Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory

[John Mytton]

Hmm.....”because he said so” seemed to be good enough for you when you were asked how Brennan knew that the person  crouched down behind boxes aiming a rifle was the same person he saw earlier on a windowsill.

What has that got to do with the price of fish? Brennan saw the same guy in the same window twice within several minutes, what's so hard to believe about that? Out of the scores of windows in the buildings surrounding Brennan he just happens to pick the one window which has Oswald's prints on the recently moved rifle rest, shells from Oswald's rifle and on the same floor Oswald's rifle is found with Oswald's prints. So it was either Oswald or it was some massive still unproved conspiracy. Btw don't bother a point by point rebutal that only contains unconnected liars because that's just stupid!

Here's what has to be Brennan looking up at Oswald's sniper's nest.



Anyway, getting back on track there is no need to speculate what McClelland could see because we have photos which conclusively show that it was possible for McClelland to look DOWN into Kennedy's head wound.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

So if a photo doesn’t show a bunch then it’s not of “sufficient resolution”. How convenient.

The jacket was bunched because Zapruder filmed the bunched jacket.



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

What has that got to do with the price of fish? Brennan saw the same guy in the same window twice within several minutes, what's so hard to believe about that?

What’s so hard to believe about seeing a hole in the back of somebody’s head?

Out of the scores of windows in the buildings surrounding Brennan he just happens to pick the one window which has Oswald's prints on the recently moved rifle rest

What “recently moved rifle rest”?

, shells from Oswald's rifle

LOL

and on the same floor Oswald's rifle

LOL

is found with Oswald's prints.

No, some prints were found near the trigger guard that we’re useless for identification purposes, and a partial palm print showed up a week later on an index card.

So it was either Oswald

Or it was not Oswald.

Here's what has to be Brennan looking up at Oswald's sniper's nest.

How long after the assassination was that taken?

Anyway, getting back on track there is no need to speculate what McClelland could see because we have photos which conclusively show that it was possible for McClelland to look DOWN into Kennedy's head wound.

Who cares what is possible?

[John Iacoletti]

The jacket was bunched because Zapruder filmed the bunched jacket.

What “bunched jacket”?

[John Mytton]

What’s so hard to believe about seeing a hole in the back of somebody’s head?

What “recently moved rifle rest”?

LOL

LOL

No, some prints were found near the trigger guard that we’re useless for identification purposes, and a partial palm print showed up a week later on an index card.

Or it was not Oswald.

Hilarious, I knew you'd take the stupid route and go with the massive still unproven conspiracy where everyone whose name wasn't Oswald lied, nice.
But seriosly Iacoletti, you haven't made one conclusion in the whole time you've been posting, it's a never ending list of paranoid suspicions which goes nowhere, what a waste of time!

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

What “bunched jacket”?

This bunched jacket. Practically from the moment he sat down in the limo @Love Field


The Wild Bunch


Love Field 11/22/63

[John Iacoletti]

This bunched jacket. Practically from the moment he sat down in the limo @Love Field

Go back to sleep, Bill.  "Mytton" was talking about the Z film.

[John Iacoletti]

Hilarious, I knew you'd take the stupid route and go with the massive still unproven conspiracy where everyone whose name wasn't Oswald lied, nice.

What massive still unproven conspiracy where everyone whose name wasn't Oswald lied?  The one you just made up as a false alternative because you can't actually prove that Oswald did it?  Nice.