What's in the Next (Last?) Batch of JFK Files? Here's One View

[Jake Maxwell]

Aided by 65 years (it started in 1959) of KGB*-encouraged cynicism and apathy instilled in our body politic (via, for example, the anti-government conspiracy theories that sprang, with the KGB*'s help, from the anomaly-replete assassination of JFK by a sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald), The Traitorous Orange Xxxx (rhymes with bird) known as Donald J. Trump won the 2024 popular vote by only 1.5 percent -- hardly the "mandate" that his zombified supporters claim.

*Today's SVR and FSB

Here’s a better take on the recent election, by The Council on Foreign Relations:

“Trump won 77,284,118 votes, or 49.8 percent of the votes cast for president. That is the second highest vote total in U.S. history, trailing only the 81,284,666 votes that Joe Biden won in 2020. Trump won 3,059,799 more popular votes in 2024 than he won in 2020 and 14,299,293 more than he won in 2016.
He now holds the record for the most cumulative popular votes won by any presidential candidate in U.S. history, surpassing Barack Obama.”

[Allan Fritzke]

There will be nothing found as all contrarian evidence was shredded to make sure it was a LNer.  Like the J6 committee, everything was scrubbed.  They won't even find JFK's brain.  If there was mercury involved in the bullet, no evidence will be found.  If there is some documents left to view, they will still be heavily redacted and blacked out so that they would become meaningless.   Like the airplane that hit the Pentagon and all its heavy hi-level surveillance, there is maybe 1 picture and none with an airplane that skimmed the ground and knocked off lamp poles on its way in!   That is another story like bay of Tonkin and the USS Liberty as other prime examples.
...
Clearly the only evidence that make sense is that everyone rushed the grassy knoll and they all were mistaken?    The head's final throw was back into the seat - not caused by braking!    A trajectory (frangible no doubt) and pieces of skull and brain were on the trunk and blown out of the back!  2 shots within 6 frames is not a bolt action sniper rifle firing twice  from behind with the head going forward and then backward - impossible.  As one reporter said "2 shots in quick succession"!  I will believe that!

[Jake Maxwell]

There will be nothing found as all contrarian evidence was shredded to make sure it was a LNer.  Like the J6 committee, everything was scrubbed.  They won't even find JFK's brain.  If there was mercury involved in the bullet, no evidence will be found.  If there is some documents left to view, they will still be heavily redacted and blacked out so that they would become meaningless.   Like the airplane that hit the Pentagon and all its heavy hi-level surveillance, there is maybe 1 picture and none with an airplane that skimmed the ground and knocked off lamp poles on its way in!   That is another story like bay of Tonkin and the USS Liberty as other prime examples.
...
Clearly the only evidence that make sense is that everyone rushed the grassy knoll and they all were mistaken?    The head's final throw was back into the seat - not caused by braking!    A trajectory (frangible no doubt) and pieces of skull and brain were on the trunk and blown out of the back!  2 shots within 6 frames is not a bolt action sniper rifle firing twice  from behind with the head going forward and then backward - impossible.  As one reporter said "2 shots in quick succession"!  I will believe that!

You are very likely correct... sadly.
Yes... not caused by braking... no one else's head throw's back like JFK's...

The Grassy Knoll is rushed by the crowd, very likely because the fellow below sitting behind the bridge, and who possibly lied to the Warren Commission, made the fatal shot...

[Steve M. Galbraith]

There will be nothing found as all contrarian evidence was shredded to make sure it was a LNer.  Like the J6 committee, everything was scrubbed.  They won't even find JFK's brain.  If there was mercury involved in the bullet, no evidence will be found.  If there is some documents left to view, they will still be heavily redacted and blacked out so that they would become meaningless.   Like the airplane that hit the Pentagon and all its heavy hi-level surveillance, there is maybe 1 picture and none with an airplane that skimmed the ground and knocked off lamp poles on its way in!   That is another story like bay of Tonkin and the USS Liberty as other prime examples.
...
Clearly the only evidence that make sense is that everyone rushed the grassy knoll and they all were mistaken?    The head's final throw was back into the seat - not caused by braking!    A trajectory (frangible no doubt) and pieces of skull and brain were on the trunk and blown out of the back!  2 shots within 6 frames is not a bolt action sniper rifle firing twice  from behind with the head going forward and then backward - impossible.  As one reporter said "2 shots in quick succession"!  I will believe that!

Excuse me but just one question: What kind/type of bullet carries enough force/mass that can throw a body back the way you think JFK's body was by that same bullet? This isn't the movies where bullets throw people back, toss them around like rag dolls. A bullet simply doesn't carry enough force to throw a body around. If they did then why wasn't JFK's body thrown forward when he was shot in the back?

Anyway, you can look this up yourself. Don't trust me. The ballistics experts say it's not possible. Bullets can't throw a body around like they are dolls.

[Jim Hawthorn]

Hi Jim, I hope you are well.

But anyway, I find this piece of hearsay to be quite odd.

Is there any American evidence to support this claim from anyone?
Did President Ford say this to anyone in America, anyone?
How good was President Giscard d'Estaing's understanding of English or was there an interpreter?
Under what circumstances was this even bought up?
Was President Giscard d'Estaing a JFKA devotee?
President Ford says "We were sure..." which doesn't sound particularly convincing.
President Ford also says that they couldn't find who the exact organization was, that was behind the assassination, again not very convincing.

In 1999 Ex-President Ford made the following declaration that Ford believes that Oswald was the assassin and that the WC couldn't find any evidence of a conspiracy, which doesn't specifically refute his alleged interaction with Giscard but at the end of the day a gut instinct hunch goes nowhere and let's face it, the JFKA has since been investigated by hundreds or even thousands of keen researchers for perhaps millions of hours and still to this day not one investigator has found even a single shred of evidence of any conspiracy.

JohnM

I'm very well thank you John. I haven't been here for a while but the press activity about Trump ordering the release of files drew me back in.
President Giscard spoke fluent English. As I said, he was alone in the back of the limo with President Ford. I see no reason at all for Giscard to invent this. As you say, the fact that Ford said that no "evidence" had been found doesn't rule out the evident fact that they were sure that there had been a conspiracy.