On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 11 with Bill Brown

[John Mytton]

Thanks Martin that's a useful analogy, the exact same points of light when observed at night perfectly correspond to the cities below

I wasn't talking about cities, but I am glad you agree with me that those dots you are pointing to in your gif could easily be a couple of street lights.   

Isn't a Rorschachtest just a marvelous tool to see what you want to see?

Huh?

As usual, every time you open your mouth you dig a deeper hole, but do keep it up because you make this so easy!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Huh?

As usual, every time you open your mouth you dig a deeper hole, but do keep it up because you make this so easy!

JohnM

What's up, John?

Running out of things to say, so it's on to insults? It's getting old, John.... really old!

[John Mytton]

What's up, John?

Running out of things to say, so it's on to insults? It's getting old, John.... really old!

How on Earth can you say my kind words in any way constitute an insult, you first attempted to ridicule the JFKA evidence and in your haste you only reinforced my presented evidence, again thanks for playing!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

How on Earth can you say my kind words in any way constitute an insult, you first attempted to ridicule the JFKA evidence and in your haste you only reinforced my presented evidence, again thanks for playing!

JohnM

I don't think you even understand what it is your are trying to say here....

In any event, I apologize for not speaking or understanding gobbledygook.

[John Iacoletti]

Sorry John, there's nothing indistinct about the perfectly matching points of the random defects discovered on Day's first day lift from Oswald's rifle and the FBI lift from Oswald's rifle.

Sorry, "Mytton", but there is nothing that "perfectly matches" an indistinct smudge.  And if you look closely, the John Hunt photo of the index card print (which you ripped off without attribution) has "defects" that the Hoover smudge does not.  As if you even know that spots on a photograph are "defects".

Nice try, though.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

[John Mytton]

Sorry, "Mytton", but there is nothing that "perfectly matches" an indistinct smudge.  And if you look closely, the John Hunt photo of the index card print (which you ripped off without attribution) has "defects" that the Hoover smudge does not.  As if you even know that spots on a photograph are "defects".

Nice try, though.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

You can't make this up, so what you claim is an "indistinct smudge" can actually be closely inspected to reveal "defects", WOW, Thanks for your compliance!

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

You can't make this up, so what you claim is an "indistinct smudge" can actually be closely inspected to reveal "defects", WOW, Thanks for your compliance!

You imagination is not an "inspection".

[Tom Graves]

You can't make this up, so what you claim is an "indistinct smudge" can actually be closely inspected to reveal "defects", WOW, Thanks for your compliance!

JohnM

Iacoletti pulled a similar prank on me a few years ago when, struggling mightily to refute my claim that Gloria Calvery can be seen on the TSBD steps talking with some man (Billy Lovelady? Joe Molina? [fill in the blank]?) about 30 seconds after the assassination, and being his usual contrarian self after having constantly complained that I was "seeing things" and "making things up" in the "photographic blobs" I was viewing -- he referred to the big, tall, black-blouse-and-black-headscarf-wearing gal (Gloria Calvery) in the Betzner-3 photo as "Glasses-Wearing Woman," or some such thing instead of what I was calling her ("Black-Headscarf-Wearing Woman," iirc), and then, when he finally realized that Gloria Calvery always wore the same pair of large, ugly, black-framed glasses, he immediately stopped referring to that gal in Betzner-3 as "Glasses-Wearing-Woman"!!!

LOL!