The Parkland Doctors, Part Four

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/the-parkland-doctors-part-four

The Parkland Doctors, Part Four

A good article about the Parkland doctors. 

In fact, Dr. Jenkins doubts if any of the Parkland physicians even had a good look at the President's head, explaining, "I was standing at the head of the table in the position the anesthesiologist most often assumes closest to the patient's head. My presence there and the President's great shock of hair and the location of the head wound were such that it was not visible to those standing down each side of the gurney where they were carrying out their resuscitative maneuvers."

[Royell Storing]

    The attempted case being made has reached a dead end when a Witness is telling the jury what Somebody Else saw. There was blood/brain matter oozing outta JFK, Down onto the gurney, and from the gurney Down onto the floor of Trauma Room 1 with each compression of external cardiac massage that was applied. The patient was laying face up. That "stuff" ain't coming outta his big toe. 

[Jim Hawthorn]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/the-parkland-doctors-part-four

The Parkland Doctors, Part Four

A good article about the Parkland doctors. 

In fact, Dr. Jenkins doubts if any of the Parkland physicians even had a good look at the President's head, explaining, "I was standing at the head of the table in the position the anesthesiologist most often assumes closest to the patient's head. My presence there and the President's great shock of hair and the location of the head wound were such that it was not visible to those standing down each side of the gurney where they were carrying out their resuscitative maneuvers."

An interesting part of that press article:

"...Jim Carrico, MD, a fist-year surgical resident, was the first physician to treat Kennedy, at 12:35 PM, and the first to notice the small bubbling wound in the front of the neck that necessitated the tracheostomy."

How could it be that the bullet caused only a small exit hole in Kennedy's throat but a huge exit hole under Connally's nipple?

Are we to assume that the bullet was travelling faster as it exited Kennedy than it did exiting Connally (being slowed by its passage through Connally's chest)? Do faster bullets leave smaller exit wounds?

[Fred Litwin]

The bullet was tumbling and so that is why the wounds are different.

[Jim Hawthorn]

The bullet was tumbling and so that is why the wounds are different.

...and yet the exit hole in Connally's suit was a perfect little round hole. Explain.

[Lance Payette]

...and yet the exit hole in Connally's suit was a perfect little round hole. Explain.

Since I'm a fair and reasonable provisional LNer (F&RPLNer), here's a good article by Ben Cole, another researcher I respect, addressing your point:

https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/the-death-of-the-tumbling-magic-bullet-theory-the-governor-s-shirt-the-president-s-shirt-and-the-overlooked-dr-robert-shaw

An earlier one from Millcent Cranor:

https://history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/BigLieSmallWound/BigLieSmallWound.htm

Sure, the SBT is problematical. I wish more thought were given to outside-the-box thinking - the two-shot theory, the shallow back wound possibility, the throat wound as a fragment from the head wound possibility, etc. Put together (1) the testimony two shots were very close together, (2) the alignment of the holes in JFK's coat and shirt with the back and throat wounds, (3) the SBT and (4) the Magic Bullet and it's enough to give even a F&RPLNer pause about the standard narrative.

[Royell Storing]

An interesting part of that press article:

"...Jim Carrico, MD, a fist-year surgical resident, was the first physician to treat Kennedy, at 12:35 PM, and the first to notice the small bubbling wound in the front of the neck that necessitated the tracheostomy."

How could it be that the bullet caused only a small exit hole in Kennedy's throat but a huge exit hole under Connally's nipple?

Are we to assume that the bullet was travelling faster as it exited Kennedy than it did exiting Connally (being slowed by its passage through Connally's chest)? Do faster bullets leave smaller exit wounds?

    Along with allegedly making a neat little Exit wound in the neck of JFK, you have the same gun/same ammo somehow EXPLODING JFK'S HEAD on contact. Ridiculous!

[Jim Hawthorn]

    Along with allegedly making a neat little Exit wound in the neck of JFK, you have the same gun/same ammo somehow EXPLODING JFK'S HEAD on contact. Ridiculous!

I'm no so sure. The head shot bullet trajectory was glancing blow into hard bone whereas the back/neck shot simply tore through muscle/flesh. It's understandable that the effect on the bullets would be very different.