Oswald Acted Alone Is The Most Popular Theory

[Charles Collins]

And you can believe whatever you need to, it's none of my business.

Fischer said it could have been a t-shirt. Rowland said he was wearing a t-shirt. And it appears that LHO was wearing a t-shirt. Therefore, your claim that (they said he was wearing clothes LHO didn’t have) doesn’t hold water.

[Dan O'meara]

Again, many people who encountered Oswald face to face described his manner of dress in different ways.  You are relying upon descriptions of how he was dressed as viewed from a 6th floor window to suggest doubt while disregarding one witness who confirmed it was Oswald while also ignoring the mountain of evidence that links him to the crime.

You are relying upon descriptions of how he was dressed as viewed from a 6th floor window to suggest doubt

I'm not suggesting any kind of doubt, I'm simply quoting what all three eye-witnesses said. It's you who wants to introduce doubt.

while disregarding one witness who confirmed it was Oswald

 
I'm disregarding Brennan's "identification" of Oswald?
Which identification would that be?
The first one? The second one?
Out of interest (not that you would know this) but when is Brennan's first official "identification" of Oswald?
What is the first documented evidence of Brennan's "identification"?
And as long as you're relying on Brennan's identification of the man he thought was about ten years older than Oswald, what about his description of the shooter lingering at the SN window until after the limo had reached the underpass? Doesn't that undo your narrative about Oswald teleporting down to the second floor lunchroom in time to buy a Coke before Baker comes bursting in even though Truly, who was ahead of Baker, never saw Oswald or the door closing or waffle, waffle, waffle.

while also ignoring the mountain of evidence that links him to the crime.

I don't ignore a single scrap of evidence that links Oswald to the crime.
How else could he be framed for it?

[Dan O'meara]

Fischer said it could have been a t-shirt. Rowland said he was wearing a t-shirt. And it appears that LHO was wearing a t-shirt. Therefore, your claim that (they said he was wearing clothes LHO didn’t have) doesn’t hold water.

 Rowland said he was wearing a t-shirt

Arnold Rowland's WC testimony:

"He had on a light shirt, a very light-colored shirt, white or a light blue or a color such as that. This was open at the collar. I think it was unbuttoned about halfway, and then he had a regular T-shirt, a polo shirt under this, at least this is what it appeared to be."

The man on the 6th floor was wearing a light coloured shirt that was open at the collar. Underneath this shirt he was wearing a T-shirt.
You are in danger of making a fool of yourself here Charles, you're better than this. Don't go full blown Nutter.
Believe what you need to believe Charles, but let the evidence speak for itself.

[Richard Smith]

You are relying upon descriptions of how he was dressed as viewed from a 6th floor window to suggest doubt

I'm not suggesting any kind of doubt, I'm simply quoting what all three eye-witnesses said. It's you who wants to introduce doubt.

So Oswald did it?  Great.  Close the forum.  There is nothing left to discuss.

[Charles Collins]

Rowland said he was wearing a t-shirt

Arnold Rowland's WC testimony:

"He had on a light shirt, a very light-colored shirt, white or a light blue or a color such as that. This was open at the collar. I think it was unbuttoned about halfway, and then he had a regular T-shirt, a polo shirt under this, at least this is what it appeared to be."

The man on the 6th floor was wearing a light coloured shirt that was open at the collar. Underneath this shirt he was wearing a T-shirt.
You are in danger of making a fool of yourself here Charles, you're better than this. Don't go full blown Nutter.
Believe what you need to believe Charles, but let the evidence speak for itself.

No one is making a fool out of himself. Your assumptions do however show some promise in that regard. I didn’t say anything about what he was wearing over the t-shirt. The fact remains that Rowland said he was wearing a t-shirt. It is entirely feasible that the outer shirt could have been removed by the time he was seen in the SE corner window. He was described as wearing a t-shirt as he went through the second floor offices. It appears to me that he was donning and removing the outer shirt purposefully in order to change his appearance and try to make it harder to track him.

[Dan O'meara]

So Oswald did it?  Great.  Close the forum.  There is nothing left to discuss.

 
You'd love that, wouldn't you.

[Dan O'meara]

No one is making a fool out of himself. Your assumptions do however show some promise in that regard. I didn’t say anything about what he was wearing over the t-shirt. The fact remains that Rowland said he was wearing a t-shirt. It is entirely feasible that the outer shirt could have been removed by the time he was seen in the SE corner window. He was described as wearing a t-shirt as he went through the second floor offices. It appears to me that he was donning and removing the outer shirt purposefully in order to change his appearance and try to make it harder to track him.

I didn’t say anything about what he was wearing over the t-shirt.

I know. That's why I made the remark about allowing the evidence to speak for itself. Like Fischer and Edwards, Rowland describes the man on the sixth floor as wearing a light coloured open necked shirt with a collar. It doesn't matter how you try to twist and turn the evidence, Oswald wasn't wearing such a garment. Oswald was wearing a brown coloured shirt with a collar and a white T-shirt with no collar. That's just the way it is.
Your waffle about Oswald taking off his shirt is really silly.
It's clear you've gone full blown Nutter. I'm just going to let the posts I've made about this issue stand as they are. I'm happy to let the reader judge for themselves.

[Charles Collins]

I didn’t say anything about what he was wearing over the t-shirt.

I know. That's why I made the remark about allowing the evidence to speak for itself. Like Fischer and Edwards, Rowland describes the man on the sixth floor as wearing a light coloured open necked shirt with a collar. It doesn't matter how you try to twist and turn the evidence, Oswald wasn't wearing such a garment. Oswald was wearing a brown coloured shirt with a collar and a white T-shirt with no collar. That's just the way it is.
Your waffle about Oswald taking off his shirt is really silly.
It's clear you've gone full blown Nutter. I'm just going to let the posts I've made about this issue stand as they are. I'm happy to let the reader judge for themselves.

Clearly Fischer includes a t-shirt as an open collar shirt. He specifically and unequivocally says that it could have been a t-shirt. You choose to ignore this fact and continue to delude yourself. And why would you think that taking off the outer shirt is silly?