Wow, the irony is obviously lost on you, but this relentless harassment from you is the very epitome of bombarding me with your off topic "ammunition", at least I use the evidence in the JFK case whereas you are just a nasty little man who scrapes the gutters to try to gain any advantage.
JohnM
I'm just asking a question that you are afraid to answer. You can stop the so-called "relentless harassment" instantly by answering the question.
And as far as using the evidence in the JFK case, I have to admit that you do indeed use it, but only for all sorts of misrepresentations to allegedly "support" superficial conclusions, bogus claims and utter speculation.
a nasty little man who scrapes the gutters to try to gain any advantage.As this goes to your mindset, what advantage am I trying to gain, by asking you a simple question?
Oh, and before I forget, why do you need "even more ammunition"?
You seem to be the only one using that word in relation to something you described as "a figurative Weapon of War"
Well Duh!, Fergus said "to hand you a stick so you can then beat them with it" and Robert posted "John is looking for a stick to beat you with."
And in case you didn't know, a "stick" in this context is a figurative Weapon of War, so I simply responded that, I didn't need any more ammunition(sticks) because Kooks like you and your new best mate, have supplied plenty!
Get it now, Einstein?
JohnM
Btw... Fergus actually said;
lol that looks like you are expecting people to hand you a stick so you can then beat them with it on this forum for years to come . this is a jfk assassination discussion forum .
we wouldn't want you to misrepresent what he actually said, would we now?