JFK Assassination computer analysis video!

[Richard Smith]

Certainly not, as the authorities are in on it. The death squads are busy eliminating each other with no time to monitor. This could be your most retarded strawman ever. The fog must be terribly thick.

The authorities in 2025 are still in on "it"?  LOL.  Where will this conspiracy ever end?  It just goes on and on but that does make a good excuse for not taking your evidence out of the shadows of the Internet into the real world.  "Retarded" strawman?  If only Roger Collins was still with us.

[John Mytton]

Thanks for the video but it only illustrates everything wrong with relying on computer AI. Computers aren't intelligent, they can't reason, they aren't self aware, all that they can do is accumulate human provided resources and regurgitate it, and in this case since the vast, vast majority of input comes from insane conspiracy nonsense then that is what is regurgitated.
Garbage in Garbage out.
We are a long, long way away from computer juries and videos like this only strengthen that fact! And even though the current legal system may have flaws, it's the human input of reasoning and making human judgements that makes it the fairest system available.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Bugliosi has a short chapter in his book addressing the junk science and lunacy of the mysterious deaths hoax.  Again, though, if I were convinced that a death squad was at large killing dozens or hundreds of witnesses, I would be reluctant to point that out on a public forum that members of the death squad might be monitoring.  I would take that information to the authorities and let them deal with it.

Bugliosi has a short chapter in his book addressing the junk science and lunacy of the mysterious deaths hoax.

One of the very most popular and durable myths about the Kennedy assassination that conspiracy theorists have successfully peddled to millions of Americans is that witnesses who knew things that the conspirators who killed Kennedy didn’t want anyone to know met “mysterious” or “suspicious” deaths. The myth has many inherent weaknesses, just one of which is that once someone has already told his story, the cat, as the expression goes, “is already out of the bag.” And that’s one of the main reasons why the conspiracy theorists’ mysterious-deaths argument, first brought to national attention through a promotional campaign for the 1973 movie Executive Action, is lame on its face. Many of the witnesses who allegedly died mysteriously had already told their stories
Reclaiming History Vincent Bugliosi

[Tom Sorensen]

The authorities in 2025 are still in on "it"?  LOL.  Where will this conspiracy ever end?  It just goes on and on but that does make a good excuse for not taking your evidence out of the shadows of the Internet into the real world.  "Retarded" strawman?  If only Roger Collins was still with us.

So there would be self-guided death squads still around in 2025, "monitoring"? It was you who came up with the strawman that conspirators had sent out death squads that would replicate, no one else. You alone launched that insane idea.

[Tom Mahon]

So there would be self-guided death squads still around in 2025, "monitoring"? It was you who came up with the strawman that conspirators had sent out death squads that would replicate, no one else. You alone launched that insane idea.

How were all of those witnesses killed so mysteriously or murdered so obviously under false pretenses -- through spooky action at a distance?

Pardon the pun.

[Patrick Davies]

One of the very most popular and durable myths about the Kennedy assassination that conspiracy theorists have successfully peddled to millions of Americans is that witnesses who knew things that the conspirators who killed Kennedy didn’t want anyone to know met “mysterious” or “suspicious” deaths. The myth has many inherent weaknesses, just one of which is that once someone has already told his story, the cat, as the expression goes, “is already out of the bag.” And that’s one of the main reasons why the conspiracy theorists’ mysterious-deaths argument, first brought to national attention through a promotional campaign for the 1973 movie Executive Action, is lame on its face. Many of the witnesses who allegedly died mysteriously had already told their stories
Reclaiming History Vincent Bugliosi

Concerns about witness deaths were raised long before 1973, with early researchers like Penn Jones Jr. and Jim Marrs documenting them in the 1960s.
And how do you address the math? The core statistical improbability of so many witnesses meeting untimely or violent deaths in such a short span?

[Tom Sorensen]

How were all of those witnesses killed so mysteriously or murdered so obviously under false pretenses -- through spooky action at a distance?

Pardon the pun.

I never claimed they were. I like puns. No need for an excuse.

[Tom Mahon]

I never claimed they were. I like puns. No need for an excuse.

What's your excuse?