Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory  (Read 47259 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #104 on: March 24, 2018, 01:42:29 AM »
Advertisement
Gary , I did not use my wording very well about Jerry Ford and the MBT . I know Arlen Specter came up with the MBT or SBT which ever way you want to put it. I thought that Fords movement of the final location of the back wound to the base of the neck wound made it seem that there was a possible chance for the MBT to have done the damage it did . Hale Boggs , Richard Russell and John Cooper thought the MBT to be improbable. I think my main thought had to be, why did Ford think that the movement of the entry in the back of JFK needed to be moved up to the base of the neck and was Ford the only person that thought the wound needed to be moved?

Specter did not own SBT. He is usually given the credit for it but there were others who realized early on that it was the only thing that fit with the evidence.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #104 on: March 24, 2018, 01:42:29 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #105 on: March 24, 2018, 01:43:53 AM »
Ford moved the back wound , thus creating " The Magic Bullet " CE 399 !

Ford never moved any wound by even as much as a mm in any direction.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #106 on: March 25, 2018, 02:08:48 AM »


         There is clearly a difference between a person's BACK and their NECK.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #106 on: March 25, 2018, 02:08:48 AM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #107 on: March 25, 2018, 02:54:37 PM »
Ford never moved any wound by even as much as a mm in any direction.

Correct. He would have had to have been present at the autopsy so to do. What he did, was change the description of the position of the wound. Easy peasy.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #108 on: March 25, 2018, 03:39:37 PM »
Right, generic face sheets are used in virtually all autopsies so the location of wounds and injuries on the

deceased can be obscured. geez


Tell us Bill are JFK's wounds accurately depicted in the illustrations below?





The head shot looks relatively accurate if Jackie's statement 'top, behind the forehead' was accurate.

I prefer actual photos to drawings. How a wound position is described to an artist is the responsibility of the person describing it; if the result is inaccurate then something went sideways between the two.

Do you understand the difference between sloped v square shoulders
Show us where Kennedy's square* shoulders match the sloped shoulders in the generic face sheet drawing
Show us where the 14 x 14 measurement noted on the face sheet changed position

Again, tell us how a face sheet drawing is meant to replace the actual measurement of the body itself.

*Hint: Google 'JFK shoulders swim'
« Last Edit: March 25, 2018, 04:36:59 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #108 on: March 25, 2018, 03:39:37 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #109 on: March 25, 2018, 03:49:45 PM »
Do you understand the difference between sloped v square shoulders
Show us where Kennedy's square* shoulders match the sloped shoulders in the generic face sheet drawing
Show us where the 14 x 14 measurement noted on the face sheet changed position

Again, tell us how a face sheet drawing is meant to replace the actual measurement of the body itself.

*Hint: Google 'JFK shoulders swim'


           The  Autopsy Photos of JFK 's BACK Wound in No Way resemble the cockamamie illustrations you have provided above.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #110 on: March 25, 2018, 04:10:58 PM »

           The  Autopsy Photos of JFK 's BACK Wound in No Way resemble the cockamamie illustrations you have provided above.

A more apt description of the twofer inshoot would be 'neck/back' wound, given that the missile struck precisely at the junction where the neck merges into the back (according to the autopsy, and described elsewhere as such)

Gary provided the 'cockamamie' illustrations above, not me. I agree they look wonky; pretty sure JFK would be hard-pressed to remain in that bolt-upright position, or even attain it.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2018, 05:29:06 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #111 on: March 25, 2018, 05:19:38 PM »
Correct. He would have had to have been present at the autopsy so to do. What he did, was change the description of the position of the wound. Easy peasy.

Close enough. He recommended changing the description of the position of wound. Rightly so.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #111 on: March 25, 2018, 05:19:38 PM »