It's your thread, that you started with a plethora of mistakes and wrong assumptions which BTW you never acknowledged, and now it's my problem? Seriously?
I just asked a question. Stop being a drama queen!
But since you brought it up, how does showing a part of Bledsoe's testimony and two photos become "a plethora of mistakes and wrong assumptions"?
And no, it became your problem when you decided to join the conversation making all sorts of idiotic remarks that served no purpose at all.
The authorities were in the process of accumulating an excess of evidence to determine Oswald's flight from the scene of his crime.
Could you write this in Chinese? Perhaps I will then understand this gobbledigook.
Apparently not? Besides this clear diversion and the facts that I have already stated, please explain to me why you believe Oswald wearing the brown shirt on the bus was so important?
So, you can't answer my question? Got it!
And no, it became your problem when you decided to join the conversation making all sorts of idiotic remarks that served no purpose at all.
I only added clarity to your clear misinformation.
In your OP you inferred that the shirt didn't have a hole, you were wrong!
You posted a photo of what was supposed to be the "shirt" with the manufactures label, you were wrong!
You posted Oswald's brown shirt asking where was the hole but you posted the wrong side, you were wrong!
In every subsequent post you are yet to acknowledge or even attempt to correct your OP, and that's naughty!
So, you can't answer my question? Got it!
And here we go again when you're clearly stuck, more Martin games.
JohnM