Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Dan O'meara]

It's interesting that you're trying to gaslight your way out of having previously stated Shelley was "an ex-CIA type."

Do you believe Shelley was a CIA (former or . . . gasp . . . current) agent, or not, O'meara?

If so, upon what do you base your belief?

(Do you find that you encounter a lot of "CIA types" in day-to-day life and on the Internet?)

Sorry to put you "on the spot," Old Chap, but you did ask for it.

Now put up or shut up as we say here in The States.

Do you believe Shelley was a CIA (former or . . . gasp . . . current) agent, or not, O'meara?

I'm sorry you felt gaslighted Tom, even though that never actually happened.
In future, don't refer to me by just my surname, it's rude and shows a lack of character.

I truly don't give a Spotty Avocada one way or the other if Shelley was CIA, it has absolutely no bearing on my theory.
Just to get you up to speed, Bill Shelley is dead so he's hardly "current" CIA. 
You are clearly one of these types fascinated by the KGB/CIA angle rather than what actually happened in Dealey Plaza that day.

I have no way of knowing whether Shelley was actually CIA or not (and neither do you).
This angle came up in connection with the dubious Glaze letters and I thought it added a bit of colour to the description of him, made him seem more like someone more likely to be involved in suspicious activity. You have just homed in on this detail like a heat-seeking missile and everything else I've posted has now become irrelevant as far as you're concerned.
Maybe Shelley was CIA, maybe he wasn't, it makes no difference to me.

I cannot answer your question any more definitively or honestly than that.

(Do you find that you encounter a lot of "CIA types" in day-to-day life and on the Internet?)

Hmmmm....I'm going to assume you just have a weird sense of humour.

Sorry to put you "on the spot," Old Chap, but you did ask for it.

The chance of being put on the spot by someone like yourself is incredibly slim, Tom.
I deal honestly with the evidence and how I interpret it. It puts me at a great advantage.

[Tom Graves]

I truly don't give a Spotty Avocada one way or the other if Shelley was CIA, it has absolutely no bearing on my theory.

Why, then, did you say Shelley was a "former CIA-type" and that it seemed suspicious to you that an ostensible "former CIA-type" like Shelley was hangin' with Oswald and some "pro-Castro types"?

BTW, You really like the word "types," don't you?

Do you find that you have a tendency to stereotype people?

Just to get you up to speed, Bill Shelley is dead so he's hardly "current" CIA.

I guess you're not smart enough to realize that by "current" I meant "then-current," as in then-in-August-of-1963-current.

D'oh!

You are clearly one of these types [THERE YOU GO AGAIN!] fascinated by the KGB/CIA angle rather than what actually happened in Dealey Plaza that day.

It's pretty obvious to me that you've been so brainwashed by 60-plus years of KGB* JFKA disinformation that you'll never be able to grasp that a sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald, with or without KGB* encouragement and/or logistical support, killed JFK on 11/22/63 by firing three shots at him in the echo chamber known as Dealey Plaza.

(Did I mention "over 10.2 seconds"?)

*Today's SVR and FSB

I have no way of knowing whether Shelley was actually CIA or not (and neither do you).

You're the one who brought it up, O'meara.

Remember?

This angle came up in connection with the dubious Glaze letters and I thought it added a bit of colour to the description of him, made him seem more like someone more likely to be involved in suspicious activity.

Okay.

You have just homed in on this detail like a heat-seeking missile and everything else I've posted has now become irrelevant as far as you're concerned.

No, it already was.

Sorry to hurt your feelings, O'meara.

Maybe Shelley was CIA, maybe he wasn't, it makes no difference to me.

How about if he was just a "former CIA-type"?

Would that facilitate your tinfoil-hat JFKA CT?

I cannot answer your question any more definitively or honestly than that.

Apology accepted.

The chance of being put "on the spot" by someone like yourself is incredibly slim, Tom.

I deal honestly with the evidence and how I interpret it. It puts me at a great advantage.

No, O'meara. You just think you do.

That's the really sad part.

See, I've put you on the spot, again, Old Chap.

[Dan O'meara]

Why, then, did you say Shelley was a "former CIA-type" and that it seemed suspicious to you that an ostensible "former CIA-type" like Shelley was hangin' with Oswald and some "pro-Castro types"?

BTW, You really like the word "types," don't you?

Do you find that you have a tendency to stereotype people?

I guess you're not smart enough to realize that by "current" I meant "then-current," as in then-in-August-of-1963-current.

D'oh!

It's pretty obvious to me that you've been so brainwashed by 60-plus years of KGB* JFKA disinformation that you'll never be able to grasp that a sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald, with or without KGB* encouragement and/or logistical support, killed JFK on 11/22/63 by firing three shots at him in the echo chamber known as Dealey Plaza.

(Did I mention "over 10.2 seconds"?)

*Today's SVR and FSB

You're the one who brought it up, O'meara.

Remember?
 

Okay.

No, it already was.

Sorry to hurt your feelings, O'meara.

How about if he was just a "former CIA-type"?

Would that facilitate your tinfoil-hat JFKA CT?

Apology accepted.

No, O'meara. You just think you do.

That's the really sad part.

See, I've put you on the spot, again, Old Chap.

"then-current"

 
Brilliant.

[Dan O'meara]

Anyone actually interested in when the first shot was fired try "The First Shot" thread.
Don't let Tommy the Commie lead you astray. 

[Tom Graves]

"then-current"

 
Brilliant.

I figured that you were so stupid, you might be saying that you thought Shelley was . . . gasp!!! . . . CIA in August of 1963!!!

It sure sounded that way!

LOL!  LOL!  LOL!

 

.