Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Lance Payette, Tom Graves, Royell Storing

Author Topic: The Warren Commission Sham  (Read 9480 times)

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #88 on: April 01, 2025, 03:40:45 AM »
Advertisement
Where is the WC testimony of Dorothy Garner?
Where is the WC testimony of Sandra Stiles?
Why did  FBI agent Odum deny having ever made a report that CE399 was verified?
Why was not a forensic autopsy expert selected to do the autopsy of JFK?
Bullet fragments said to be found in the limo, ( 3 under the seat of Mrs Connally) why were they not photographed in  the position they were said to be in, under that seat?
Why was the limo windshield and the limo itself not kept as evidence?
Why was the paraffin test of Oswald’s cheeks negative, when an experiment with 7 persons who fire a rifle show all 7 test  positive?
Why was it impossible to have a tape recording of Oswald’s interrogations and have an attorney present as well?
How could Oswalds blue jacket have been found in TSBD when Whaley the taxi driver said Oswald was wearing that jacket?
Why was  Earlene Roberts not able to confirm Oswald was wearing the light gray jacket when he left the boarding house?
Why was no gunpowder residue found on the jacket, shirt sleeves or T shirt of Oswald?
Was  there ever a report of gunpowder residue found in the breech, chamber or rifle grooves of the barrel of the MC rifle found on the 6th floor TSBD?

Are any of these questions relevant? 😳

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #88 on: April 01, 2025, 03:40:45 AM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 709
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #89 on: April 01, 2025, 05:20:49 AM »
Quote
Why did FBI agent Odum deny having ever made a report that CE399 was verified?

Question: How old was Odum in 2002 when he allegedly said that to Gary "Rudeness" Aguilar?

Answer: Eighty-two


« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 05:21:38 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 709
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #90 on: April 01, 2025, 06:37:33 AM »
Dan O'meara said:

Quote

I am totally convinced by the evidence that both JFK and JBC were simultaneously shot through by the same bullet.

There is not a chance that this bullet was CE-399


My comment:

Neutron activation analysis expert witness Vincent P. Guinn told the HSCA that the injures to Connally's wrist were very probably caused by CE-399




« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 06:48:45 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #90 on: April 01, 2025, 06:37:33 AM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3398
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #91 on: April 01, 2025, 10:39:08 AM »
Where is the WC testimony of Dorothy Garner?
Where is the WC testimony of Sandra Stiles?
Why did  FBI agent Odum deny having ever made a report that CE399 was verified?
Why was not a forensic autopsy expert selected to do the autopsy of JFK?
Bullet fragments said to be found in the limo, ( 3 under the seat of Mrs Connally) why were they not photographed in  the position they were said to be in, under that seat?
Why was the limo windshield and the limo itself not kept as evidence?
Why was the paraffin test of Oswald’s cheeks negative, when an experiment with 7 persons who fire a rifle show all 7 test  positive?
Why was it impossible to have a tape recording of Oswald’s interrogations and have an attorney present as well?
How could Oswalds blue jacket have been found in TSBD when Whaley the taxi driver said Oswald was wearing that jacket?
Why was  Earlene Roberts not able to confirm Oswald was wearing the light gray jacket when he left the boarding house?
Why was no gunpowder residue found on the jacket, shirt sleeves or T shirt of Oswald?
Was  there ever a report of gunpowder residue found in the breech, chamber or rifle grooves of the barrel of the MC rifle found on the 6th floor TSBD?

Are any of these questions relevant? 😳

Yes Zeon, these questions are relevant to this thread and others should be making the same contribution.
Why wasn't George Lumpkin asked to testify? He was the officer in charge of the TSBD until Fritz arrived. He was driving the lead car.
Why wasn't every single witness who saw the shooting close up asked to testify or, at least, give a full statement about what they saw and heard?
Why was there an agreement by the WC to have 'pre-interviews', where witnesses could be coached or their testimony manipulated before it went on record.
Why were CE 1381's designed to limit the witnesses reports?

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3398
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #92 on: April 01, 2025, 10:43:27 AM »
Dan O'meara said:


My comment:

Neutron activation analysis expert witness Vincent P. Guinn told the HSCA that the injures to Connally's wrist were very probably caused by CE-399

And Cyril Wecht, a man who had dealt with thousands of shooting incidents, reckoned they weren't.
So what?
What's your point?
Is that the sum total of your argument against that point?
All the ballistic testing involving bullets fired into the wrists of cadavers ALL produced bullets with massively deformed noses. How did Guinn explain that?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #92 on: April 01, 2025, 10:43:27 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #93 on: April 01, 2025, 11:58:24 AM »
All the ballistic testing involving bullets fired into the wrists of cadavers ALL produced bullets with massively deformed noses. How did Guinn explain that?
 

What's to explain? CE399 was slowed by Kennedy's neck and further slowed by Connally's torso and this massively slowed bullet went on to only fracture Connally's wrist and in addition CE399 left behind lead fragments which indicates that CE399 tumbled backwards into Connally's wrist, whereas a full speed bullet as you rightfully point out will smash a wrist and severely deform the nose.



JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3132
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #94 on: April 01, 2025, 03:43:27 PM »
 OK. And what was the condition of the alleged Carcano Bullet that rendered the Kill Shot? Yeah, thought so.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 03:44:14 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #95 on: April 01, 2025, 04:19:28 PM »
OK. And what was the condition of the alleged Carcano Bullet that rendered the Kill Shot? Yeah, thought so.

Oops!
I'll add "Ballistics Ignoramus" to your list of failures!

Mr. SPECTER. I now hand you a case containing bullet fragments marked Commission Exhibit 857 and ask if you have ever seen those fragments before.
Dr. OLIVIER. Yes, I have.
Mr. SPECTER. And under what circumstances have you viewed those before, please?
Dr. OLIVIER. There were, the two larger fragments were recovered outside of the skull in the cotton waste we were using to catch the fragments without deforming them. There are some smaller fragments in here that were obtained from the gelatin within the cranial cavity after the experiment. We melted the gelatin out and recovered the smallest fragments from within the cranial cavity.
Mr. SPECTER. Now, I show you two fragments designated as Commission Exhibits 567 and 579 heretofore identified as having been found on the front seat of the President's car on November 22, 1963, and ask you if you have had an opportunity to examine those before.
Dr. OLIVIER. Yes, I have.
Mr. SPECTER. And have you had an opportunity to compare those to the two fragments identified as Commission Exhibit 857?
Dr. OLIVIER. Yes, I have.
Mr. SPECTER. And what did that comparison show?
Dr. OLIVIER. They are quite similar.






JohnM
« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 04:24:35 PM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #95 on: April 01, 2025, 04:19:28 PM »