1) Let's say that, somehow knowing with absolute certainty that CE-399 caused neither JFK's nor JBC's wounds and having heard that it had allegedly been found by in Parkland Hospital by Tomlinson in Parkland Hospital, who had allegedly given it to Wright, who had allegedly given it to Johnsen, who had allegedly given it to Rowley, who had allegedly given it to Todd (who scratched his initial on it), 1) why do you think it was shot through Oswald's short-rifle, and 2) what is its significance in the JFK Assassination case?
2) Tomlinson, Johnsen, and Rowley refused to identify seven months later, or were unable to identify seven months later for the simple reason that it was seven months later and they hadn't put their initials on it?
3) If I understand your theory correctly, you believe that the bullet that struck JBC's wrist fragmented into large pieces and left about five small fragments in the wound, itself. If I'm right about that, how do you explain the fact that none of the test bullets that were fired through the wrists of cadavers fragmented into large pieces?
Very poor effort Tom. Here's your list of questions for you to answer rather than ask more inane questions:
1] How quickly was the bullet rotating?
2] If the bullet was rotating, how did it enter JBC's wrist base-first and then his thigh base-first?
3] In the pic below explain how the rotating bullet passed through the bone without leaving an appropriately sized hole.
4] In the pic below, explain how CE399 could have left the spread of metal fragments in the wound.
5] What do you mean when you use the word "sideswiped"?
6] In the pic below, how does the size of the hole in Connally's jacket suggest the bullet was tumbling?
7] Do you agree that the limo should have been treated like a crime scene?
8] Do you agree vital ballistic evidence may have ended up in the Secret Service's mop bucket?
And what do you dispute about the following paragraph?
Tomlinson, Wright, Johnsen and Rowley refused to identify CE399 as the bullet they handled that day.
O P Wright categorically denied that CE399 was the bullet he handled that day.
None of these men were asked to identify CE399 by the Warren Commission.
Wright and Johnsen were never asked to testify at all.
Rowley testified but was never asked about CE399.
Unbelievably, Tomlinson,the man who discovered the bullet in Parkland, testified AND WASN'T ASKED A SINGLE QUESTION ABOUT THE BULLET ITSELF!!
He wasn't shown the bullet to identify, he wasn't shown a picture of the bullet,
he wasn't even asked to describe it!FACT - CE399 was entered into evidence as the bullet found in Parkland without a single person vouching for it as such. NOBODY IDENTIFIED IT AS THE BULLET FOUND IN PARKLAND!
If I understand your theory correctly, you believe that the bullet that struck JBC's wrist fragmented into large pieces and left about five small fragments in the wound, itself. If I'm right about that, how do you explain the fact that none of the test bullets that were fired through the wrists of cadavers fragmented into large pieces?How do you explain that no test bullets fragmented they way the bullet did when it hit JFK's head?
Not even you are going to deny the bullet that hit JFK's head fragmented.
Why do you believe the bullet that hit JFK's head fragmented but the bullet that hit JBC's wrist bone didn't?
Tomlinson, Johnsen, and Rowley refused to identify seven months later, or were unable to identify seven months later for the simple reason that it was seven months later and they hadn't put their initials on it?D'uuhhh...I can't recogmize this elephant because I didn't put my initials on it
They didn't put their initials on CE399 because they'd never seen it. Tomlinson, Wright, Johnsen and Rowley all handled a pointed "hunting slug". Why do you think the WC Sham refused to ask any of these men to identify CE399? In case you're stuck, the answer is that they knew would describe a bullet that clearly was not CE399.
