Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory

[Gary Craig]

Gary , your Post on the C-Span interview with FBI Agent James Sibert is very much worth listening to. It reveals that Gerald Ford changed the location of the back wound to the base of the neck in order to coincide with the magic bullet theory which more than likely made Ford and Arlen Specter to be in collusion about that entry placement . Sibert stood there at close range and he said the back bullet entry was in the upper back and not  where Ford places it , which was in the base of the back of the neck . J. Lee Rankins son showed Sibert over 40,000 pages of notes that were taken during the Warren Commission  and they found notes pertaining to Gerald Ford and his placement of the bullet hole . Sibert was at the autopsy and saw 1st hand where the wound was . They used a probe to go into the entry wound in " The Back " and the probe went in about as far as Humes went in with his small finger , which only went to his first knuckle . There was no exit for the back wound until Gerald Ford moves the entrance wound to the base of the neck so Specter can force feed all of us " The Single Bullet Theory " !

 

INTERVIEW WITH FORMER FBI AGENT JAMES SIBERT (JUNE 30, 2005)
James W. Sibert was one of two FBI agents who witnessed President Kennedy's autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital on the night of November 22, 1963

[Michael Walton]

To John M, Bill and the other Kennedy hating biased "researchers" here:

The start of this thread was why old Gerry penciled in "of neck."

I disputed that way up above - before it got buried with all of your ridiculous nonsense - about the G-Men's reenactment showing two stickers on the stand in. The G-Men knew it was the back and front of the throat (hence the stickers).

Instead of running around bringing up bunches, 3D photos of the spinal column that show absolutely nothing of interest, I'm still waiting for you to dispute my dispute.

Remember - if it's not too difficult to do, stick to the task at hand.

Remember - no more bunches. No more other bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns.

How is it that your heroes know where the wounds are based on their stickers, yet old Gerry pencils in "of neck?" How is it that they actually got the wound locations almost precisely where the autopsy photos are, yet Gerry would still pencil it in?

How is it that any of you can't see what the G-Men - your heroes - CAN see?

Dispute please.

Bumping this for John M, Bill and other [biased] Kennedy haters...

Come on, I'm waiting. Please dispute why the FBI reenactment photo shows a throat marker for the frontal wound, a marker for the back wound, why they knew where the wounds were located, and why old Gerry felt compelled to add "of neck" to the report.

[Denis Pointing]

Bumping this for John M, Bill and other [biased] Kennedy haters...

Come on, I'm waiting. Please dispute why the FBI reenactment photo shows a throat marker for the frontal wound, a marker for the back wound, why they knew where the wounds were located, and why old Gerry felt compelled to add "of neck" to the report.

 Does this asshole guy really think members are going to bother to debate with someone who starts every post with " biased Kennedy haters"? I certainly won't be. ~shrug~

[Mike Orr]

Go to you tube and type in --- Uncut interview-- JFK's Emergency Room Doctor : Dr.Robert McClelland .  Starting at about the 9:00 minute mark , Dr. McClelland goes into detail of the wound in the right back of JFK's head wound where he describes a wound of about 5 inches in diameter and he ask the other Drs. if they have seen the back of his head of which they said no and with that Dr. McClelland says that the right side of the back of his head is gone . Dr. McClelland and Dr. Malcolm Perry were best of friends and Dr. Perry to Dr. McCelland that he was approached by a person who cautioned him that he should not say anything .  It was odd that when I typed in the https://you tube.com/watch?v=IQ435IMaCng , it took me to you tube but it said the video was unavailable but when I just went to you tube and typed in --- Uncut interview--JFK's Emergency Room Doctor : Dr. Robert Mclelland  ,  then the video came up . 

[John Mytton]

Does this asshole guy really think members are going to bother to debate with someone who starts every post with " biased Kennedy haters"? I certainly won't be. ~shrug~

 

Hi Denis, after Walton's pissweak allegations were thouroughly refuted with science and irrefutable evidence I suddenly became a "biased Kennedy hater", so that's when I stopped reading his posts and I was only aware of his request for debate because of your post.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Go to you tube and type in --- Uncut interview-- JFK's Emergency Room Doctor : Dr.Robert McClelland .  Starting at about the 9:00 minute mark , Dr. McClelland goes into detail of the wound in the right back of JFK's head wound where he describes a wound of about 5 inches in diameter and he ask the other Drs. if they have seen the back of his head of which they said no and with that Dr. McClelland says that the right side of the back of his head is gone . Dr. McClelland and Dr. Malcolm Perry were best of friends and Dr. Perry to Dr. McCelland that he was approached by a person who cautioned him that he should not say anything .  It was odd that when I typed in the https://you tube.com/watch?v=IQ435IMaCng , it took me to you tube but it said the video was unavailable but when I just went to you tube and typed in --- Uncut interview--JFK's Emergency Room Doctor : Dr. Robert Mclelland  ,  then the video came up .

Hi Mike, McClelland in his WC testimony talks about looking down into Kennedy head wound, McClelland recalls "and this sprung open the bones that I mentioned in such a way that you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself"?
To accurately analyse this event we have to look at the total evidence because it only happened one way, now even though there may be what appears to be some contrary testimony, at the end of the day we have to look at the strongest evidence and what we have is the Zapruder film which shows an explosion over the right ear and matter moving forward, the Nix film which shows matter moving forward, the Autopsy photos show the same wound as does the Xrays.
Btw why would anyone place a shooter in front of Kennedy when your Lone Nut Patsy was behind that just doesn't make sense, if it was me I would place a dozen shooters behind with absolutely nobody anywhere else but that's just me!



JohnM

[Mike Orr]

Why would Dr. McClelland ask the other Drs. if they had seen the right back of the head where Dr. McClelland says the right back side of the head is missing which he said was about a 5 inch circumference hole " about the size of a large orange if the autopsy photos show the right side of JFK's head with several hinged skull bones going different directions above and forward of the right ear . If the Parkland Drs. did not see this type of wound on the right side of the head , that tells me that wound on the right side of the head did not exist in Dallas.

[John Mytton]

Why would Dr. McClelland ask the other Drs. if they had seen the right back of the head where Dr. McClelland says the right back side of the head is missing which he said was about a 5 inch circumference hole " about the size of a large orange if the autopsy photos show the right side of JFK's head with several hinged skull bones going different directions above and forward of the right ear . If the Parkland Drs. did not see this type of wound on the right side of the head , that tells me that wound on the right side of the head did not exist in Dallas.

Mike, you didn't even attempt to explain how on Earth McClelland could look down into the hole on Kennedy's skull, what McClelland descibes in his testimony under oath is what we see in the authenticated autopsy photos.
 

that tells me that wound on the right side of the head did not exist in Dallas.

Zapruder and the Newman's were interviewed on the same afternoon and they describe a wound on the right side of Kennedy's head, so we can at least establish that when Kennedy was in Dealey Plaza he had a wound on the right side of his head.





Btw the Zapruder film has been authenticated at the granular level and in addition the very next week in LIFE magazine of which they only had a few days to prepare, LIFE printed images from around the most important frames which means that there was no sequences of any significance left to tamper with.



JohnM