosi books, clearer copies of the film on home computers, etc. to went the FBI put forth some theory that "coincides" with his fantasy scenario.
Experts are fine until they conflict with the evidence. That doesn't seem to be a problem for you. It is for me.
There's Andrew pleading with Canning to help him get the Justice Department to fund his "compelling" cockamamie Pet Theory for free. Andrew's like Trump, who doesn't spent a dime of his own money on his own Presidential campaign. Now that Don Knotts Lab has the DP laser scan, they could probably test his theory for a few thousand dollars. But Mason won't spend the money.
I never asked, or discussed with, Mr. Canning about funding anything. He offered the statement on his own: "I conclude that the side of Connaly's head is likely to be about
seven to eight inches to the left of his shoulder so that "moving" him to his right to the maximum "allowed" by Betzner's picture still does not put
his torso out of position to have received the bullet on its way from K's throat to C's thigh. I somehow don't envision a further reenactment getting
funded to satisfy
our curiosity."
Interesting you should mention hiring Knott to do a 3D recreation of the first shot around z193. I have asked Knott Labs about doing a 3D recreation of the trajectory from the SN through JFK's neck at points between the lamp post and Thornton sign. They quoted me hourly rates but were not able to give me an estimate of the time. We are still talking. I'll keep you posted...