Hold onto your hats Boys & Girls, Trump's releasing the final JFK files!

[Royell Storing]

That's the endless CTer rabbit hole.  The conspiracy can never be proven because someone is covering up the evidence.  An endless loop that can never be broken.  Like the dogs at the race track forever chasing that rabbit.  Even if you want to cling to that, it is still the most investigated criminal case in history.  It has been investigated by federal and state law enforcement authorities.  They have generated tens of millions pages of documents.  Independent "researchers" have investigated the case for decades.  This forum alone shows that just about every rock has been turned over searching for answers.  Even the pebbles.  I can't think of any other case in history that has received so much attention and pedantic nitpicking of every detail.

    Is: (1) Image Evidence that The Murder Scene/Dealey Plaza was altered Less than a month after 11/22/63,  (2)  Image Evidence of a male civilian with a rifle inside this same Murder Scene roughly 30 minutes after the Kill Shot, and, (3) Image Evidence of Curry & Fritz together, (DPD Top Cops), walking this same area, (outside of the TSBD), only days after the assassination, "CTer rabbit hole" material? 

[Royell Storing]

The secret service of 1963 was nothing like that of today in terms of resources.  The agents were older, fewer, and had a much more difficult task protecting the president riding on a preannounced route in an open car.  The question was not if but when something like this was going to happen.  There was really not much they could have done.  They had a few seconds to reach the car and shield JFK.  Likely getting killed in the process.  They certainly could have done a better job but not likely to change the outcome.

   We have guys like Max Holland now getting National Air Time in which they are promoting 10-11+ Seconds for the elapsed time of the 3 shots. There is No Way even back in 1963 that a shooter should be able to consistently fire shots at the POTUS for 10-11+ seconds and there be absolutely No offensive response from the SS. No Way.

[Richard Smith]

   We have guys like Max Holland now getting National Air Time in which they are promoting 10-11+ Seconds for the elapsed time of the 3 shots. There is No Way even back in 1963 that a shooter should be able to consistently fire shots at the POTUS for 10-11+ seconds and there be absolutely No offensive response from the SS. No Way.

I agree that they could have given a better effort but the circumstances put them in a no-win situation which is why the president no longer rides around in an open car on a preannounced route.  Are you saying that they were "in" on the fantasy plot or just ineffective?

[Charles Collins]

   We have guys like Max Holland now getting National Air Time in which they are promoting 10-11+ Seconds for the elapsed time of the 3 shots. There is No Way even back in 1963 that a shooter should be able to consistently fire shots at the POTUS for 10-11+ seconds and there be absolutely No offensive response from the SS. No Way.

Yes, Way and here's a few reasons why:

• It was a well executed ambush from behind and above which took everyone by surprise.
• The sniper was also mostly out of sight behind the boxes.
• Plus the fact that JFK insisted the SS agents not stay on the limo made any attempt to shield him in time very unlikely. We can see Clint Hill's valiant effort on film. But it was too little, too late thanks in large part to JFK's restriction regarding the positions of the SS agents.

The SS was legitimately criticized by the Warren Commission and changes were made. That was one of their main missions so as to try to prevent this type of attack from happening again.

[John Mytton]

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2025

JohnM

[Mark Ulrik]

At least some of them (1,123 documents / 31,419 pages so far).

[Tim Nickerson]

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/104-10211-10001.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawJHKy5leHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHeeln43eSC0-WZ8N2LCpHn7kg6O21qHGqgLOCsVv4QFjkBs4VSNAv0-okw_aem__FVHi3rSPsGrftNjFHjx0g

Notice anything.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/104-10211-10001.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawJHKy5leHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHeeln43eSC0-WZ8N2LCpHn7kg6O21qHGqgLOCsVv4QFjkBs4VSNAv0-okw_aem__FVHi3rSPsGrftNjFHjx0g

Notice anything.

It's hard to believe the Soviets would send someone so unprepared, so ignorant of basic information to impersonate an agent. Nosenko didn't know how to send a cable - the format; he didn't know where his office was in Lubyanka, how he got to it; he didn't know where the cafeteria was; he said he had been a Naval officer before joining the KGB but couldn't answer basic questions about the navy. On and on and on. The files reinforce this. If they're sending a fake, at least prepare him with the basic information. Not this.

On the other hand, Oleg Kalugin, who later became head of the KGB operations in the US, was in New York at the time and said there was absolute panic when they learned Nosenko defected. Numerous operations had to be shut down, agents returned home. He was even asked by his superior if he, Kalugin, would be willing to shoot Nosenko if they located him. Kalugin defected to the US and in response Putin put a death order on him.

Then on the third hand (this is the JFK assassination; things get complicated), Mailer interviewed over two dozen KGB agents who were assigned to watch Oswald when in Minsk. None mention anything about Nosenko.

There are fourth and fifth hands. At least.

Who and what to believe?