Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory

[Jerry Organ]

What bunch?

What shadow of the jacket collar?



Connally's jacket collar has a shadow.

[John Mytton]

Bunch?  What bunch?

Blob? What Blob? LOL™!

Kennedy's jacket at Love Field as compared to Kennedy's Jacket on Elm street.



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Kennedy's jacket at Love Field as compared to Kennedy's Jacket on Elm street.

You think the magic bullet traversed at Z-160?

Willis 5 was taken on Elm street as well.

[Michael Walton]

Naturally, and as to be expected, the unbiased here are jumping around all over the place. When I talk about two dots on the Kennedy stand-in and expect someone from the unbiased to explain that point, they talk about the Connally guy being too low in the seat.

No explanation whatsoever of how a bullet heading from roughly 90 yards away and at a downward angle, hits the guy's back - and YES it's the back - and then somehow moves upward and exit the throat where the other marker is.

No explanation at all. And get this - the xxxxing back shot didn't even exit!  Hahahaha! That's a fact. Period.

Sure, sure.  Hahahaha!

[John Mytton]

You think the magic bullet traversed at Z-160?

Willis 5 was taken on Elm street as well.

You think the magic bullet traversed at Z-160?

No, and I don't think that CE399 was fired a couple of seconds later at about Zapruder frame 202 either, so what's your point?

Willis 5 was taken on Elm street as well.

Yawn, the old Willis 5 defence. But why rely on an overexposed blob when you have a near perfect image in Croft? Unbelievable!

As soon as Kennedy had settled into the Limo at Love Field his Jacket was bunched.



And the jacket was still bunched at Croft.



Fortunately we have film taken when both Croft and Willis took their photos and I see no evidence that in those two seconds that Kennedy was waving he finally decided to remove the bunch from his jacket. This Zapruder extract starts at Croft and finishes at Willis.



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

No, and I don't think that CE399 was fired a couple of seconds later at about Zapruder frame 202 either, so what's your point?

How do you know if or how the jacket was bunched when JFK was struck in the back?

[Bill Chapman]

How do you know if or how the jacket was bunched when JFK was struck in the back?

AFAIK, no one testified to seeing Kennedy straighten his bunch (or his junk) between Croft 160 and his Zap vanishing act.

Kinda hard to pull off a Jean-Luc Picard with one hand in his lap and the other one waving.

[John Iacoletti]

AFAIK, one testified to seeing Kennedy straighten his bunch (or his junk) between Croft 160 and his Zap vanishing act.

Is it necessary to overtly and visibly straighten one's bunch?