The LHO Escape -- Panic and Shock

[John Mytton]

Anybody who calls others "paranoid, brainless conspiracy theorists" is showing a total lack of superiority.

Really superior people don't attack others in such a way. They know better.

C'mon Martin, the way you attacked me with every venomous word and then you asked a self serving offensive question designed for a reaction, was "tongue in cheek" reciprocated with the same "respect" that your question deserved.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

C'mon Martin, the way you attacked me with every venomous word and then you asked a self serving offensive question designed for a reaction, was "tongue in cheek" reciprocated with the same "respect" that your question deserved.

JohnM

So, it's the coward's "it was tongue in cheek" way out after overplaying your hand?

Never mind, I know a narcissist, when I see one.

[Mitch Todd]

Whatever flaws you think it has, Wikipedia is still universally regarded as a more reliable source than Martin Weidman.

Who said so? Was there research on this topic, or are you simply making it up?

I can't think of anyone who thinks that Martin Weidman is a more reliable source than Wikipedia. Other than Martin Weidman. Much of the research has been done one this topic, and a great deal already exists on this particular forum!

Kidding aside, researchers looked into the issue issue decades ago, and their findings circulated around the community Samizadat style. No one hears about it now, because they found that there was no discrepancy.

You are operating under the delusion that the difference would matter, or that the fulfillment staff would even notice.

Of course it matters. Only a fool would say that if you order a 36" rifle and they sent you a 40" rifle. you recieved what you've ordered.

We have an order code that in the February issue refers to a 36" long rifle and in the April issue refers to a 40" version of the same model rifle. At some point between the February issue and the April issue c20-t250 went from being 36" to 40".  Even if we ignore any post-dating of the issues, that leaves March open as the month in which this change occurred. In short, there's no actual evidence of a discrepancy in the first place..

Bla bla bla.... The Hidell order was for a 36" rifle, as advertised in the February issue. The order should have been filled with a 36" rifle or cancelled it they had run out of stock.

And if the post-dating is taken into account, Oswald got exactly what he actually ordered, if not exactly quite what he might have expected

Just how idiotic can you be? If Oswald ordered anything at all, he ordered a 36" rifle. If he then receives a 40" than he didn't get exactly what he ordered, !

The length of the rifle doesn't appear at all on the order form, so your continued attempt to tie some measurement to it is ridiculous. Oswald put in the "C20-T750" order code, which was used for both the 36" and 40" rifle at different times. And he got a C20-T750 in return. It's as simple as that. Anything more is just wishful thinking on your part.

And now you want to try and change the subject to something else.

Utter BS... you just don't want to go there

There  is no "there" to get to. Just the usual parade of your retroactively inventing some organization's policy requirement in order to claim a "discrepancy" that only exists as a figment of your own desires.   

[John Mytton]

So, it's the coward's "it was tongue in cheek" way out after overplaying your hand?

Never mind, I know a narcissist, when I see one.

In virtually every one of your responses going back to the year dot, you constantly use aggressive inflammatory language designed for maximum emotional impact, you really can't help yourself, can you!

It's no wonder you forced Bill Brown to be less active and made Richard Smith put you on ignore.

I truly feel sorry for you, but since this Forum appears to be your sole social outlet, feel free to use me as another one of your punching bags because I can take it and keeping you off the streets is not only right, it is a necessary public service!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

In virtually every one of your responses going back to the year dot, you constantly use aggressive inflammatory language designed for maximum emotional impact, you really can't help yourself, can you!

It's no wonder you forced Bill Brown to be less active and made Richard Smith put you on ignore.

I truly feel sorry for you, but since this Forum appears to be your sole social outlet, feel free to use me as another one of your punching bags because I can take it and keeping you off the streets is not only right, it is a necessary public service!

JohnM

Ooh poor cry baby suffering from so many delusions.... Don't try to justify yourself so much. It only shows your weakness and insecurities.

I don't need a nobody with a superiority complex and hiding behind an alias as a "punching bag". It would be easy but also a complete waste time.

but since this Forum appears to be your sole social outlet

Well, it's not the only one, but one of a few, because, unlike you, I actually have a life off line.

Now, can we get back to the discussion in the thread, or do you want to continue to derail?

[Jack Nessan]

I can't think of anyone who thinks that Martin Weidman is a more reliable source than Wikipedia. Other than Martin Weidman. Much of the research has been done one this topic, and a great deal already exists on this particular forum!

Kidding aside, researchers looked into the issue issue decades ago, and their findings circulated around the community Samizadat style. No one hears about it now, because they found that there was no discrepancy.

The length of the rifle doesn't appear at all on the order form, so your continued attempt to tie some measurement to it is ridiculous. Oswald put in the "C20-T750" order code, which was used for both the 36" and 40" rifle at different times. And he got a C20-T750 in return. It's as simple as that. Anything more is just wishful thinking on your part.

There  is no "there" to get to. Just the usual parade of your retroactively inventing some organization's policy requirement in order to claim a "discrepancy" that only exists as a figment of your own desires.

Oswald could never have received the rifle as advertised from the February ad. The rifle pictured in the February Ad is a 40 inch carcano not a 36 inch carcano. A 36 inch carcano has a shorter barrel length sticking out front of the hand guard and a different rear sight. There are no carcano’s that weigh 5 and ½ pounds. Kleins just fixed the ad for April and sold the rifle they had pictured.

A Quick and Dirty Guide: Carcano Rifle Models – Surplused

[John Mytton]

Now, can we get back to the discussion in the thread, or do you want to continue to derail?

Huh? You, not me was the one who butted in and started attacking me in the post designated "reply 130", but since you are getting your ass kicked you are now running away, run little Marty run! Hahahaha!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Huh? You, not me was the one who butted in and started attacking me in the post designated "reply 130", but since you are getting your ass kicked you are now running away, run little Marty run! Hahahaha!

JohnM

but since you are getting your ass kicked

And there it is again.... Johnny is so insecure that he constantly needs to remind himself just how "superior" he thinks he is. Sad, very sad

Btw prior to post 130 we were discussing your idiotic claim that, if somebody orders a 36" rifle and receives a 40" rifle, he somehow has received what he ordered.