Michael: I am not ignoring anything you wrote. My preference is to discuss one item at a time.
For instance, here is my post on the library card:
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/did-lee-harvey-oswald-have-david-ferrie-s-library-card
Your article is a prime example of your draconian approach to pro-conspiracy witnesses, even ones who did not realize that their accounts were problematic for the lone-gunman theory.
You admit that Ms. Eames said that Ferrie came to her house asking about "whose library card Oswald had." You also concede that Ms. Garner said that Ferrie came to her house as well. Now, let's stop right there. Let's stop and think about this. Why, why, oh why, would Ferrie have taken the time to go to Ms. Eames' house and ask her about "whose library card Oswald had"?! And why did he visit another person who knew Oswald, Ms. Garner, apparently for the same reason? Why? If Ferrie did not know Oswald, what on earth was going on here?
You reject the Eames and Garner accounts as irrelevant, coincidental, and innocent, if not mistaken. You jump on the fact that the women were not certain about the dates or because one of them gave a date when Ferrie could not have been there. Then, you opine, via Roy, that Ferrie may have visited the women to ask about his library card/what library card Oswald had for an innocent reason, namely, that Ferrie merely thought it was possible that somehow Oswald had ended up with one of his old library cards from his CAP days.
Now how would Oswald have "just happened" to have ended up with Ferrie's library card from his and Ferrie's CAP days? Describe for me a scenario in which this could have plausibly occurred, especially given your claim Ferrie did not know Oswald. Was Ferrie in the habit of brandishing his library card and leaving it behind during CAP meetings? I mean, how could this have happened?
I remember when I had a library card. The only time I would ever take it out of my wallet was when I went to the library--otherwise, I had no reason to take it out of my wallet.
Let's go back to Raymond Broshears. Actually, he was not well liked in the gay community. He rubbed everybody the wrong way.
I am not sure if you know about Stephen Roy (aka Blackburst) but he is the authority on David Ferrie. He was writing a book about David Ferrie, but unfortunately he died before it could be published. However, I am
fortunate to have a copy.
He spoke to Broshears about David Ferrie. He came away believing he was a fabulist. He did not know must about Ferrie and he did not know much about his apartment, although he was supposed to be a roommate.
https://www.jfk-online.com/dbraybropost.html
If you read my posts, you can see many of the ridiculous stuff that Broshears told Garrison:
- Broshears had sex with Kerry Thornley and recognized his hips in the oswald backyard photographs. [MG: Given Thornley's character and record, why is this "ridiculous"?]
- Hale Boggs was part of the conspiracy, and Clay Shaw was responsible for keeping Boggs in office. [MG: Did Broshears claim to have actual knowledge of this, or was he speculating? Given Clay Shaw's wealth and standing, is it so wild that Broshears may have believed Shaw kept Boggs in office?]
- Two men from Garrison's office threatened Ferrie in 1965. [MG: Okay, and you know this is absolutely false how? This claim is mild compared to some of the bogus claims that Garrison's critics made about him.]
- Ferrie was working for a group of people who wanted to take over the United States. [MG: Uh, what is "ridiculous" about this? Ferrie had extensive Mafia ties and publicly called for JFK's execution. Ferrie was also involved with Guy Banister and CIA-backed anti-Castro operations. Jack Ruby, of all people, toward the end of his life, indicated that those who had used him were part of an effort to take over the government.]
- Ferrie told Broshears that Lyndon Johnson killed JFK. [MG: Lots of people had already reached the same conclusion, including the KGB. And, again, was Broshears claiming he "knew" this from inside information, or was he expressing his opinion?]
- Broshears repeated the story about the two assassins being killed in a place crash in Corpus Christi - they were supposed to have been flown by Ferrie from Houston to South Africa.[MG: Okay, and why is this automatically "ridiculous"? Ferrie was an accomplished pilot who sometimes made plane trips in the service of criminal or covert operations. Other than your aversion to multiple assassins, why is this account automatically far-fetched? Just because Broshears repeated the story because he believed it was true does not disqualify him as a witness.]
- Broshears said that Ferrie said that Oswald was one of the best lays he ever had. [MG: Okay, and why is this "ridiculous"? There is considerable evidence that indicates that Oswald was bisexual. Plus, Broshears' comment may have just been playful hyperbole.]
- Broshears said he threatened the life of Lyndon Johnson, and he was then detained in a VA psychiatric hospital in New Orleans. [MG: Yes, so does the fact that he did this and that he therefore drew the attention of law enforcement mean that every statement he made about Ferrie and Oswald is false?]
- Perry Russo stole $2,300 from Clay Shaw. [MG: Okay, why is this automatically "ridiculous"?]
- Broshears was threatened by Secret Service agents after appearing on the Bohrman TV show. [MG: Okay, and why is this automatically "ridiculous"? We know the Secret Service made implied threats against, and placed enormous pressure on, Dr. Perry to get him to change his diagnosis of the throat wound. His good friend Audrey Bell confirmed this to the ARRB.]
