Take your “conspiracy evidence” to the FBI

[Charles Collins]

Just a suggestion for all the people who believe that they have uncovered some sort of evidence of a conspiracy. Stop complaining about things and do something about it. This is still an open case (and will be an open case forever) as far as the FBI is concerned.

A snip from “History Will Prove Us Right” by Howard Willens, page 402:

When he appeared before the commission, Hoover had testified about a possible conspiracy: I know of no substantial evidence of any type that would support any contention of that character. I have read all of the requests that have come to the Bureau from this Commission, and I have read and signed all the replies that have come to the Commission. In addition, I have read many of the reports that our agents have made and I have been unable to find any scintilla of evidence showing any foreign conspiracy or any domestic conspiracy that culminated in the assassination of President Kennedy. Hoover assured the commission that “so far as the FBI is concerned, the case will be continued in an open classification for all time. That is, any information coming to us or any report coming to us from any source will be thoroughly investigated, so that we will be able to either prove or disprove the allegation.”28

Take your “evidence” to someone who you believe that you can trust if you get no satisfaction from the FBI. There are multitudes of reporters who will be more than delighted to publicize your “evidence” (if you really have any).

[Tom Graves]

Take your “evidence” to someone who you believe that you can trust if you get no satisfaction from the FBI. There are multitudes of reporters who will be more than delighted to publicize your “evidence” (if you really have any).

To Kash Patel?

LOL!

[Tom Graves]

Just a suggestion for all the people who believe that they have uncovered some sort of evidence of a conspiracy. Stop complaining about things and do something about it. This is still an open case (and will be an open case forever) as far as the FBI is concerned. [...] Take your “evidence” to someone who you believe that you can trust if you get no satisfaction from the FBI. There are multitudes of reporters who will be more than delighted to publicize your “evidence” (if you really have any).

LOL!

Beginning on 16 December 2016, former Watergate attorney Douglas Caddy notified Robert Mueller (and later James Comey) by registered mail that in early 2016, he, at the urgent request of acquaintance Harley Schlanger of the far-right, pro-Russia Lyndon LaRoche organization, set up a meeting in Houston between recently-returned-from-Moscow Schlanger and Roger Stone. Caddy says he received a "thank you" e-mail from Stone afterwards in which he said he and Schlanger were "fighting the Globalists" and that he had "a backchannel to Trump."

Caddy never heard back from Comey or Mueller.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/24173-attorneys-file-on-roger-stone-larouche-and-russia-influencing-the-2016-presidential-election/

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/26617-my-2017-letter-to-special-counsel-robert-mueller-about-roger-stone/

[Lance Payette]

Better yet, assemble your absolute best case for whatever your factoid happens to be - just one, narrowly focused factoid that you think cannot be explained by the LN narrative - and take it to a recognized historical, medical, forensic or legal journal (whichever is most appropriate) and see if it survives (1) the threshold editorial review to be assigned for peer-review, and (2) the peer-review process itself. Improve your chances by having some fellow conspiracy enthusiast with impressive academic credentials sponsor you. Let us know how it goes.

O'Meara, Dan. "Chicken Bones in the Sniper's Nest: Zero Uncertainty the Warren Commission was a Sham," Journal of American History, Vol. IX, pp. 63-147 (Sept. 2026).

or perhaps

Storing, Royell. "Case Closed: Brown Cardigan Man was a Time Traveler," Journal of the Royal Society of Quantum Physics, pp. 18-112 (Summer 2027).

Well, maybe not. But something like that.

[Lance Payette]

LOL!

Beginning on 16 December 2016, former Watergate attorney Douglas Caddy notified Robert Mueller (and later James Comey) by registered mail that in early 2016, he, at the urgent request of acquaintance Harley Schlanger of the far-right, pro-Russia Lyndon LaRoche organization, set up a meeting in Houston between recently-returned-from-Moscow Schlanger and Roger Stone. Caddy says he received a "thank you" e-mail from Stone afterwards in which he said he and Schlanger were "fighting the Globalists" and that he had "a backchannel to Trump."

Caddy never heard back from Comey or Mueller.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/24173-attorneys-file-on-roger-stone-larouche-and-russia-influencing-the-2016-presidential-election/

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/26617-my-2017-letter-to-special-counsel-robert-mueller-about-roger-stone/

Gee, I don't know, but do ya think the fact that poor old Douglas Caddy has been promoting for years and years the narrative that JFK was killed because he was about to reveal the Alien Presence might, just might, have influenced Comey and Mueller? Just thinking out loud here ...

(I forget to mention, as further fodder for the suspicion that I am a CIA plant, that I was quite close both personally and professionally to Richard Kleindienst, Nixon's AG when Watergate occurred, in his last few years. Perhaps the most gentlemanly man I've ever met. Alas, he knew nothing about the JFKA or the Alien Presence.)

[Tom Graves]

Gee, I don't know, but do ya think the fact that poor old Douglas Caddy has been promoting for years and years the narrative that JFK was killed because he was about to reveal the Alien Presence might, just might, have influenced Comey and Mueller?

Do you think Caddy's nuttiness regarding UFOs and The Alien Presence (which he claims E. H. Hunt told him was the CIA's reason for killing JFK) precludes him from having, at Schlanger's request, set up a meeting between Schlanger and Stone soon after the former returned from Moscow (where he attended the RT gala dinner on 12/10/15?), and his having received a "thank you" e-mail from the latter saying he had a "back channel" to Trump even though he'd left the Trump Campaign several months earlier?

It seems to me that, in view of The Hacks and Assange's Timely Dumps, now-leftist Caddy, suspecting that Schlanger and Stone had something to do with it, was proactively trying to protect himself from any possible legal ramifications for having done such a foolish favor for his far-right former colleagues.

[John Iacoletti]

Better yet, assemble your absolute best case for whatever your factoid happens to be - just one, narrowly focused factoid that you think cannot be explained by the LN narrative - and take it to a recognized historical, medical, forensic or legal journal (whichever is most appropriate) and see if it survives (1) the threshold editorial review to be assigned for peer-review, and (2) the peer-review process itself. Improve your chances by having some fellow conspiracy enthusiast with impressive academic credentials sponsor you. Let us know how it goes.

O'Meara, Dan. "Chicken Bones in the Sniper's Nest: Zero Uncertainty the Warren Commission was a Sham," Journal of American History, Vol. IX, pp. 63-147 (Sept. 2026).

or perhaps

Storing, Royell. "Case Closed: Brown Cardigan Man was a Time Traveler," Journal of the Royal Society of Quantum Physics, pp. 18-112 (Summer 2027).

Well, maybe not. But something like that.

I must have missed the peer-reviewed journal that vetted the Warren Commission Report.

[John Mytton]

I must have missed the peer-reviewed journal that vetted the Warren Commission Report.

JohnM