Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory  (Read 47067 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2018, 09:09:43 PM »
Advertisement
What you have to do is go by the autopsy report which states "situated on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula there is a 7x4 millimeter oval wound. This wound is measured to be 14 cm from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm below the tip of the right mastoid process."
Also, there are several problems with CTers claiming this bullet did not pass through the president's body and hit Gov. Connally.
 One is: if this bullet did not create the exit wound to the president's throat then where is the exit wound for that shot and where did the bullet go? If it did exit (which there is no exit for) then the only thing in front of the president was Gov. Connally? Why was the Gov. not hit twice? Since there is no exit wound for this shot then the bullet would have remained in the president's body. It was not found.
 Two: If this shot did not pass through the president's body and create the wound to the president's throat and hit Gov. Connally then the wound to the throat was caused by a shot from the front through the windshield (as a lot of CTers claim) then where is the exit wound for that shot? If that bullet did not exit then where did it go? That bullet was not found. So, conspiracy people, you have two disappearing bullets that you have to explain. Talk about magic.   

      (1) There is an Autopsy Photo which clearly displays the wound in JFK's BACK to be well Below the base of his neck. (2) The Autopsy Face Sheet clearly displays JFK's BACK Wound to be well Below the base of his neck (3) Humes placed his finger into JFK's BACK Wound. His finger Stopped at roughly his 1st knuckle. These are FACTS. Your questions above are the direct result of having bought into the nonsensical SBT.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 09:11:44 PM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2018, 09:09:43 PM »


Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2018, 09:23:26 PM »
      (1) There is an Autopsy Photo which clearly displays the wound in JFK's BACK to be well Below the base of his neck. (2) The Autopsy Face Sheet clearly displays JFK's BACK Wound to be well Below the base of his neck (3) Humes placed his finger into JFK's BACK Wound. His finger Stopped at roughly his 1st knuckle. These are FACTS. Your questions above are the direct result of having bought into the nonsensical SBT.

Okay, Royell where did the two bullets go? And it was Humes that wrote the report stating where the hole in the back was. Where did that bullet go? Where is the exit wound for it? How much experience do you have with firearms, in particular, rifles? Rifle bullets go through things Royell. Explain to me what evidence you can cite to explain where the back wound bullet went to and where the throat wound bullet went to? Where are they? So, going by what you claimed as a pertinent fact, you are saying that a rifle bullet only penetrated "one knuckle"? Is that what you are saying? LMAO. A pellet gun would go in farther. You might want to rethink that. Have you ever stuck your finger in a wound to soft flesh? 

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2018, 10:08:08 PM »
Okay, Royell where did the two bullets go? And it was Humes that wrote the report stating where the hole in the back was. Where did that bullet go? Where is the exit wound for it? How much experience do you have with firearms, in particular, rifles? Rifle bullets go through things Royell. Explain to me what evidence you can cite to explain where the back wound bullet went to and where the throat wound bullet went to? Where are they? So, going by what you claimed as a pertinent fact, you are saying that a rifle bullet only penetrated "one knuckle"? Is that what you are saying? LMAO. A pellet gun would go in farther. You might want to rethink that. Have you ever stuck your finger in a wound to soft flesh?

              Humes NEVER bought into the SBT. He knew that was pure Baloney. For 1 thing, he Knew that there were More bullet fragments remaining inside Connally than was missing from the Pristine Bullet
             The bullet that created the shallow JFK BACK Wound was recovered at Parkland Hospital. This is why Specter had to dance a jig during WC Q/A to try and move that bullet onto/off of Connally's stretcher.
             The throat wound/Bullet was removed/recovered from JFK's body at Bethesda. This is 1 of the reasons the body of JFK needed to arrive at Bethesda Early/Before Jackie & the empty casket. There is No disputing the early arrival of JFK's body. The arrival time of approx 18:35 is Documented on Sgt Roger Boyajian's Official MD 236, and corroborated by Humes ARRB Testimony.   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2018, 10:08:08 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2018, 11:32:07 PM »
      (1) There is an Autopsy Photo which clearly displays the wound in JFK's BACK to be well Below the base of his neck.

That is false.

 
Quote
(2) The Autopsy Face Sheet clearly displays JFK's BACK Wound to be well Below the base of his neck


http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sun.gif

Quote
(3) Humes placed his finger into JFK's BACK Wound. His finger Stopped at roughly his 1st knuckle.

That is false.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2018, 11:34:51 PM »
              Humes NEVER bought into the SBT. He knew that was pure Baloney. For 1 thing, he Knew that there were More bullet fragments remaining inside Connally than was missing from the Pristine Bullet

All of that is false.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2018, 11:34:51 PM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2018, 11:49:50 PM »

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #22 on: March 13, 2018, 12:00:39 AM »
Nurse Phyllis Hall , who was 28 at the time and was in trauma room 1 saw a bullet between JFK's ear and his shoulder while cradling his head. She said it was unlike any of the other bullets that were retrieved and was removed and never presented in evidence. Hall says the bullet had a pointed tip and showed no signs of damage and was about 1 and a 1/2 inches long .Would this have been the bullet that made the throat entrance wound but never traversed the body.  Tomlinson and OP Wright said that CE399 resembled the bullet they discovered on the day that JFK died. But the FBI agent who was supposed to have interviewed both men and the bureau's own suppressed records contradicts the FBI's public memo . Agent Odum denied his role, and the FBI's earliest, suppressed files say only that neither Tomlinson nor Wright was able to identify the bullet in question. This suppressed file implies the hospital witnesses saw no resemblance , which is precisely what Wright told one of the authors in 1967. I'm sorry about bouncing from Nurse Hall to Tomlinson and OP Wright but there seems to be a trail of bullets that were not tracked to the Carcano in question . It looks  like JFK was hit with 3 bullets , one in the back that did not traverse the body and one frontal shot in the throat that did not traverse the body and then the frontal head shot that blew out the back of JFK's head. Gen. Walker said that the bullet that was fired at him was not the bullet that he was shown later.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #23 on: March 13, 2018, 12:06:21 AM »
That is false.

 

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sun.gif

That is false.

              Have YOU No Shame? The original JFK Autopsy sheet did NOT have an X on it in the neck region. This is what people of your ilk do. Your future posts will be disregarded as YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBILITY.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #23 on: March 13, 2018, 12:06:21 AM »