Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Andrew Mason]

How many bad guys do YOU figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important COVER UP?

Oodles and gobs?

You responded to my post in which I said there is less than zero evidence for an early missed shot and for a second shot SBT. Maybe you should have read it before responding.  Here is the last paragraph:

“ I would also say that there is less than zero evidence for the second shot SBT for the same reasons.  However, where we seem to disagree is whether there was more than one shooter.  I suggest that the evidence does not exclude all three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.  In fact, I suggest that the evidence as a whole compels such a conclusion.”

[Tom Mahon]

You responded to my post in which I said there is less than zero evidence for an early missed shot and for a second shot SBT. Maybe you should have read it before responding.  Here is the last paragraph:

“ I would also say that there is less than zero evidence for the second shot SBT for the same reasons.  However, where we seem to disagree is whether there was more than one shooter.  I suggest that the evidence does not exclude all three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.  In fact, I suggest that the evidence as a whole compels such a conclusion.”

1) Do you think Oswald was the only shooter?

2) If so, do you think Oswald fired three shots?

3) If so, do you think JFK and JBC were hit by different bullets?

4) If so, in which Zapruder frame (approximately) was JFK hit, and in which frame (approximately) was JBC hit?

5) Thanks.

[Andrew Mason]

1) Do you think Oswald was the only shooter?

2) If so, do you think Oswald fired three shots?

3) If so, do you think JFK and JBC were hit by different bullets?

4) If so, in which Zapruder frame (approximately) was JFK hit, and in which frame (approximately) was JBC hit?

5) Thanks.

Unfortunately the board does not allow one to use crayon.

I said the conclusion that “three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.” is the conclusion that is not merely permitted from the evidence but is compelled by the evidence.

That should answer all your questions.

[Tom Mahon]

Unfortunately the board does not allow one to use crayon.

I said the conclusion that “three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.” is the conclusion that is not merely permitted from the evidence but is compelled by the evidence.

That should answer all your questions.

Are you afraid to tell us in which Zapruder frame shot number one hit (and whom it hit), shot number two hit (and whom it hit), and shot number three hit (and whom it hit)?