Tippit Debate

[John Iacoletti]

Yeah John, that fraction of a T-shirt looks exceptionally "ragged"? LOL

"Fraction".  LOL. 1/1 is a "fraction" too.  Typical "Mytton" hyperbole.

But completely beside the point that Bill was trying to misrepresent the T-shirt as not being visible.

[John Iacoletti]

Gee Whiz John, this really takes the cake, two independent time pieces where each were relied upon to be extremely accurate, and both were synchronized within a minute of each other but for some desperate CT reasoning they were both exactly wrong by the exact same amount.

Gee whiz, "Mytton", you forgot to demonstrate with any evidence whatsoever that they "were synchronized within a minute of each other" or that they were "relied upon to be extremely accurate", or that anybody reasoned that "they were both exactly wrong by the exact same amount".

Triple play -- nice!

[John Mytton]

Gee whiz, "Mytton", you forgot to demonstrate with any evidence whatsoever that they "were synchronized within a minute of each other"

Already did!



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Already did!

That's not evidence that they were "independent". Or accurate.  Keep trying.  But I thought you were trying to claim that the two dispatchers' timepieces were synchronized.

[John Mytton]

But I thought you were trying to claim that the two dispatchers' timepieces were synchronized.

After the 12:35 time call on both channels, Capt. Souter calls in advising "Do not use Industrial".



Both radio operators, repeat "Do not use Industrial" both with the 12:36 timestamp.



And again at 12:45 both dispatchers with their own slight variations, broadcast a description that is very very close to Oswald



JohnM

[Mitch Todd]

That's not evidence that they were "independent". Or accurate.  Keep trying.  But I thought you were trying to claim that the two dispatchers' timepieces were synchronized.

Define "synchronized" in the current context.

[John Mytton]

"Fraction".  LOL. 1/1 is a "fraction" too.  Typical "Mytton" hyperbole.

Improper Fraction
A fraction p/q>=1. A fraction with p/q<1 is called a proper fraction. Therefore, the special cases 1/1, 2/2, 3/3, etc. are generally considered to be improper.
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ImproperFraction.html#:~:text=Therefore%2C%20the%20special%20cases%201,generally%20considered%20to%20be%20improper.

JohnM

[Bill Brown]

"Fraction".  LOL. 1/1 is a "fraction" too.  Typical "Mytton" hyperbole.

But completely beside the point that Bill was trying to misrepresent the T-shirt as not being visible.

No.

I didn't say the T-shirt wasn't visible.  Why would you lie like that?

YOU simply forgot that for the Friday lineups, Oswald was wearing the outer brown shirt over the T-shirt when you tried to make the point that Oswald was in the lineups in a ragged T-shirt.

Like John Mytton said... stop digging yourself deeper.  Move on already.