Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Dan O'meara]

Nice gaslighting.

But then again, you've had a lot of practice, haven't you.

You clearly don't know what gaslighting is.
But you do know what deflection is.
Once again, the opportunity to answer this unbelievably straightforward question has passed by:

"Do you agree that establishing Oswald's ownership of the Mannlicher-Carcano doesn't prove he actually took the shots?"


I can't help but wonder what is it about this question Nutters find so problematic.

[Tom Mahon]

Do you agree that establishing Oswald's ownership of the Mannlicher-Carcano doesn't prove he actually took the shots?

When taken in combination with the fact that the Carcano (sans Mannlicher) was found on the same floor as the Sniper's Nest, the fact that three shells fired from that Carcano were found on the Sniper's Nest floor, the fact that Oswald's prints were found on the Carcano and on two of the four strangely positioned Sniper's Nest boxes, the fact that some fibers found on the Carcano were similar to the fibers in his shirt, the fact that CE-399 and the two largest bullet fragments found in the limo had been fired from that Carcano to the exclusion of all other guns in the world, the fact Buell Wesley Frazier saw Oswald carrying a long package towards the rear door of the TSBD that morning, and the fact that Howard Brennan saw Oswald in the Sniper's Nest window during, just before, or just after the shooting -- the fact that Oswald owned that Carcano suggests to The Reasonable Man that, yes, the sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist known as Lee Harvey Oswald "took the shots," and did so with his Carcano.

To think (sic) otherwise is to irrationally believe that a bad guy used Oswald's Carcano to shoot JFK from that location, and that he and oodles and gobs of his bad-guy colleagues had manufactured and then planted oodles and gobs of Oswald-incriminating evidence.

Hmm . . . But wait! How and why did they deform CE-399 so strangely, etc., etc., etc.?

LOL!

I mean I mean I mean (to borrow a phrase from Jim DiEugenio), if I had to bet my life on whether or not Oswald "took the shots," I'd say "Yes!" . . . wouldn't you?

[Richard Smith]

Let's not ignore the point of my post.
Do you agree that establishing Oswald's ownership of the Mannlicher-Carcano doesn't prove he actually took the shots?

Establishing ownership of the murder weapon is highly incriminating absent any explanation or evidence that explains its presence at the crime scene.  After 60 years, there is not a scintilla of evidence that lends itself to the conclusion that any other person obtained Oswald's rifle.  Oswald lied to the police about his ownership of any such rifle.  We know he lied because there are documents and photos showing him with the rifle.  This case would be a slam dunk in any other context.  No doubt whatsoever of Oswald's guilt based on his connection to the rifle and the rifle's connection to the crime.

[Dan O'meara]

When taken in combination with the fact that the Carcano (sans Mannlicher) was found on the same floor as the Sniper's Nest, the fact that three shells fired from that Carcano were found on the Sniper's Nest floor, the fact that Oswald's prints were found on the Carcano and on two of the four strangely positioned Sniper's Nest boxes, the fact that some fibers found on the Carcano were similar to the fibers in his shirt, the fact that CE-399 and the two largest bullet fragments found in the limo had been fired from that Carcano to the exclusion of all other guns in the world, the fact Buell Wesley Frazier saw Oswald carrying a long package towards the rear door of the TSBD that morning, and the fact that Howard Brennan saw Oswald in the Sniper's Nest window during, just before, or just after the shooting -- the fact that Oswald owned that Carcano suggests to The Reasonable Man that, yes, the sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist known as Lee Harvey Oswald "took the shots," and did so with his Carcano.

To think (sic) otherwise is to irrationally believe that a bad guy used Oswald's Carcano to shoot JFK from that location, and that he and oodles and gobs of his bad-guy colleagues had manufactured and then planted oodles and gobs of Oswald-incriminating evidence.

Hmm . . . But wait! How and why did they deform CE-399 so strangely, etc., etc., etc.?

LOL!

I mean I mean I mean (to borrow a phrase from Jim DiEugenio), if I had to bet my life on whether or not Oswald "took the shots," I'd say "Yes!" . . . wouldn't you?

 

It's such a straightforward, simple question yet it is like Kryptonite for the truly rabid zealot.

This is your last chance to answer this question.
No more deflection.
No pretending you've already answered it when you haven't.
It's a Yes/No answer.

 - "Do you agree that establishing Oswald's ownership of the Mannlicher-Carcano doesn't prove he actually took the shots?"

Nutters are so funny 

[Dan O'meara]

Establishing ownership of the murder weapon is highly incriminating absent any explanation or evidence that explains its presence at the crime scene.  After 60 years, there is not a scintilla of evidence that lends itself to the conclusion that any other person obtained Oswald's rifle.  Oswald lied to the police about his ownership of any such rifle.  We know he lied because there are documents and photos showing him with the rifle.  This case would be a slam dunk in any other context.  No doubt whatsoever of Oswald's guilt based on his connection to the rifle and the rifle's connection to the crime.

And here he is.
High Priest of the Zealous.

"Do you agree that establishing Oswald's ownership of the Mannlicher-Carcano doesn't prove he actually took the shots?"

It's so much fun watching you squirm 

[John Iacoletti]

I'm so surprised you can't bring yourself to answer such a straightforward question 
Nutter Test passed with flying colours.

I'm not.  That's how Graves operates.

[John Iacoletti]

When taken in combination with the fact that the Carcano (sans Mannlicher) was found on the same floor as the Sniper's Nest, the fact that three shells fired from that Carcano were found on the Sniper's Nest floor, the fact that Oswald's prints were found on the Carcano and on two of the four strangely positioned Sniper's Nest boxes, the fact that some fibers found on the Carcano were similar to the fibers in his shirt, the fact that CE-399 and the two largest bullet fragments found in the limo had been fired from that Carcano to the exclusion of all other guns in the world, the fact Buell Wesley Frazier saw Oswald carrying a long package towards the rear door of the TSBD that morning, and the fact that Howard Brennan saw Oswald in the Sniper's Nest window during, just before, or just after the shooting -- the fact that Oswald owned that Carcano suggests to The Reasonable Man that, yes, the sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist known as Lee Harvey Oswald "took the shots," and did so with his Carcano.

"his Carcano".  LOL.

Calling something a "fact" doesn't make it one.

[John Iacoletti]

Establishing ownership of the murder weapon is highly incriminating absent any explanation or evidence that explains its presence at the crime scene.

If only you could "establish ownership"...