According to the autopsy doctors, the bullet that struck JFK's head hit near its hardest part -- the External Occipital Protuberance.
This is what happens when people don't think things through.
According to you the bullet that hit JFK's head because it "hit near it's hardest part", the EOP ("near" it? Doesn't that mean it missed that part of the skull - d'uhhh)
The radial bone is far thicker and more dense than "near" the EOP so, BY YOUR OWN LOGIC, the bullet must fragment when it strikes JBC's radial bone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f3ac/1f3ac8e85f98c4303806bc85e5e804e30beb1f03" alt="Roll Eyes ::)"
As a Nutter you must now indulge in some mental gymnastics to make your "logic" work.
Good luck with that.
Talking of mental gymnastics...John posted this:
Hi Tom, as the WC showed, a full speed bullet striking a human wrist would literally smash the wrist bone therefore for CE399 to only fracture Connally's wrist it must have been travelling slower! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5838c/5838c06a46e41778b8f39ca190c80c45e3ee9090" alt=""
There are two images of wrist x-rays.
One shows where a bullet has clearly passed through the radial bone. It has smashed a hole through the bone as we might expect.
The other image shows an x-ray of JBC's wrist. Although the bone is clearly shattered there is absolutely zero evidence that a bullet has passed through the bone.
The explanation for this discrepancy is that the bullet that passed through JBC's wrist
must have been travelling more slowly than the one that blasted a hole in the radial bone!! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac96f/ac96facccd836fefe222e9bfb6143b264f465eb5" alt="Huh? ???"
How does a slower moving bullet leave no evidence that it has passed through the bone?
The bone still has to be blasted out of the way the bullet to get through.
Surely the x-ray of JBC's wrist is proof that a bullet didn't pass through it. Isn't that the obvious explanation?
And hasn't it crossed anyone's mind that the exit "slit" on JBC's wrist is far smaller than the entrance wound on the dorsal side of his wrist.
Isn't that suggesting a fragmented bullet to anyone?
The bullet that struck JBC's wrist (CE-399) did not fragment -- probably because, having passed through JFK and JBC, it had slowed down quite a bit and because it was twirling when it struck said bone.
D'oh
"...twirling when it struck said bone" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8ecd/a8ecd7cc918d22579f996269ccd5e91eeac54f25" alt="Cheesy :D"
Twirling?
If that was the case it would have blown JBC's hand off at the wrist.
Instead, it left hardly any evidence that a bullet had passed through.
The injuries to Connally and the damage to his clothes demonstrate that there was no such twirling or tumbling.
This idea about a tumbling bullet HAD TO BE INTRODUCED to keep up the lie that CE399 was the bullet. Small fragments of metal were left in the wrist when the bullet fragmented. CE399 could not have left any kind of fragment if it created the wound nose-first as there was no material lost from the nose of the bullet. The only area any such fragments could've come from is the base of the bullet, therefore the idea that it turned around as it traveled had to be introduced.
The 'tumbling' theory is an invention, it is not supported by the evidence.
The bullet struck JBC's radial bone and fragmented. A small part of it passed through his wrist and the larger part lodged itself in his leg.
There is a little known story that when JBC was being moved from his stretcher onto the examination table in Parkland Hospital a bullet or large bullet fragment fell on the floor and was picked up by a nurse who was told by Henry Wade to give it to a police officer, which she did.