The above by Royell Storing is a prime example of utter B.S. by a king CT. Storing flatters himself again, then goes off on a tangient talking about playing a game with people who believe Oswald is guilty vs. his lunacy conspiracy theories, which never end. It's constant babble by Storing. A film or photograph is posted in this forum, and immediately, Storing and his ilk are searching for things that have no bearing on the assassination, except in their minds, where they creaate theory after theory, just dying to keep the conspiracy nonsense alive. As I said, Royell Storing, nothing you have ever posted within in this forum have impressed me as a fact. It's nothing but conjecture on your part. You take otherwise innocent people and turn them into conspirators involved in the assassination. And finally, if you think Knotts Lab have proven anything with their extremely sloppy renactment of the positions of JFK and JBC, well, that's par for the course where you are concerned.
I don't need Knotts Lab to tell me anything regarding the single bullet. I already know that JFK and JBC were struck by the same bullet. The Zapruder film and common sense is all it takes to know. Knotts Lab have just made a name for themselves according to all you conspiracy dreamers. If they'd have solved the controversy of CE 399, it would be all over the news, but it isn't because they didn't. People need not look any further than the Zapruder film. The proof is right there, captured on film. Just like JFK was stuck in the back of the head, blowing the top off his head off, and the majority of the fragments from his skull being found some 25 feet ahead of where he was struck with the bullet that hit him in the head, and one large fragment that can clearly be seen inside the limousine flying foward from his head landing on the top of the backrest of the seat occupied by Nellie Connally, and falling towards the floor, where it was found by Secret Service agent Samuel Kinney, and turned into the investigators.
Royell like a 12 year old class clown, just wants to be the centre of attention, I wouldn't take his empty words too seriously because not one of his theories has ever panned out.
The way he says "more to come" or some other such nonsense is just further proof of not wanting to divert attention away from himself, from what he believes is the limelight!
Whereas Lner's just lay all their evidence out for examination and go from there, but for some reason a lot of CT's just want to dribble out their theories while they think we will breathlessly wait for some sort of conclusion, it's a very strange tactic!
What I find funny is that Royell is on record as claiming the Zapruder Film is "bogus", but when I pointed out that Knott Labs relied on the Zapruder Film in it's findings, he quickly changes the subject and a few posts later, out come the Knotts Lab misrepresentations again, it's an endless cycle.
Another example of his niggling is when I pointed out the antenna over the right door on the Lead car and he kept denying it and because he thought he had an advantage, he kept repeatedly implying that all of my other work was not to be trusted but when I found proof that he couldn't deny, he went silent! He never even acknowledged that I was right and an apology would have been nice, but no, just more silence.
JohnM