As you know firsthand this is the classic conspiracy mindset you are trying to reason with. "What about this huh?" and "What about that?". They make incessant demands on evidence that are never required even in a court. Meanwhile every hair-brained cockamamie conspiracy claim dreamed of is uncritically accepted. Gordon Arnold anyone?
As you know firsthand this is the classic conspiracy mindset you are trying to reason with. "What about this huh?" and "What about that?". They make incessant demands on evidence that are never required even in a court. Meanwhile every hair-brained cockamamie conspiracy claim dreamed of is uncritically accepted.
Hi Steve, you're right, specifically here regarding Oswald ordering, receiving and possessing the rifle there is a literal Mountain of evidence yet Martin and his cronies keep trying to create doubt from isolated pieces of evidence while ignoring the Mountain of connected rock solid evidence.
Gordon Arnold anyone?
Royell really has a bug up his ass about Gordon Arnold and Royell thinks that Arnold's BS holds the key to this entire investigation?
I also find Royell's latest stance on "SCIENCE" absolutely astonishing, because the amount of
science that is integral to this case comes from the LNer side which incidentally is beyond compare but Royell has so far ignored the Medical Experts, Forensic Specialists, Photographic Experts, Ballistics Experts, Handwriting Experts and etc etc all in favour of the scraps of pseudo science he collects from the gutter!
JohnM