Do we know anymore at 60 years?

[Royell Storing]

Based on the overwhelming evidence, I am not interested in wasting further time researching a man I know is lying. Obviously you are too embarrassed to post any more Gordon Arnold evidence but if you want to present his evidence here, I may decide to take a look and spot more flaws in this well known charlatan's "memories".

And besides, I have clear visual evidence from the man himself of where he was standing while filming and the size of the cannon that nobody else saw.





Nuff said!

JohnM

     The holier than holy Sixth Floor Museum holds a 45 minute Q/A with Gordon Arnold and you are not interested in listening to it? Your "overwhelming evidence" claim is a cover for your now being absolutely floored. The Knott Labs 360 Laser SCIENCE PROVING the "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE" has Disproved your decades long LN belief. You were duped, as were millions of other people. Time to stand up and move forward. The TRUTH has set you free.       

[John Mytton]

     The holier than holy Sixth Floor Museum holds a 45 minute Q/A with Gordon Arnold and you are not interested in listening to it? Your "overwhelming evidence" claim is a cover for your now being absolutely floored. The Knott Labs 360 Laser SCIENCE PROVING the "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE" has Disproved your decades long LN belief. You were duped, as were millions of other people. Time to stand up and move forward. The TRUTH has set you free.       

The holier than holy Sixth Floor Museum holds a 45 minute Q/A with Gordon Arnold and you are not interested in listening to it?

How many times have I got to tell you, I couldn't care less about Gordon Arnold. And you say the interview lasts FORTY FIVE minutes? WOW! So Gordon Arnold got his fifteen minutes of fame times three!

Your "overwhelming evidence" claim is a cover for your now being absolutely floored.

When you have more than 1 deluded eyewitness, get back to me. K?

The Knott Labs 360 Laser SCIENCE PROVING the "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE" has Disproved your decades long LN belief.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a long-lasting disorder in which a person experiences uncontrollable and recurring thoughts (obsessions), engages in repetitive behaviors (compulsions), or both.

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

    JOHN -  SCIENCE is TRUTH. There's no running away from that.  LN's are now on the Wrong Side of Science.  "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE"

[Zeon Mason]

Vast majority (2/3rds ) witness heard the sequence of 3 shots as 1…..2..3 .

If the latest experiment has the SBT trajectory implausible, then there would have to have been either another shooter or the single shooter had a semi auto rifle.

Either way though, the shot sequence would be different would it not ? Since now there had to be a shot hitting JC causing his abrupt shoulder turn very close to JFKs reactions. Therefore shots 1 and 2 would be only probably 1 sec apart.

That would be then a sequence 1..2…..3 which is the reverse of what majority witnesses seemed to have heard.

The only solution , if the the SBT is not viable, to preserve the majority witness perception, would require 2 shooters, one of whom had a silenced rifle that fired the shot at JC about 0.5 sec after JFK is hit at Z-222-223 giving the impression both JFK and JC are simultaneously responding to the same bullet.

But then you still need a 4th shot that’s from a loud rifle shot to have 3 loud shots heard and so when would that 4th shot occur so as to preserve the 1…..2..3 sequence?

Imo it would have to either be between the silenced shot at JC and the Z313 hit on JFK

Or.. it would have to be a 4th shot about 1-1.5 secs AFTER Z313.

[John Mytton]

    JOHN -  SCIENCE is TRUTH. There's no running away from that.  LN's are now on the Wrong Side of Science.  "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE"

I just replied to Steve M. Galbraith and I think you will find value in what was said!

I also find Royell's latest stance on "SCIENCE" absolutely astonishing, because the amount of science that is integral to this case comes from the LNer side which incidentally is beyond compare but Royell has so far ignored the Medical Experts, Forensic Specialists, Photographic Experts, Ballistics Experts, Handwriting Experts and etc etc all in favour of the scraps of pseudo science he collects from the gutter!

JohnM

[Zeon Mason]

It’s basically a question if these laser scientists got the angle of JCs shoulder line matching with what the Z film frames seem to indicate.

How different is their orientation of JC  from Myers computer model?

Should we consider their computer graphics  method more accurate that Myers graphics method of construction by using the Z film?

[Royell Storing]

I just replied to Steve M. Galbraith and I think you will find value in what was said!

I also find Royell's latest stance on "SCIENCE" absolutely astonishing, because the amount of science that is integral to this case comes from the LNer side which incidentally is beyond compare but Royell has so far ignored the Medical Experts, Forensic Specialists, Photographic Experts, Ballistics Experts, Handwriting Experts and etc etc all in favour of the scraps of pseudo science he collects from the gutter!

JohnM

                This is about SCIENCE. Trashing me will Not change what SCIENCE has Declared: "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". LN's are now on the wrong side of SCIENCE. And it's only gonna get worse as the Knott Labs Laser 360 SCIENCE now locates the shooter(s). Just as they do inside court rooms across this country day-in, day-out.

[John Mytton]

                This is about SCIENCE. Trashing me will Not change what SCIENCE has Declared: "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". LN's are now on the wrong side of SCIENCE. And it's only gonna get worse as the Knott Labs Laser 360 SCIENCE now locates the shooter(s). Just as they do inside court rooms across this country day-in, day-out.

Interesting, you have previously stated that this "SCIENCE" involved the close examination of the still frames and photographs taken on 11/22/63

in junction with computer evaluated still frames and photographs taken on 11/22/63. 

But you have stated that the very essence of what the Knott Labs needed to accomplish their task "The Zapruder Film" is Bogus.

Even though you inadvertently have supplied further Proof of the Current Z Film being Bogus,

Take a look at ill positioned Hulked out Connally and this is what YOU call "SCIENCE"! -giggle-


As I have previously stated the strongest case that the Knott Lab's recreation is "garbage in garbage out" comes from YOU!!!

Btw In an alternate universe where this gets to Court, the best way to refute the Knott's Lab's findings comes from their most vocal incompetent supporter? Talk about stumbling and bumbling and kicking an own goal, you take the cake! Hahahahahaha!



JohnM