Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory  (Read 51784 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #144 on: August 20, 2019, 02:32:08 AM »
Advertisement
Doesn't the jacket have to be bunched and the trajectory slope made sleeper? That's a cartoon for idiots.

Quote
Doesn't the jacket have to be bunched

 Thumb1:



Quote
That's a cartoon for idiots.

Exactly, that's precisely the audience that gobbles up such illogical absurdities.

JohnM
« Last Edit: August 20, 2019, 02:33:09 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #144 on: August 20, 2019, 02:32:08 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #145 on: August 20, 2019, 08:05:07 PM »
Bunch?  What bunch?


Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #146 on: August 21, 2019, 10:42:10 AM »
Sure, John, sure. Sure, Bill, sure.

Here's my all-time favorite photo about this whole sordid deal. Here's your heroes again. Not us wacky and fun-loving conspiracy theorists but, you know, officialdom:



See the two markers on the stand-in? Do you know why they have TWO markers? It's very simple, Bill and John (and Jerry). First, they know what the medical evidence is. So now, after some lawyer tells them, "Well, we know your boss wants no questions about this. The playboy is gone and we can do all manner of fudging (and xxxing around with) the evidence. It's just gotta be one shooter from right up thar."

So they know the medical history. A hole in the throat (hence the sticker on the stand-in's back of the neck) and the lower sticker. Even G-Men know where the back of the neck and the back are located for crissake! And, you know, the EXACT SAME HOLES we see in the autopsy photos. So they put the stickers there to somehow - SOME WAY - try to figure it out during this reenactment.

Only they can't. It's not possible. The bullet's traveling downward, yet the stickers are going UPWARD. Duh, much?

So hence, the final report is honest ("back") until old Gerry pencils in "back of neck."

As John I says above, there was no bunch. But even if there was, it doesn't change anything. All you gotta do is look at the autopsy photo of the back. Even if the jacket had a hole way down the bottom due to bunching (but ALAS it doesn't) the back wound in the photo shows they got it right in the above photo like they got it right with the stickers.

Now if you guys want to let your Kennedy bias kick in again and go all like, "BUT BUT BUT what about this...or that...or this..." - then you go right ahead. And I'm sure you will. But all the bias in the world is not going to change what's obvious in these photos as well as the autopsy.

'Night John Boy. 'Night Mary Ellen.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #146 on: August 21, 2019, 10:42:10 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #147 on: August 21, 2019, 03:43:07 PM »
The Altgens photo of Kennedy on Houston shows the bunch more clearly (ie: there's no shadow on the back from the jacket collar).

What bunch?


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #148 on: August 21, 2019, 11:16:30 PM »
Bunch?  What bunch?



Blob? What Blob? LOL™!

Kennedy's jacket at Love Field as compared to Kennedy's Jacket on Elm street.



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #148 on: August 21, 2019, 11:16:30 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #149 on: August 22, 2019, 12:09:58 AM »
Kennedy's jacket at Love Field as compared to Kennedy's Jacket on Elm street.

You think the magic bullet traversed at Z-160?

Willis 5 was taken on Elm street as well.

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #150 on: August 22, 2019, 01:24:33 AM »
Naturally, and as to be expected, the unbiased here are jumping around all over the place. When I talk about two dots on the Kennedy stand-in and expect someone from the unbiased to explain that point, they talk about the Connally guy being too low in the seat.

No explanation whatsoever of how a bullet heading from roughly 90 yards away and at a downward angle, hits the guy's back - and YES it's the back - and then somehow moves upward and exit the throat where the other marker is.

No explanation at all. And get this - the xxxxing back shot didn't even exit!  Hahahaha! That's a fact. Period.

Sure, sure.  Hahahaha!

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #151 on: August 22, 2019, 01:36:47 AM »
You think the magic bullet traversed at Z-160?

Willis 5 was taken on Elm street as well.

Quote
You think the magic bullet traversed at Z-160?

No, and I don't think that CE399 was fired a couple of seconds later at about Zapruder frame 202 either, so what's your point?

Quote
Willis 5 was taken on Elm street as well.



Yawn, the old Willis 5 defence. But why rely on an overexposed blob when you have a near perfect image in Croft? Unbelievable!

As soon as Kennedy had settled into the Limo at Love Field his Jacket was bunched.



And the jacket was still bunched at Croft.



Fortunately we have film taken when both Croft and Willis took their photos and I see no evidence that in those two seconds that Kennedy was waving he finally decided to remove the bunch from his jacket. This Zapruder extract starts at Croft and finishes at Willis.



JohnM
« Last Edit: August 22, 2019, 07:49:29 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #151 on: August 22, 2019, 01:36:47 AM »