Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory  (Read 47120 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #24 on: March 13, 2018, 12:22:11 AM »
Advertisement
              Have YOU No Shame? The original JFK Autopsy sheet did NOT have an X on it in the neck region. This is what people of your ilk do. Your future posts will be disregarded as YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBILITY.

Have you no shame or are you just an imbecile? The person who placed the X on the facesheet is the same person who placed the dot on it. He said that the dot was not accurate but that the notations were. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #24 on: March 13, 2018, 12:22:11 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #25 on: March 13, 2018, 12:24:40 AM »
Are Autopsy Face Sheets Supposed to be Drawn to Scale?

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/toscale.htm

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #26 on: March 13, 2018, 03:20:12 AM »
Nurse Phyllis Hall , who was 28 at the time and was in trauma room 1 saw a bullet between JFK's ear and his shoulder while cradling his head. She said it was unlike any of the other bullets that were retrieved and was removed and never presented in evidence. Hall says the bullet had a pointed tip and showed no signs of damage and was about 1 and a 1/2 inches long .Would this have been the bullet that made the throat entrance wound but never traversed the body.  Tomlinson and OP Wright said that CE399 resembled the bullet they discovered on the day that JFK died. But the FBI agent who was supposed to have interviewed both men and the bureau's own suppressed records contradicts the FBI's public memo . Agent Odum denied his role, and the FBI's earliest, suppressed files say only that neither Tomlinson nor Wright was able to identify the bullet in question. This suppressed file implies the hospital witnesses saw no resemblance , which is precisely what Wright told one of the authors in 1967. I'm sorry about bouncing from Nurse Hall to Tomlinson and OP Wright but there seems to be a trail of bullets that were not tracked to the Carcano in question . It looks  like JFK was hit with 3 bullets , one in the back that did not traverse the body and one frontal shot in the throat that did not traverse the body and then the frontal head shot that blew out the back of JFK's head. Gen. Walker said that the bullet that was fired at him was not the bullet that he was shown later.

Hey Mike, ever heard of x-rays? 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #26 on: March 13, 2018, 03:20:12 AM »


Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #27 on: March 13, 2018, 02:48:45 PM »
              Humes NEVER bought into the SBT. He knew that was pure Baloney. For 1 thing, he Knew that there were More bullet fragments remaining inside Connally than was missing from the Pristine Bullet
             The bullet that created the shallow JFK BACK Wound was recovered at Parkland Hospital. This is why Specter had to dance a jig during WC Q/A to try and move that bullet onto/off of Connally's stretcher.
             The throat wound/Bullet was removed/recovered from JFK's body at Bethesda. This is 1 of the reasons the body of JFK needed to arrive at Bethesda Early/Before Jackie & the empty casket. There is No disputing the early arrival of JFK's body. The arrival time of approx 18:35 is Documented on Sgt Roger Boyajian's Official MD 236, and corroborated by Humes ARRB Testimony.   

Are you Irish? Because that is pure blarney. Most of you CTers don't have much experience with firearms do you? Because if you did have experience with firearms you would be embarrassed to claim the things you do. Name a rifle that only penetrates soft tissue one inch. You realize that you have created two "magic bullets" don't you? Name the rifle that would only penetrate one inch. Go shoot some cans or melons or whatever. Learn something about rifles and we can talk. This is just too stupid to debate.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #28 on: March 13, 2018, 03:38:16 PM »
Have you no shame or are you just an imbecile? The person who placed the X on the facesheet is the same person who placed the dot on it. He said that the dot was not accurate but that the notations were.


               We were talking about the Original Autopsy Face Sheet. YOU Dishonestly Substituted a diagram which was NOT the Original Autopsy Face Sheet. YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #28 on: March 13, 2018, 03:38:16 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #29 on: March 13, 2018, 03:40:31 PM »
That is false.

 

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sun.gif

That is false.


             Bump as to intentional Misrepresentation.  YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #30 on: March 13, 2018, 04:35:20 PM »




Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #31 on: March 14, 2018, 02:30:58 AM »

               We were talking about the Original Autopsy Face Sheet. YOU Dishonestly Substituted a diagram which was NOT the Original Autopsy Face Sheet. YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY

Life must be really hard for you.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory
« Reply #31 on: March 14, 2018, 02:30:58 AM »