JFK What the doctors saw.....Parkland hospital

[Steve M. Galbraith]

These are the actual observations of some of the doctors at Parkland Memorial Hospital on 22 November 1963, as interviewed by Gerald Posner in 1992 for his book Case Closed. It will clear up any misguided conceptions of the preposterously outlandish claim of a large wound in the rear of the President's head.

Gerald Posner's interview with Dr Bill Midgett, 16 April 1992:


Gerald Posner's interview with Dr Charles James Carrico, 8 March 1992:


Gerald Posner's interview with Dr Adolph Hartung Giesecke, 5 March 1992:


Gerald Posner's interview with Dr Paul Conrad Peters, 10 March 1992:


Gerald Posner's interview with Marion Thomas Jenkins, 3 March 1992:


Gerald Posner's interview with Dr Malcolm Perry, 2 April 1992:


Gerald Posner's interview with Dr Charles Rufus Baxter, 12 March 1992:

Let's also remember that the Connallys and Kellerman said they were splatteredd/hit with blood/brain/matter after the 313/head shot. And that the limo was found to have blood/matter on the inside of the windshield, the front seats and the hood.

How could a blowout of the back/rear of JFK's head as the limo went forward and into a headwind lead to this blood/brain/flesh/matter landing in *front* of where he was seated? The exit wound is, for me, where we see it in the film. The top/side of the head. The eyewitnesses who said rear were mistaken. It happens. And the claims that it was blacked out are, frankly, made up by conspiracy believers whose only answer to evidence they don't like is to claim it's part of their conspiracy. Endless conspiracies for decades involving multiple generations of people many of whom weren't alive at the time of the assassination. When does it stop?

Added: The examination of the limo also found blood/brain/matter on the trunk of the limo, behind where JFK was sitting. And a motorcycle officer (Hargis) said he was hit with blood/matter as he rode behind the limo. But in both cases it seems obvious that the limo/Hargis drove *through* the matter as it came down. How this matter landed in front of where JFK was sitting *if* a bullet blew out the *back* of his head seems one that the "rear exit proponents" don't wish to answer.

[Jim Hawthorn]

    To say, "ALL those are too blurry" is Not true.  You brought up the NIX FILM and NOW are retreating to the Z Film. The reason is obvious.

Both films reveal that his head snapped forward then reflexed backwards. I don't really see what there is to discuss about that (unless you feel that both films have been tampered with).

[Royell Storing]

Both films reveal that his head snapped forward then reflexed backwards. I don't really see what there is to discuss about that (unless you feel that both films have been tampered with).

  Tampering issue(s) aside, it comes down to how far Forward YOU believe JFK's head traveled.  I do Not see this massive "Snapped Forward" movement you do. I see JFK's head tipping Down due to Jackie PULLING DOWNWARD on his Arm. Like the SBT, this "head snapped forward" stuff is nothing more than another "theory" that is required to support the, "1 Shooter from behind", hokum.   

[Jim Hawthorn]

  Tampering issue(s) aside, it comes down to how far Forward YOU believe JFK's head traveled.  I do Not see this massive "Snapped Forward" movement you do. I see JFK's head tipping Down due to Jackie PULLING DOWNWARD on his Arm. Like the SBT, this "head snapped forward" stuff is nothing more than another "theory" that is required to support the, "1 Shooter from behind", hokum.

Nobody mentioned a "massive" forward snap. Again, Jackie would've had to smack his head hard to create a sudden forward snap like that. No, it's perfectly clear that his head snaps forward in the space of two frames of the Zapruder footage (and Jackie's arms don't move in those two frames). That said, I'm still open for theories of a second gunman. It's just evident that a bullet hit him from behind at that instant.

[Jim Hawthorn]

Yes, isn't it weird how so many people saw things differently. There is no way to confirm one or the other (beyond exhuming the body).

[Jim Hawthorn]

Hypothetically speaking, even if that did occur, conspiracy advocates will always futilely attempt to assert that shadowy forces have altered all the evidence in a fruitless endeavour to deceive easily misguided souls.

That is debatable (as this forum proves).

[Royell Storing]

  The NIX FILM remains a damming piece of Conspiracy Evidence. NOBODY to this day can explain the White Shirt Man we see moving UP-The-Steps on the NIX Film. None of the other assassination images show any of the 3 Men standing on The Steps to be wearing a White Shirt. This discrepancy begs 2 questions: (1) Where did the White Shirt Man on the NIX Film come from? and (2) Where is the Original NIX Film?

[Steve Barber]

BUMP

 

    JFK is clutching at his throat/chest. Jackie is Pulling DOWNWARD on his arm/wrist to try and reveal whatever his hand is Covering/Not permitting her to see. This sort of thing goes on daily with assorted injuries. We see it on athletic fields around the world on almost a daily basis. This extended "discussion" of the obvious is indicative of the dire straits that LN's now find themselves in after the Knott Labs Laser 360 SCIENCE declared the, "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE". It's ALL suddenly crashing down!

  In this Zapruder frame, where are JFK's hand located?   JFK is "clutching" Nothing!  He never clutched his throat, Storing,