JFK What the doctors saw.....Parkland hospital

[Royell Storing]

Maybe what I'm suggesting was (literally) a cover-up lite. 

    I like your "cover-up lite". I might "borrow" it down-the-road.

[Jim Hawthorn]

Clint Hill contradicts his Warren Commission Testimony.

From the 2004 National Geographic documentary Inside the U.S. Secret Service, @ 39:18 minutes in:

"Above his right ear" is compatible with the autopsy images and X-rays and suggests the parietal bone.

...and yet the Zapruder film shows practically the entire upper cranium as being absent (retouching error?):



...but a few frames earlier, the upper cranium intact:

[Royell Storing]

...and yet the Zapruder film shows practically the entire upper cranium as being absent (retouching error?):



...but a few frames earlier, the upper cranium intact:

   The Zapruder Film was locked up by Time-Life for 12yrs before Geraldo showed Groden's copy on national TV. CIA Image Expert Dino Brugioni went on record as to there being differences between the Current Z Film and the Z Film he examined on 11/23/63. Brugioni is unique in that he had both the bona fides and the opportunity to make this comparison. 

[Jim Hawthorn]

That image is a close-up of JFK and Jackie, cropped from z337. It provides a deceptive appearance as if Mrs Kennedy's pink dress shows where the front half of Mr Kennedy's head is due to a change in the colour tone of the cropped image.

Have a close look at z337. As one can see, the outline and darker area of the front half of the President's head are visible:

Sorry, the image I posted earlier is over-exposed. This montage gives a clearer picture:

In the frame on the left, his head is tilted away from us, yet the upper cranium appears intact.
In the frame on the right, his head is more to profile and less tilted away from us. We should see the upper cranium there but it's gone.
I discussed this years ago here and it was suggested that what we see here is the result of two practically simultaneous shots to the head.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Forensic pathologist Peter Cummings examined the original x-rays and photos (he says the clarity of the originals are far superior). He says the fractures in JFK's skull indicate a single shot from behind, low in the head (and not as the Clark Panel said near the cowlick). One shot, entering from behind, causing fracture lines to radiate from it. I would think a second shot would also cause fracture lines to radiate from it as well as with this one? But there apparently are none, none that Cummings indicates.

[Jim Hawthorn]

One shot, entering from behind, causing fracture lines to radiate from it. I would suggest a second shot would cause fracture lines to radiate from it. But there apparently are none.

The point of the Zapruder head profile images I posted earlier was to demonstrate how the film shows his upper cranium was still intact after the first shot to the head. So the bullet had already entered at the occipital region and exited towards the front, creating that skull flap at the right temple (which we see hanging out). After that, we see in Z315/316/317 that the upper cranium is still intact.



Then Zapruder jerks and suddenly, Kennedy's head is smacked backwards even further...




...and then we see that the upper cranium has gone:



I suggest that it was another shot (from wherever) right after the occipital entry shot, that exploded the upper cranium.

It remains possible however that the shot that entered at the occipital bone did blow he upper cranium out/off and what we see in the Zapruder film (at Z315-317) is in fact a retoucher's error.

[Royell Storing]

Sorry, the image I posted earlier is over-exposed. This montage gives a clearer picture:

In the frame on the left, his head is tilted away from us, yet the upper cranium appears intact.
In the frame on the right, his head is more to profile and less tilted away from us. We should see the upper cranium there but it's gone.
I discussed this years ago here and it was suggested that what we see here is the result of two practically simultaneous shots to the head.

   LN's rely on the Assassination Images until said image(s) become inconvenient to their scripted narrative. Then they come up with Excuses. "Perspective" is their primary parachute and then comes their "on the fly" backup  which almost always flies in the face of what we are actually seeing on an Image(s). What we are seeing above is a 1963 Version of "Terminator 2". The above being the parts where the Bad Terminator slowly morphs into another person/shape. The technology of 1963 limited what they could do with images which rendered that Mess above. Sometimes, LN's just flat-out lie as to what we are seeing. They claim 3 guys are standing on The Steps in Willis 5, (Clearly there is only 2 guys), and now on the Nix Film they are claiming the White Shirt Man moving Up The Steps is instead wearing a Brown Shirt. Fortunately, the Knott Labs 360 Laser SCIENCE and their finding that the "SBT IS IMPOSSIBLE" has literally cut their foundation out from under them. They are now in total free fall.

[Steve Barber]

  Skull fragment found by Sam Kinney, that landed under the seat occupied "By Connally".   The red arrows are pointing to the skull fragment as it was captured in the Z film.  The first image of the skull fragment is Z 314.

   http://   


    Here's the same gif at near regular speed:

   

   Here's a GIF (I believe was made by John Mytton)  clearly showing the top of the skull missing, and the enormous extent of the exit
wound:

    <iframe class="imgur-embed" width="100%" height="756" frameborder="0" src="embed"></iframe>