Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Royell Storing]

Dude, I've been studying the JFK assassination for 45 years and I've been lurking at the Ed Forum since 2005, so I've already read all of your xxxxxxx.

You need to accept the fact that the so-called Single Bullet Theory is correct.

     Forensic Science has found that "Theory" to be "Impossible". Knott Lab Forensic Science has found that this "theory" that was founded by a lawyer: (1) in a basement, (2) with a mock auto back seat, and, (3) utilizing a hand held pointer, was "Impossible".   

[Tom Mahon]

Question: Is that kind of bullet known for being especially stable in flight?

Answer: Yes

Question: Is that kind of bullet known for starting to tumble upon exiting something soft, like a block of ballistics gel or a human neck?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Was the entry wound in JFK's back circular in shape?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Was the entry wound in JBC's back elliptical in shape?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Was JBC sitting significantly farther to the left and lower than JFK?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Was JBC turned far to his right when he was hit?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Did JFK's elbows and arms rise immediately when he was hit because his spinal column was nicked by the bullet?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Did JBC react more slowly because his spinal column wasn't nicked by the bullet?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Did JBC's jacket bulge outward a frame or two after JFK raised his elbows, and did his lapel flap outward a frame after that?

Answer: Yes.

Case Closed.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Dude, I've been studying the JFK assassination for 45 years and I've been lurking at the Ed Forum since 2005, so I've already read all of your xxxxxxx.

You need to accept the fact that the so-called Single Bullet Theory is correct.

I started serious study of the (so-called) jfk assassination say 5 years ago.
I found lots of pearls of info on this forum & on the ed forum.
I got my best info from Holland (websites)(re ricochet), & from Donahue & Menninger (Mortal Error book)(Hickey fired headshot), & McLaren (jfk Smoking Gun book)(Hickey fired headshot).
Me myself i found that Hickey fired an auto burst (Donahue & allso McLaren failed to discover the auto burst).
Read all of my postings on both forums.
Re the single bullet theory, i have explained that i believe in the single bullet theory, but that i prefer to call that bullet the magic bullet (even tho there was nothing magical about it at all)(ie all proper analyses & tests have confirmed the single bullet theory)(& any denial of the SBT is a sign of mental disorder or mental illness),

[Tom Mahon]

Max Holland is very good, especially at showing us, in the Robert Hughes film, the movement of something white (Oswald's t-shirt?) in the Sniper's Nest window about five seconds before the first shot rang out, that Oswald had to be standing and awkwardly leaning forward when he fired his steeply-downward-angled / missing-everything first shot (which we now know was at hypothetical "Z-124," i.e., half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133), that the ejection pattern of the three shells found on the Sniper's Nest floor support the scenario that Oswald was standing for his first shot and kneeling for his second and third shots, that overly ambitious, scandal-plagued and revengeful Jim Garrison changed his theory against Clay Shaw from "He organized a homosexual thrill-kill assassination of JFK" to "He organized the assassination for the CIA" due to a KGB article published in a Communist-owned Italian Newspaper three days after he'd arrested Shaw (which newspaper article -- or a clone of it that was published in a far-Left newspaper in France -- was given to him by JFKA conspiracy theorist Joan Mellen's husband), but I think he's mistaken when he postulates that Oswald's first shot glanced off the traffic signal's mast arm and indirectly nicked James Tague down by the triple underpass.

[Charles Collins]

Max Holland is very good, especially at showing us, in the Robert Hughes film, the movement of something white (Oswald's t-shirt?) in the Sniper's Nest window about five seconds before the first shot rang out, that Oswald had to be standing and awkwardly leaning forward when he fired his steeply-downward-angled / missing-everything first shot (which we now know was at hypothetical "Z-124," i.e., half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133), that the ejection pattern of the three shells found on the Sniper's Nest floor support the scenario that Oswald was standing for his first shot and kneeling for his second and third shots, that overly ambitious, scandal-plagued and revengeful Jim Garrison changed his theory against Clay Shaw from "He organized a homosexual thrill-kill assassination of JFK" to "He organized the assassination for the CIA" due to a KGB article published in a Communist-owned Italian Newspaper three days after he'd arrested Shaw (which newspaper article -- or a clone of it that was published in a far-Left newspaper in France -- was given to him by JFKA conspiracy theorist Joan Mellen's husband), but I think he's mistaken when he postulates that Oswald's first shot glanced off the traffic signal's mast arm and indirectly nicked James Tague down by the triple underpass.

Max Holland’s video depiction of the sniper firing the first shot from a standing position is lacking a lot. If he had constructed a complete sniper’s nest with all of the boxes in their proper places (including all of the boxes immediately surrounding the nest), he would have found out that there really isn’t enough room for a sniper to kneel between the boxes.

Where does Max Holland indicate the “movement of something white” in the window? I simply don’t remember where it was indicated to be. If it was in the open (lower 1/4) part of the window, he would have been sitting on the box and leaning forward preparing to aim the rifle.

Sitting on the box while firing all three shots would have been his most stable and feasible position given the ergonomics of the sniper’s nest, and he should have known that from his military training and experience. The window box was in a position that could have interfered with an early first shot. That interference might have caused an inadvertent discharge (before it was fully aimed).

The ejection pattern could also be explained by using more force ejecting the first missed shot due to frustration regarding an inadvertent discharge.

[Tom Mahon]

How do I post a screenshot here?

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

Max Holland is very good, especially at showing us, in the Robert Hughes film, the movement of something white (Oswald's t-shirt?) in the Sniper's Nest window about five seconds before the first shot rang out, that Oswald had to be standing and awkwardly leaning forward when he fired his steeply-downward-angled / missing-everything first shot (which we now know was at hypothetical "Z-124," i.e., half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133), that the ejection pattern of the three shells found on the Sniper's Nest floor support the scenario that Oswald was standing for his first shot and kneeling for his second and third shots, that overly ambitious, scandal-plagued and revengeful Jim Garrison changed his theory against Clay Shaw from "He organized a homosexual thrill-kill assassination of JFK" to "He organized the assassination for the CIA" due to a KGB article published in a Communist-owned Italian Newspaper three days after he'd arrested Shaw (which newspaper article -- or a clone of it that was published in a far-Left newspaper in France -- was given to him by JFKA conspiracy theorist Joan Mellen's husband), but I think he's mistaken when he postulates that Oswald's first shot glanced off the traffic signal's mast arm and indirectly nicked James Tague down by the triple underpass.

Yes Holland's idea that a ricochet offa the signals injured Tague is nonsense.
But Holland did divulge a lot of good info. Which shows us that Oswald's first shot did ricochet offa the signals.

[Tom Mahon]

Where does Max Holland indicate the “movement of something white” in the window? I simply don’t remember where it was indicated to be. If it was in the open (lower 1/4) part of the window, he would have been sitting on the box and leaning forward preparing to aim the rifle.

Have you watched "The Lost Bullet"?