The Shifting Single-Bullet Theory--It Always "Works" No Matter What

[Andrew Mason]

I'll let the man himself explain.

Charge: Myers misplaces Connally’s jumpseat in order to ensure the alignment of the single bullet theory.

Truth: The location of the jumpseat has no bearing on the alignment of any trajectory plotted in my computer reconstruction. The figures of JFK and JBC were matched to the Zapruder film perspective, not to the location of the jumpseat. Frankly, you could eliminate the entire limousine from the reconstruction and the alignments of JFK and JBC would still be valid since their position in space is based on Zapruder's view of the scene and the relationship of JFK to JBC, and their combined relationship to the TSBD and the surrounding buildings. In short, the position and size of the jumpseat has no bearing on the single bullet theory.
https://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/search?q=speers

It doesn't matter if you have the correct position of JBC in the car AND if you have an accurate model of the limousine.  Myers has neither.  This is Myers' overhead view of his model limousine.:



Jerry Organ's limo model is generally accurate and you can easily see that Myers' limo:
1. has the wrong length to width ratio.  It is much too long for the width. 
2. This results in him having the side window too far forward.  You can see this when you the position of JBC in the two models and see how much farther forward Myers has the side window:



In order to place JBC in the jump seat so that he appears in the same position relative to the side window as seen from Zapruder's position, he has to be moved inboard a significant distance in order for the sightline through the side window to fit what is seen in the zfilm.

Myers' model also does not fit with the positions of the right side window and jump seats as shown in the Hess & Eisenhardt drawing (6 HSCA 50):

And lastly, the paying client by definition must be satisfied, for instance how many defence lawyers have defended an obviously guilty man, the OJ case instantly springs to mind.

JohnM

A defence lawyer does not give evidence.  They are duty bound to defend a client and give the client the benefit of all defences that the evidence and the law permits.  They cannot mislead the court and lead evidence that they know to be false.  In any event, the purpose of a criminal trial is to determine whether the prosecution has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.  It is not to determine what likely happened.

[Jim Hawthorn]

I was only joshing. I thort it would be obvious that i was joshing.

Ah, gotcha.

[Michael T. Griffith]

Charge: Myers misplaces Connally’s jumpseat in order to ensure the alignment of the single bullet theory.

Truth: The location of the jumpseat has no bearing on the alignment of any trajectory plotted in my computer reconstruction. The figures of JFK and JBC were matched to the Zapruder film perspective, not to the location of the jumpseat. Frankly, you could eliminate the entire limousine from the reconstruction and the alignments of JFK and JBC would still be valid since their position in space is based on Zapruder's view of the scene and the relationship of JFK to JBC, and their combined relationship to the TSBD and the surrounding buildings. In short, the position and size of the jumpseat has no bearing on the single bullet theory.
https://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/search?q=speers

No previous SBT reconstruction compares to the recent and historic Knott Lab reconstruction because the Knott reconstruction used a "digital twin" of Dealey Plaza that was based on over 851 million data points collected during 36 laser scans done in Dealey Plaza. The Knott Lab reconstruction proves once and for all that the SBT is simply impossible.

Folks, the SBT is dead, dead, dead. It died when the Zapruder film was released in 1975 and we saw that JFK was clearly, obviously, undeniably hit long before Z224. Another nail was pounded in the SBT's coffin when Harold Weisberg finally obtained clear photos of JFK's tie and shirt. And the Knott Lab 3D-laser SBT reconstruction puts several more nails in the SBT's coffin and wraps a steel band around the coffin. It's dead.

Free your minds and join the 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world who have long since rejected the lone-gunman theory. 

[Royell Storing]

No previous SBT reconstruction compares to the recent and historic Knott Lab reconstruction because the Knott reconstruction used a "digital twin" of Dealey Plaza that was based on over 851 million data points collected during 36 laser scans done in Dealey Plaza. The Knott Lab reconstruction proves once and for all that the SBT is simply impossible.

Folks, the SBT is dead, dead, dead. It died when the Zapruder film was released in 1975 and we saw that JFK was clearly, obviously, undeniably hit long before Z224. Another nail was pounded in the SBT's coffin when Harold Weisberg finally obtained clear photos of JFK's tie and shirt. And the Knott Lab 3D-laser SBT reconstruction puts several more nails in the SBT's coffin and wraps a steel band around the coffin. It's dead.

