Those mysterious frontal gunmen

[Royell Storing]

 That is Not a "BROWN Cardigan", no matter how hard you guys try to make people believe that. And on top of that, you can see the man's bare arm from the wrist to up beyond the elbow. This "brown cardigan" mantra is right in line with trying to convince people there are 3 men standing at the bottom of The Steps on Willis 5. Total baloney.

[Joe Elliott]

   You need to open your mind. What makes you believe all shooters would be working together?

One should never open one's mind to the point one's brain falls out.

If there were multiple shooters was it by coincidence they showed up at the same place?

If brought in, does it make sense for the 'boss' would perfer them to be unaware of each other? That one missed shot might freeze another shooter as he would be wondering what the hell is going on?

[Royell Storing]

One should never open one's mind to the point one's brain falls out.

If there were multiple shooters was it by coincidence they showed up at the same place?

If brought in, does it make sense for the 'boss' would perfer them to be unaware of each other? That one missed shot might freeze another shooter as he would be wondering what the hell is going on?

   You must be unfamiliar with the CIA and FBI using the "compartmentalize" approach to everything they do. The right hand Never knows what the left hand is doing. It's Not my job to school ya, but "You're Welcome" just the same.

[Steve Barber]

That is Not a "BROWN Cardigan", no matter how hard you guys try to make people believe that. And on top of that, you can see the man's bare arm from the wrist to up beyond the elbow. This "brown cardigan" mantra is right in line with trying to convince people there are 3 men standing at the bottom of The Steps on Willis 5. Total baloney.

 This is the man on the steps, next to Hudson.  He is not wearing anything white except whatever he is wearing beneath his sweater/jacket, white T-shirt or white sports/dress shirt. 
This frame is from the Darnell film.  He's standing with his wife and baby in front of the park bench where they were seated prior to the man going down the stairs. Note the mans posture.  It's identical to the man seen in Willis slide 5 standing next to Hudson.

[Lance Payette]

I love it! I start a thread about how the very notion of frontal gunmen makes no rational sense, and by page 2 we're discussing multiple compartmentalized shooters and Brown Cardigan Man! I believe this is known as "business as usual" at an internet forum ...

Well, hell, maybe I'll invent a narrative to go with Oatmeal-Faced Alien Man and launch an entirely new Conspiracy Factoid.

[Royell Storing]

This is the man on the steps, next to Hudson.  He is not wearing anything white except whatever he is wearing beneath his sweater/jacket, white T-shirt or white sports/dress shirt. 
This frame is from the Darnell film.  He's standing with his wife and baby in front of the park bench where they were seated prior to the man going down the stairs. Note the mans posture.  It's identical to the man seen in Willis slide 5 standing next to Hudson.

   Any Adult seated on that bench would have been at a level well above the top of the short wall. ALL the images taken at the time of the Kill Shot and immediately thereafter do NOT show anyone seated on that Bench. The Woman You continue claiming was sitting on that bench? NOPE! And the man running Up-the-steps on the NIX FILM is wearing a WHITE SHIRT. This is clear. You continue pushing some very old and very erroneous JFK Assassination "tales". Please go back and do some research using the much improved assassination image clarity. Technology has passed you and the "tales" you tell by.   

[Steve Barber]

   Any Adult seated on that bench would have been at a level well above the top of the short wall. ALL the images taken at the time of the Kill Shot and immediately thereafter do NOT show anyone seated on that Bench. The Woman You continue claiming was sitting on that bench? NOPE! And the man running Up-the-steps on the NIX FILM is wearing a WHITE SHIRT. This is clear. You continue pushing some very old and very erroneous JFK Assassination "tales". Please go back and do some research using the much improved assassination image clarity. Technology has passed you and the "tales" you tell by.   

  Marie Muchmore's film, and Mary Ann Moorman Krahmer's Polaroid snapshot both show the same man standing on the step beside Emmet Hudson.
The Muchmore film shows the man beginning to turn and run up the stairs, and the Nix film captures him in flight. 

 We've all been through this with you before, and you continue to say the man in the Nix film is wearing a "white shirt".  It certainly is not white by any stretch, and it's the same man captured in the Moorman Krahmer Polaroid, the Willis #5 slide, the Nix and Muchmore films, as well as the James Darnell footage.  Live with it.

[Royell Storing]

  Marie Muchmore's film, and Mary Ann Moorman Krahmer's Polaroid snapshot both show the same man standing on the step beside Emmet Hudson.
The Muchmore film shows the man beginning to turn and run up the stairs, and the Nix film captures him in flight. 

 We've all been through this with you before, and you continue to say the man in the Nix film is wearing a "white shirt".  It certainly is not white by any stretch, and it's the same man captured in the Moorman Krahmer Polaroid, the Willis #5 slide, the Nix and Muchmore films, as well as the James Darnell footage.  Live with it.

       Steve, you have done nothing with respect to this case for decades now. It has passed you by. You have No Idea what has recently been done, or what is currently being done. You cling to this OLD Stuff like the lady sitting on the bench, 3 guys standing at the bottom of The Steps on Willis 5, the cardigan man, and all of this has already been 86'd. But, you continue rerunning it because you and the other Old Time JFK Assassination Researchers have nothing else to contribute. Why? Because you are inactive. There's an entirely new generation that have dug into this case and turned many of these Old Time Assassination Conclusions, (like you are proffering), inside out. Researchers like Holland and Posner are aware of this and are desperately trying to change the previously accepted JFK Assassination ground rules. They are doing this in order to try and keep themselves and their LN supporting "evidence" relevant. Your spouting this old stuff only Proves 1 thing. Your day is done.