https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/the-parkland-doctors-part-two
The Parkland Doctors, Part Two
The Parkland doctors made many statements about what they saw, and there is no unanimity between them. Their statements are erratic and do not prove there was a blow-out in the back of Kennedy's head.
Excellent summary using *original* or primary sources and documents. They not only disagree with each other on what they saw; they disagree with themselves. It's fascinating how their answers change depending on who is asking them and how it's phrased. And when.
From the accounts I've read of the people who knew and worked with him Dr. McClelland was a fine man, a good doctor and person. But he's completely unreliable on this question. He didn't draw that Thompson picture even though he kept saying he did. And he admitted early on that he never saw the throat wound; by the time he was in the ER Perry had performed surgery on it. Later he's drawing pictures of the wound *before* the surgery, in its pristine state. Most important he said in his early accounts that the wound he saw was on the *side* of the head, not the back. Side not back. Sorry sir, you helped a lot of people, eased their suffering; but you simply cannot be believed here (yes, I know he's dead).
The ER doctors were in a rushed, shocking situation. They neither had the time or ability to closely examine the head wound. They were busy, as they said, trying to save the life of the patient. Again, here's the solution: have an autopsy. That will settle the question.
Dr. Aguilar's list of "back of the head" witnesses is, let's just say, questionable. As Lincoln said in the Gettysburg Address, don't trust anything you read on the internet.
Topic: The Parkland Doctors, Part Two (Read 102 times)