Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?  (Read 444 times)

Online Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #8 on: Today at 12:50:04 AM »
Advertisement
Consciousness of guilt.

Oswald wasn’t the only employee to leave the Book Depository after Kennedy was shot. Were they all guilty?

No one has been able to prove that he was on the sixth floor when the shots were fired.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #8 on: Today at 12:50:04 AM »


Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4669
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #9 on: Today at 12:57:13 AM »
Oswald wasn’t the only employee to leave the Book Depository after Kennedy was shot. Were they all guilty?

How many employees left with 3 minutes of the assassination?
How many employees owned the rifle on the 6th floor which was directly linked to the bullet fragments found in the Limo?
How many employees got on and off a slow moving bus, caught a cab and got out way past where the lived?
How many employees went to their residence and got a revolver?
How many employees killed a cop?
How many employees snuck into a theatre, resisted arrest and tried to kill more cops?
How many employees were arrested and told one provable lie after another?

Can you name one other employee that satisfied even one of those criteria?

JohnM
« Last Edit: Today at 12:58:58 AM by John Mytton »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11148
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #10 on: Today at 01:12:11 AM »
Well, Duh!

In the law of evidence, consciousness of guilt is a type of circumstantial evidence that judges, prosecutors, and juries may consider when determining whether a defendant is guilty of a criminal offense. It is often admissible evidence,[1] and judges are required to instruct juries on this form of evidence.[2] Deceptive statements or evasive actions made by a defendant after the commission of a crime or other wrongdoing are seen as evidence of a guilty conscience. These are not the typical behaviors of an innocent person, and a "defendant's actions are compared unfavorably to what a normal, innocent person would have done, with the implication that the discrepancy indicates guilt".[3][/b]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_of_guilt

At some point you have to have some actual evidence.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #10 on: Today at 01:12:11 AM »


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11148
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #11 on: Today at 01:14:16 AM »
How many employees left with 3 minutes of the assassination?
How many employees owned the rifle on the 6th floor which was directly linked to the bullet fragments found in the Limo?
How many employees got on and off a slow moving bus, caught a cab and got out way past where the lived?
How many employees went to their residence and got a revolver?
How many employees killed a cop?
How many employees snuck into a theatre, resisted arrest and tried to kill more cops?
How many employees were arrested and told one provable lie after another?

Can you name one other employee that satisfied even one of those criteria?

You forgot to even prove that Oswald satisfied those criteria.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4669
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #12 on: Today at 01:31:36 AM »
At some point you have to have some actual evidence.

Another mindless one liner. Yawn!

Not even you can deny there is a literal mountain of evidence in this case, the fact that you keep saying/implying the incriminating evidence was fabricated, planted and lied about, is for you to prove and so far after 60+ years not one of your fellow CK's have proven even one piece of evidence is fraudulent!

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #12 on: Today at 01:31:36 AM »


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11148
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #13 on: Today at 01:42:12 AM »
Not even you can deny there is a literal mountain of evidence in this case,

I absolutely can deny it. Your “mountain” is silly crap like a ring in a cup and calling it “Oswald’s rifle” (LOL).

Quote
the fact that you keep saying/implying the incriminating evidence was fabricated, planted and lied about, is for you to prove

I said nothing of the kind. Your problem is that your “evidence”, even if genuine, does not prove who killed Kennedy.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #14 on: Today at 02:50:01 AM »
Your problem is that your “evidence,” even if genuine, does not prove who killed Kennedy.

If three people had photographed Oswald as he was shooting at JFK from his Sniper's Nest, you would probably claim that their photos, lacking a digital time stamp (or a clock in the background) and a notarized statement in triplicate, were fake.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11148
Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 03:54:24 AM »
If three people had photographed Oswald as he was shooting at JFK from his Sniper's Nest, you would probably claim that their photos, lacking a digital time stamp (or a clock in the background) and a notarized statement in triplicate, were fake.

Cool fantasy, bro.  Almost as creative as your fantasy about Gloria Calvery.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Can we be honest about Oswald's "patsy" statement?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 03:54:24 AM »