Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those mysterious frontal gunmen  (Read 15422 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 886
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #48 on: April 04, 2025, 05:08:21 AM »
Advertisement
Like you can prove what the murder weapon was or who owned it.

Only with unsubstantiated claims like "he was photographed with it".

Hilarious.

Did the evil, evil, evil bad guys and/or or the evil, evil, evil bad gals put Oswald's prints on the short-rifle that's alleged to have belonged to him?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #48 on: April 04, 2025, 05:08:21 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11207
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #49 on: April 05, 2025, 06:50:01 PM »
Did the evil, evil, evil bad guys and/or or the evil, evil, evil bad gals put Oswald's prints on the short-rifle that's alleged to have belonged to him?

Oswald's partial palmprint was found on an index card.

Online Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1275
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #50 on: April 05, 2025, 07:16:55 PM »
The doctors in the film contend one of the bullets that hit JFK entered through his throat, meaning it was an entrance wound from the front — and that there were potentially two gunmen, with Oswald firing from the rear.

In this exclusive clip from JFK: What the Doctors Saw, two of the Parkland doctors remember the initial testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry, the surgeon who attended to JFK (and later Oswald).

“So, at the press conference, Dr. Perry, in describing the [throat] wound here, said that he thought it looked like an entrance wound,” offers Dr. Robert McClelland in the doc clip.


https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/jfk-assassination-parkland-hospital-doctors-entrance-wound-two-gunmen-1234876218/



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #50 on: April 05, 2025, 07:16:55 PM »


Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #51 on: April 05, 2025, 07:55:37 PM »
The doctors in the film contend one of the bullets that hit JFK entered through his throat, meaning it was an entrance wound from the front — and that there were potentially two gunmen, with Oswald firing from the rear.

In this exclusive clip from JFK: What the Doctors Saw, two of the Parkland doctors remember the initial testimony of Dr. Malcolm Perry, the surgeon who attended to JFK (and later Oswald).

“So, at the press conference, Dr. Perry, in describing the [throat] wound here, said that he thought it looked like an entrance wound,” offers Dr. Robert McClelland in the doc clip.


Yes, Jim Carrico M.D. was the first physician to treat Kennedy in the trauma room and he was the first to notice the small bubbling wound in the front of the neck. The doctors recognised this as an entrance wound.

So the question is: is it possible for an exit wound from a ball-headed bullet to be very small like that?




Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #52 on: April 06, 2025, 08:58:12 AM »
   With respect to WILLIS 5:  "...not enough image information to Deny that there is 3 Men with 1 man partially obscured by the one in front'. When has it EVER been PROVEN that there are 3 Men standing at the bottom of The Steps on Willis 5? It NEVER has been Proven. The Old Guard JFK Assassination Researchers have simply Agreed among themselves that are 3 Men standing there. That's PROOF of Nothing. That's merely an Agreement on the level of the Secret Handshake used by Den 3, Pack #625, Cub Scouts of America. The MISSING 3rd Man in Willis 5 is Emmitt Hudson. Hudson was wearing Lightly Colored Slacks and a Whitish BRIGHT Hat on 11/22/63. Where is there any trace of Lightly Colored Slacks, (either leg), or a White'ish BRIGHT Hat anywhere in the Willis 5 photo? There is absolutely NO trace of Hudson's Lightly Colored Slacks from the ground upward, or his WHITE Hat from Head Height Downward. Just tell me what You actually SEE on Willis 5. NOT what you Think is Supposed to be there. That 3rd Man is simply NOT THERE on Willis 5.
   With respect to the NIX FILM - We see the BACK of the WHITE SHIRT MAN as he moves Up-the-Steps. His WHITE Shirt is covering his entire BACK. The man wearing a GREEN Cardigan would have his GREEN Cardigan covering his entire BACK. We see absolutely NO GREEN on the BACK of the WHITE SHIRT MAN as he moves Up-the-steps. NONE! ALL we see is WHITE. Total WHITE! And do Not forget that the Original NIX FLIM has been missing for decades.
    We have a Stark Discrepancy between assassination images. These images flat-out contradict each other.  Just tell this Forum what you actually SEE on these assassination images. NOT what you Think should be there.

"His WHITE Shirt is covering his entire BACK"
Royell, get it together. What you are seeing is the intense sunlight reflecting off the tan cardigan! Look at how the sun reflects of his shoulder which is clothed in his tan cargigan - it looks white!

« Last Edit: April 06, 2025, 09:04:46 AM by Jim Hawthorn »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #52 on: April 06, 2025, 08:58:12 AM »


Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4749
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #53 on: April 06, 2025, 09:30:42 AM »
"His WHITE Shirt is covering his entire BACK"
Royell, get it together. What you are seeing is the intense sunlight reflecting off the tan cardigan! Look at how the sun reflects of his shoulder which is clothed in his tan cargigan - it looks white!



This is a high resolution Nix frame, Storing's belief comes from an undisclosed YouTube video and if Storing had a shred of credibility he would post a link, but even then the process of copying and pasting a link is beyond Storing's technical abilities.

In this frame there is a number of white objects like the wall and the cop's helmet and the brown cardigan is not even close, so whatever Storing was looking at was either highly processed, was suffering from YouTube compression or this is just another attention seeking game typical of Storing.



JohnM

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 886
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #54 on: April 06, 2025, 09:44:31 AM »
Oswald's partial palmprint was found on an index card.

Should it not have been put on an index card?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3224
Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #55 on: April 06, 2025, 04:55:11 PM »

    With respect to the NIX FILM showing the Man moving Up-The Steps, how about just telling this forum what you actually SEE? Not what that man Should be wearing, or how the Objects around him look. WHAT COLOR do you SEE across the Back of this man? The shirt on his BACK is WHITE, and this White Shirt Man is corroborated in the WC Testimony of Lee Bowers. Bowers gave WC Testimony as to SEEING a WHITE SHIRT MAN (S) of the E-W Picket Fence, "in line" with the Triple Underpass. Corroborated SLAM DUNK!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those mysterious frontal gunmen
« Reply #55 on: April 06, 2025, 04:55:11 PM »