The critics think American readers of gun magazines were Carcano experts who wanted an old M91 that was shortened from 50" to 35" and weighed 5 1/2 lbs, if they saw it in an ad.
Exactly Jerry, the price of the Carcano in the Kleins ad in the April 1963 issue of American Rifleman was close to half the price of the next cheapest rifle and the description was most likely written by some half assed advertising agency, and as you say there was a plethora of problems with that ad, which if Kleins were aware of these problems they never bothered to change the info for the close to a year of Kleins ads that I have seen.
So clearly the amount of negative reaction due to the misinformation in the Carcano ad was negligible.
This faux outrage by the CT community is absurd and at the end of the day, the longer Carcano was the better Carcano, so where is the problem? Like I said the slight difference in size had little effect on the finished product, a rifle isn't like a pair of trousers or a pair of shoes where an exact size is required.
JohnM