"How many times have I got to tell you, I couldn't care less about Gordon Arnold. And you say the interview lasts FORTY FIVE minutes? WOW! So Gordon Arnold got his fifteen minutes of fame times three!" john mytton
It appears that you take an approach to this case where by you pick and choose the witnesses you like , while you choose to ignore those that you do not . I could not call that the work of a dedicated , open minded and honest researcher . From your own words about you seem to make it clear that you have never seen the interview , i myself have sat and watched a lot of BS in regard this case , but none the less i watched it , weighed up the evidence regarding what they may have claimed and considered its validity or lack there of . If you are unwilling to do that , and to be honest many LN are not (but not all ) well then your opinions here could hardly be labelled fair , open minded and unbiased . But then two things have already confirmed to me what your mentality is in regard this case , one that i have read many of your posts and i can see your stance form them . But also the mere fact that you chose as an avatar a picture of Bugliosi speaks a lot to me . This is a discussion and debate forum , people have views on this case in which they differ , in that sense both sides should always be willing to be open minded , honest and unbiased in their approach , that is if we all truly value the truth in this matter .
It appears that you take an approach to this case where by you pick and choose the witnesses you like , while you choose to ignore those that you do not . I could not call that the work of a dedicated , open minded and honest researcher .
You do realize that I was the one was the one that posted and analysed a Gordon Arnold interview and he not only told me all I need to know, he physically demonstrated it. Royell tells me that he gave a few more made up details in the 45 minute interview like the guys accent, nationality and duration of event, how are any of those lies supposed to add anything to Arnold's well established lack of credibility?
From your own words about you seem to make it clear that you have never seen the interview ,
I really can't remember, I've seen a lot of stuff over the years.
i myself have sat and watched a lot of BS in regard this case , but none the less i watched it , weighed up the evidence regarding what they may have claimed and considered its validity or lack there of .
What a joke, the amount of credible evidence that points to only Oswald is overwhelming but you being close minded, shuts anything out that upsets your delicate one world view.
If you are unwilling to do that , and to be honest many LN are not (but not all ) well then your opinions here could hardly be labelled fair , open minded and unbiased .
As I said it was me that posted and fairly evaluated the Gordon Arnold video, how many pounds of flesh do you want, that would make you happy?
But then two things have already confirmed to me what your mentality is in regard this case , one that i have read many of your posts and i can see your stance form them .
To give my opinion, by definition I have to fairly evaluate both sides and from your above statement the entire Forum can see, that it is you Fergus who is the close minded one.
But also the mere fact that you chose as an avatar a picture of Bugliosi speaks a lot to me .
Bugliosi just called it as he saw it, you do realize that he also wrote a book attacking the President of the United States "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" Here was a man unlike yourself who stood up for what was right.
Bugliosi who had the hands on experience of well over a hundred cases, nearly all of which he successfully won, spent decades studying this case and in "Reclaiming History" evaluated the most enduring angles for conspiracy for example FBI, CIA, etc and outlined why each and every one was absurd.
This is a discussion and debate forum , people have views on this case in which they differ , in that sense both sides should always be willing to be open minded , honest and unbiased in their approach , that is if we all truly value the truth in this matter .
And tell me Fergus, how open minded are you? because so far from my perspective it doesn't matter how much truth I present, you end up accepting absolutely none of it. The hypocrisy and empty rhetoric that spews forth from every pore of your existence is beyond belief.
JohnM
