JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-s-autopsy-photographs-are-authentic

JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic

The Boston Globe in 1981 got permission to have a professional panel examine all 52 of JFK"s autopsy photographs. They listened to Robert Groden's case that some had been altered. In the end, they unanimously agreed that the photographs were authentic.

[Jarrett Smith]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-s-autopsy-photographs-are-authentic

JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic

The Boston Globe in 1981 got permission to have a professional panel examine all 52 of JFK"s autopsy photographs. They listened to Robert Groden's case that some had been altered. In the end, they unanimously agreed that the photographs were authentic.

I trust the people who were actually at the autopsy over a panel of "professionals". Was Tom Robinson the mortician allowed to examine the photos?

[Royell Storing]

  I never like experts going privately going into a "back room" like the above. Even the Parkland Dr's going into a backroom and looking at alleged autopsy photos is a sketchy process. We can Not be Certain as to what any of these people/experts are looking at. Are they looking at different autopsy photos than We/Joe 6 Packs have looked at? We simply do Not know. Agreeing with the findings of this very restrictive "process" is like buying into David Copperfield sawing that lady in half. 

[Michael Capasse]

"In the 1990s, some Parkland doctors, including those involved in the initial treatment of President Kennedy, disputed the accuracy of the autopsy photographs, particularly regarding a large wound in the back of the president's head that some witnesses claimed to have seen but which was not depicted in the photos"
https://jfk.boards.net/post/7724

This is should be the required reading re: the JFK Autopsy...
HOW FIVE INVESTIGATIONS INTO JFK’S MEDICAL/AUTOPSY EVIDENCE GOT IT WRONG
https://history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/How5Investigations/How5InvestigationsGotItWrong_5.htm

[Royell Storing]

   I have accepted your sword. There is no disgrace in Standing Down.

[Michael Capasse]

   I have accepted your sword. There is no disgrace in Standing Down.

I have no idea what this means

[Steve M. Galbraith]

I trust the people who were actually at the autopsy over a panel of "professionals". Was Tom Robinson the mortician allowed to examine the photos?

Sorry, how would a mortician, Tom Robinson, know whether the photos were altered or not? Did he have any background in the subject? And would he remember what the photos should have looked like almost 20 years later?

According to the timeline that seems to me most accurate, he arrived with the embalming team after the autopsy began at around 11:00.  Then watched it from the spectator's area before beginning the embalming. So he arrives some three hours after the autopsy began, was watching from the gallery, and can tell what the body looked like when the photos were taken? I am skeptical.

Yes, experts can be wrong. But we need to point where they are wrong and not simply dismiss them.

[Royell Storing]

Sorry, how would a mortician, Tom Robinson, know whether the photos were altered or not? Did he have any background in the subject? And would he remember what the photos should have looked like almost 20 years later? According to the timeline that seems to me most accurate, he arrived with a coffin *after* the autopsy began and then watched it from the spectator's area. So he's watching from the gallery and can tell what the body looked like? I am skeptical.

Yes, experts can be wrong. But we need to point where they are wrong and not simply dismiss them.

   With respect to Robinson, I believe his recollections would be restricted to JFK's HEAD. Robinson applied a Patch of sorts over the Large Exit Wound in the back of JFK's head. I believe a mortician doing detailed work such as this to a POTUS would be remembered in detail. Also, Robinson believed he was preparing the JFK Body for an Open Casket Viewing. I believe this expectation would further make Robinson's work meticulous and therefore memory stamped.