Free your minds and join the 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world who have long since rejected the lone-gunman theory.

Agree 100% regarding Knott Lab Laser 360 Science having proven the "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". We now have Old Guard JFK "Researchers" morphing into Science Deniers. They and their SBT Theory look silly.

[Jack Nessan]

No previous SBT reconstruction compares to the recent and historic Knott Lab reconstruction because the Knott reconstruction used a "digital twin" of Dealey Plaza that was based on over 851 million data points collected during 36 laser scans done in Dealey Plaza. The Knott Lab reconstruction proves once and for all that the SBT is simply impossible.

Folks, the SBT is dead, dead, dead. It died when the Zapruder film was released in 1975 and we saw that JFK was clearly, obviously, undeniably hit long before Z224. Another nail was pounded in the SBT's coffin when Harold Weisberg finally obtained clear photos of JFK's tie and shirt. And the Knott Lab 3D-laser SBT reconstruction puts several more nails in the SBT's coffin and wraps a steel band around the coffin. It's dead.

Free your minds and join the 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world who have long since rejected the lone-gunman theory.

Knotts did not accomplish a thing. When you view the explanation that surrounds the video it is clear their explanation leaves a lot of room for error and questions. 

The position of LHO in the window is important, but even then, their animation and explanation as to where JBC was in the car still has the level of JBC’s wound lining up with JFK’s wounds from the 6th floor window and JBC is still struck in the back no matter where they positioned him.

Where does the trajectory for JBC’s wounds lead? Where is their explanation for the trajectory and the fact there is only evidence of two bullets. They had the red line going somewhere so why not explain it?

All they have done is create a cartoon, by their own admission, that proves that the shot came from the 6th floor window. If this is the sum total of their capabilities to understand bullet trajectories and the things that influence trajectories, I am surprised they are consulted for forensic work.

[Andrew Mason]

No previous SBT reconstruction compares to the recent and historic Knott Lab reconstruction because the Knott reconstruction used a "digital twin" of Dealey Plaza that was based on over 851 million data points collected during 36 laser scans done in Dealey Plaza. The Knott Lab reconstruction proves once and for all that the SBT is simply impossible.

Folks, the SBT is dead, dead, dead. It died when the Zapruder film was released in 1975 and we saw that JFK was clearly, obviously, undeniably hit long before Z224. Another nail was pounded in the SBT's coffin when Harold Weisberg finally obtained clear photos of JFK's tie and shirt. And the Knott Lab 3D-laser SBT reconstruction puts several more nails in the SBT's coffin and wraps a steel band around the coffin. It's dead.

Free your minds and join the 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world who have long since rejected the lone-gunman theory.

Why do you conclude that the SBT demise leads to the conclusion that Oswald didn't act alone?

[Andrew Mason]

Where does the trajectory for JBC’s wounds lead? Where is their explanation for the trajectory and the fact there is only evidence of two bullets. They had the red line going somewhere so why not explain it?

It goes to JBC's left side.  Where was he hit on the left side?  Do the wound characteristics fit that of CE399 hitting the thigh backwards giving the impression to Dr. Gregory that the thigh wound "was produced by something like the butt end of an intact missile" (4 H 128)?  Does the single dent on the base of the femur fit a bullet striking the femur on a tangent as Dr. Shires observed and depositing a bit of lead in the femur as the x-rays showed?

[Royell Storing]

Knotts did not accomplish a thing. When you view the explanation that surrounds the video it is clear their explanation leaves a lot of room for error and questions. 

The position of LHO in the window is important, but even then, their animation and explanation as to where JBC was in the car still has the level of JBC’s wound lining up with JFK’s wounds from the 6th floor window and JBC is still struck in the back no matter where they positioned him.

Where does the trajectory for JBC’s wounds lead? Where is their explanation for the trajectory and the fact there is only evidence of two bullets. They had the red line going somewhere so why not explain it?

All they have done is create a cartoon, by their own admission, that proves that the shot came from the 6th floor window. If this is the sum total of their capabilities to understand bullet trajectories and the things that influence trajectories, I am surprised they are consulted for forensic work.

    Knott Labs Laser 360 SCIENCE is used to determine the Trajectory of a Bullet(s). That is the sum goal of this SCIENCE. It is not Sherlock Holmes, Perry Mason, or Ben Matlock.