- Three people who worked in the TSBD were part of the cell that Oswald had infiltrated. Tippit was sent to kill Oswald because Oswald had infiltrated the cell for the FBI. Oswald had gone to Russia on work for the FBI. [MG: Humm, well, Tippit most certainly appears to have been looking for Oswald--he was far out of his assigned area and had no plausible reason to be there. Oswald was clearly a false defector, and although his sponsor probably was not the FBI, it was another intel entity. And, there were some straing goings-on at the TSBD in the months leading up to the assassination. Plus, again, did Broshears claim that he knew these things from firsthand inside knowledge, or was he theorizing?]
- Ferrie met Jack Ruby in New Orleans. [MG: Entirely plausible and credible.]
- One of the tramps as possibly a gay hustler, or the tramp might have been the man who chauffeured Clay Shaw. [MG: Again, was Broshears saying he knew this from firsthand inside knowledge, or was he passing on hearsay, or was he speculating?]
- Edgar Eugene Bradley was one of he tramps. [MG: Certainly, he got this wrong, since Brading was arrested in the Dal-Tex Building for acting suspiciously right after the assassination. One incorrect claim does not mean we can automatically dismiss everything Broshears said about Ferrie and Oswald, etc.]
- Broshears said he met thornley in a gay bar. [MG: And? Thornley admitted that he spent time in the New Orleans French Quarter, so why is this automatically "ridiculous"?]
And then Broshears was interviewed by the HSCA, and he told more lies: [MG: Were they all "lies"? Really?]
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/reverend-raymond-broshears-talks-to-the-hsca
He told the HSCA that Andrew Sciambra who worked for Garrison had David Ferrie killed. [MG: Well, gee, this is not too far removed from some of the wild claims that Shaw's defense team and their allies in the media made about Garrison and his staff. Here, too, did Broshears claim that he knew this for a fact from firsthand inside information, or was he speculating or passing on rumors he'd heard?]
And this the man you want to believe?? fred
And so you conclude that Broshears never knew David Ferrie, period, and that every single statement he made about Ferrie was a fabrication? I just don't buy that. A few points:
One, as my bracketed comments argue, a number of the claims that you list as ridiculous and false are actually plausible and not so ridiculous. Exactly how would Broshears have known that Ferrie was gay, that Oswald was bisexual, that Thornley knew Oswald, that Thornley spent time in the New Orleans French Quarter, that Jack Ruby made several trips to New Orleans, and that Jack Ruby may well have been bisexual?
Two, just because Broshears exaggerated and fabricated, or wrongly speculated, on some points regarding Ferrie and Oswald, etc., does not mean that everything he said on the subject is false. You don't apply that all-or-nothing standard to non-conspiracy witnesses.
For instance, you don't apply that all-or-nothing standard to the sleazebag and scum Jack Ruby, who clearly lied about a number of things, not to mention his disreputable character and immoral conduct--yet you take Ruby's word on his associations, on his non-involvement in the assassination, on his stalking of Oswald, on his appearance at Parkland Hospital soon after the shooting, on how he entered the police basement, and on why he shot Oswald.
Three, Broshears certainly was highly regarded by at least some members of the gay rights movement at the time, and gay rights writers today who have commented on Broshears have spoken favorably of him. There an be no denying that Broshears did a lot of noble work for the poor and the persecuted. If we compare Broshears with Ruby, Broshears was not nearly as bad a character as Ruby and was more believable than Ruby.
Four, the following disclosures and facts should be considered when judging Broshears' statements:
-- The claim that Perry Russo did not mention the Shaw-Ferrie-Oswald meeting during his first interview with Garrison aide Andrew Sciambra is refuted by Lou Ivon's search warrant. Ivon's search warrant mentioned the meeting that Russo recounted to Sciambra, and it mentioned Shaw's use of the alias "Clay Bertrand." Crucially, the search warrant was written
before Sciambra wrote his two memos on his interviews with Russo.
-- A CIA document reveals that Kerry Thornley was a CIA operative.
-- Douglas Jones was the owner of the Jones Printing Company that printed Oswald's pro-Castro leaflets in New Orleans. Jones identified multiple photos of Kerry Thornley as the man who picked up the leaflets. Jones said Thornley used the name "Lee Osborne," one of the fake names attributed to Oswald.
-- CIA documents reveal that Clay Shaw and David Ferrie were long-time CIA operatives. One CIA document reveals that Shaw worked for the CIA from 1949 through 1972, and that Shaw's CIA contact in New Orleans was Hunter Leake, who was second in command at the CIA's New Orleans field office.
-- Walter Sheridan, a Justice Department official who was helping Clay Shaw's defense team, was recorded threatening Perry Russo and then telling Russo he would get Russo a fake job in California and would give him a monthly check for five years if he would deny that he had seen Oswald with Shaw and Ferrie discussing an assassination plot.
-- When Garrison charged Sheridan with bribery and witness intimidation, Sheridan fled the state. Sheridan did not dare stand trial because his threats and bribery attempt against Russo were captured on an audio recording (Garrison had wisely wired Russo for Russo's meeting with Sheridan).
-- Several CIA documents reveal that Jack Martin worked for the CIA.
Finally, I should add that I am not a huge fan of Jim Garrison. I believe the record is clear that he was on the right track, but I acknowledge that he sometimes knowingly made false claims, that he sometimes purposely exaggerated, and that on a few occasions he used unethical methods.