The Shifting Single-Bullet Theory--It Always "Works" No Matter What

[Jack Nessan]

Knott Laboratory does have experience in the field of forensic animation.

Knott Laboratory Reconstruction of Police Shooting Case Settled:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/knott-laboratory-reconstruction-police-shooting-case-ziernicki

This is comparable to the issues of the JFK Assassination? There was a total of two people involved at a distance of roughly 10 feet. More than likely mistaken identity at night.

[Andrew Mason]

Hopefully realize how wrong you are and clue in.

I am not sure what you mean by "clue in".  Do you want me to follow your view and ignore all the evidence not only of the number of shots (3) but also the pattern to conclude that there were only two shots? It seems to me that I am not the one who needs to "clue in".

[Andrew Mason]

HUH. Your reply is Egg timer and DNA? Good thinking. 

Interesting that this is your complete understanding of the video and the obvious problems with the video.

If one corrects for the "obvious problems" with the trajectory by moving the path through JFK even 2 inches to the right, one still has to have JBC sitting on the drive shaft so that his right armpit aligns with the bullet leaving JFK's throat.  It is obvious to me that having JBC sitting on the drive shaft and not in the middle of his seat as he actually was would create a much bigger "obvious problem".  There may be errors. But even generous correction in favour of the SBT still shows that the SBT trajectory does not strike JBC in the right armpit. This tells us two things: 1. the SBT is wrong and 2. the shot through JFK did not occur at z210 or z225.  Rather, it must have occurred when a the straight line path through JFK's neck wound missed JBC's back entirely.

[Royell Storing]

If one corrects for the "obvious problems" with the trajectory by moving the path through JFK even 2 inches to the right, one still has to have JBC sitting on the drive shaft so that his right armpit aligns with the bullet leaving JFK's throat.  It is obvious to me that having JBC sitting on the drive shaft and not in the middle of his seat as he actually was would create a much bigger "obvious problem".  There may be errors. But even generous correction in favour of the SBT still shows that the SBT trajectory does not strike JBC in the right armpit. This tells us two things: 1. the SBT is wrong and 2. the shot through JFK did not occur at z210 or z225.  Rather, it must have occurred when a the straight line path through JFK's neck wound missed JBC's back entirely.

    Just keep your shorts on and wait for Knott Labs to trace the actual bullet trajectories. Knott Labs has thus far only used SCIENCE to DQ the SBT. Much like Maury Povich declaring, "You are NOT the father". Or law enforcement ruling someone OUT as being a suspect. Give SCIENCE the time needed to provide the bullet trajectories.

[Andrew Mason]

    Just keep your shorts on and wait for Knott Labs to trace the actual bullet trajectories. Knott Labs has thus far only used SCIENCE to DQ the SBT. Much like Maury Povich declaring, "You are NOT the father". Or law enforcement ruling someone OUT as being a suspect. Give SCIENCE the time needed to provide the bullet trajectories.

The bullet trajectories are determined by evidence. Science will not tell us when the shots occurred. Science can only assist in interpreting the evidence. 

[Jim Hawthorn]

So it all seems to come down to the assumptions made by Myers and the Knott crew, about what were the actual body positions at the time of the back-to-neck shot (and if the bullet deviated in its path as it passed through JFK).

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Witness evidence & reaction evidence tells us that Oswald's shot-1 happened well before Z133.
I thort that Knotts (reckoned that they) showed that shot-2 after passing throo jfk would have hit Connally near his spine unless Connally was moved further left by about 10 inches.
Re the SBT having or needing a straight line, i think that it is undeniable that a dogleg or double dogleg in the SB trajectory must help the SBT.
And i am thinking that that dogleg might have been as much as say 10 deg in 10 inches, & then say 12  deg in 12 inches, making a possible total of say 22 deg in 22 inches.
We would need to use 2 blocks of jelly to do such a test, or dozens of tests, to see the possible ranges of resulting doglegs.
For example a 10 inch block of jelly separated by say 30 inches of air from a 12 inch block of jelly would probably give a greater range of resulting doglegs than a single 22 inch block of jelly.
I suppose that both blocks of jelly should have some bone in there somewhere.

Bump. I see that this thread is once again being taken over by silly members who are fixated on the 7 inshoots/outshoots (& the Carcano) all being exactly on a silly long dead straight line.
No.
We can have (might have)(must have) (1) a dogleg inside jfk, & (2) a dogleg inside Connally, & (3) a dogleg in his wrist.
That makes 3 doglegs.
And, a 10 inch block of jelly separated by say 30 inches of air from a 12 inch block of jelly would probly give a greater range of resulting doglegs (when analyzing a plurality of tests) than a single 22 inch block of jelly.