On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 11 with Bill Brown

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-11-with-bill-brown[/b]]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-11-with-bill-brown

It was a delight to interview Bill, who is about as knowledgeable about the murder of Officer J. D. Tippit as anyone.

fred

[Steve M. Galbraith]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-11-with-bill-brown[/b]]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/on-the-trail-of-delusion-episode-11-with-bill-brown

It was a delight to interview Bill, who is about as knowledgeable about the murder of Officer J. D. Tippit as anyone.

fred

This is a first rate attempt to reconstruct the shooting of Tippit, to put the pieces together. He goes minute by minute, step-by-step and tries to recreate what happened. The Oswald defenders would be smart to try to follow this method, to put together their account of what happened. A Dallas gang killed Tippit? An angry husband? What?

I would suggest the reason they don't is because their alternative reconstruction simply cannot stand, it's a house of conspiracy cards. Benavides didn't identify the shooter. The timeline suggest an earlier shooting. Good, that's a start but that's not a reconstruction of what took place. It's simply a series of "Whatabouts?" that you think clears Oswald. But this isn't a trial; it's an attempt to explain an event. Give us your reconstruction, please.

It might be interesting if Bill reads this for him to give a steelman argument for the event. That is the best possible version of the opponents of the "Oswald killed Tippit" explanation. I can't think of one other than a series of corrupt acts - witnesses coerced to lie; evidence planted and switched - the same old same old conspiracy dodge.

[John Iacoletti]

The only thing that Bill's "reconstruction" proves is that you can make any timeline "work" if you make a whole bunch of non-evidence-based assumptions that are specifically designed to make it work.

But "it's not absolutely impossible" does not equal "happened".

[Bill Brown]

This is a first rate attempt to reconstruct the shooting of Tippit, to put the pieces together. He goes minute by minute, step-by-step and tries to recreate what happened. The Oswald defenders would be smart to try to follow this method, to put together their account of what happened. A Dallas gang killed Tippit? An angry husband? What?

I would suggest the reason they don't is because their alternative reconstruction simply cannot stand, it's a house of conspiracy cards. Benavides didn't identify the shooter. The timeline suggest an earlier shooting. Good, that's a start but that's not a reconstruction of what took place. It's simply a series of "Whatabouts?" that you think clears Oswald. But this isn't a trial; it's an attempt to explain an event. Give us your reconstruction, please.

It might be interesting if Bill reads this for him to give a steelman argument for the event. That is the best possible version of the opponents of the "Oswald killed Tippit" explanation. I can't think of one other than a series of corrupt acts - witnesses coerced to lie; evidence planted and switched - the same old same old conspiracy dodge.

Thanks Steve.

You're quite correct when you say an "alternative reconstruction simply cannot stand".  That is why one has never been done.

[David Von Pein]

I watched the Fred Litwin/Bill Brown video, and I very much enjoyed it. So much detailed information in there. And the graphics and the added video that was recorded in Oak Cliff are excellent....and very helpful. Thank you both.



-------------------------------------------------

"As time goes on, there are more and more conspiracy believers who seem to want to smear just about everyone connected with the Kennedy assassination except the person to whom all of the evidence leads---Lee H. Oswald.

Ruth Paine, Michael Paine, J.D. Tippit, Buell Frazier, Linnie Randle, Roy Truly, Marrion Baker, Will Fritz, Gerald Hill, Captain Westbrook, and many others are branded with the label of "suspicious" by many CTers. While Lee Harvey Oswald, who was the owner of both of the 11/22/63 murder weapons (which is a provable fact no matter what any conspiracy theorist today wants to believe), is considered by many to be merely an innocent "patsy" in BOTH of those Nov. 22 murders, despite the pile of evidence that exists against him.

The logic of such thinking completely escapes me."

-- David Von Pein; July 14, 2022

----------------------------------------------------------------

http://Quoting-Common-Sense.blogspot.com

----------------------------------------------------------------