Ok. My measurement was incorrect. The angle that I get for your trajectory line, correctly measured, is 7.5 degrees to the car direction:
That's for the trajectory you placed on my limo plat.
You still have a bit of a problem putting JFK in the same position at z222 that he was in Altgens #5, however. He is not leaning against the side of the car in z222-225:
How does that show how close the President's rib cage was to the car interior? The Croft Photo shows Kennedy right up against the car interior.
You have his forehead almost above the inside edge of the back seat compartment.
I guess you're referring to the "inside edge of the back seat compartment" in the HSCA Limo Plat, which I consider to be erroneously drawn.
That may have been his position in Altgens #5 but it does not appear to be his position at z222.
The difference appears to be where we place the rifle. If your placement is correct, the angle is 8.3 degrees:
Sorry, I much prefer the line-of-travel in the HSCA Map. Your map's curvature of Elm Street is quite different. You might want to move the limo a little closer to the road stripe. Isn't .3° just a nitpick?
My rejection of the SBT is based on all the evidence but primarily the evidence of the 1...........2......3 shot pattern,
About the worst "evidence" you could have. People's opinions based on a reconstruct in their mind, sometimes months afterwards. Kind of self-serving, because having a short span before the head shot means they were powerless to act or shout out.
the evidence that JFK reacted to the first shot and the evidence that JBC was struck in the back by the second shot, not the first shot. The trajectory issues, condition of CE399, the concussion effect of the second shot and fragment striking Tague on the second shot, the hair flip on the second shot, Nellie's evidence, the absence of evidence of a missed shot etc. provide further support for the 3 shot, 3 hit shot sequence.
Your Z193 trajectory and Don Knotts Lab Z225 trajectory don't work, not on the level of the SBT.