You're starting to sound desperate, Lance.
As you well know, whatever Alyea said has no bearing on the testimonies and statements of the six officers I quoted in the OP.
You need to believe that Alyea somehow makes what these officers has to say, go away.
It doesn't.
Go back and read the OP.
Read what these officers have to say.
THERE IS ZERO UNCERTAINTY AS TO WHERE THE LUNCH REMAINS WERE DISCOVERED.
The right thing to do would be to acknowledge what these officers reported, accept it and accept the WC ignored what they had to say (a little like you're doing. Go figure.)
Why don't you give us an analysis of what the officers reported and why you think it doesn't matter 
Click your heels and repeat three times, "I will be rational, I will be rational, I will be rational."
Alyea's observations and statements have NO BEARING??? They would be the EXPLANATION. He says the lunch remains were found on the FIFTH floor and that he believes the officers' testimonies were untruthful efforts to be consistent with their mistaken reports. He was THERE and he expresses CERTAINTY on this. I don't know if he's correct, but to say his statement has no bearing is nonsense. Moreover, the officers' statements are not even consistent; even if they were true, they would not unequivocally establish the precise location. You likewise keep misstating the facts by your insistence the WC ignored all this. They did not ignore it. The officers' testimonies and BRW's statements are there for all to see. The WC was simply unable to resolve the inconsistencies and, like me, ultimately concluded it was unimportant. Your mantra that there is "zero uncertainty" is Conspiracy Goof wishful thinking - there is considerable uncertainty as to the location of the lunch remains and TOTAL UNCERTAINTY as to the significance, if any.
This is yet another issue that has been BEATEN TO DEATH for decades. Do you think you're breaking new ground or adding something new? WHAT'S THE POINT? If you want to expand the uncertainty about the lunch remains into BRW being a possible accomplice to the assassination, go for it - you're simply exposing the sheer irrationality of Conspiracy Thinking.
Here's an idea: Give us your theory in 50 words or less. Explain WHAT in BRW's ENTIRE LIFE would add any plausibility to him being involved in the JFKA in any way. If, in fact, he saw Oswald prepping for the JFKA and said "Oh, Lordy, Mr. Oswald, I don't know what you're about to do, but I'm gonna slide outta here and watch from the fifth floor," the significance would be WHAT? This is Conspiracy Thinking to the nth degree - take some utterly inconsequential piece of evidence and expand it into entirely speculative Evidence of Conspiracy with no regard whatsoever for context, logic or rationality.
