I'm convinced - CE 399 is entirely bogus!

[Tom Graves]

You really are one sick puppy, aren't you?

No, but you sure sound like one, Weedyman.

[David Von Pein]

There are many reasons to doubt the SBT...

And there are even more reasons to conclude that the Single-Bullet Theory is true. In fact, after evaluating all of the stuff that I talk about in the links provided HERE, it becomes fairly obvious that it would be virtually impossible for the SBT to NOT be true.

The Zapruder film all but proved that JFK and Connolly [sic] weren't struck by the same bullet (frame 225-268).

~sigh~ The exact opposite is true, of course. Frames 223 to 230 of Abraham Zapruder's film pretty much prove that Kennedy and Connally were definitely hit by the same bullet, as discussed at length HERE and HERE.

[Jon Banks]

No, Banks, it's you that's bogus in the sense that you're full of beans and KGB* disinformation, whether you realize it or not.

You really should talk to a therapist about your Boomer KGB paranoia. 

You don't happen to remember the other guy's name, do you?

I forgot his name so I looked it up.

"Sam Kinney" is the name of the deceased SS agent who had a similar story about bringing a bullet to Parkland hospital:

I don't believe CE399 ended up at Parkland by chance. I believe someone placed it on a stretcher. Whether it was Landis or Kinney, I don't know.

Between these SS stories and the glaring Chain of custody problems, we can reasonably doubt that CE399 is the bullet that struck both Kennedy and Connolly (if they were struck by the same bullet). It may not even be the bullet that was found on a stretcher at Parkland.

[Jon Banks]

And there are even more reasons to conclude that the Single-Bullet Theory is true. In fact, after evaluating all of the stuff that I talk about in the links provided HERE, it becomes fairly obvious that it would be virtually impossible for the SBT to NOT be true.

With all due respect (I do respect your opinion even though I'm not convinced on the SBT), given the botched JFK autopsy and contradictory accounts of JFK's wound locations, I don't believe we can confidently theorize bullet trajectories and conclude based on potentially inaccurate information that Kennedy and JBC were struck by the same bullet.

To me it's garbage in-garbage out if we can't know for certain the precise locations of Back and Throat wounds.

I have other reasons for doubting the SBT but the inconclusiveness of the medical evidence is the biggest for me personally.

[Jack Nessan]

There are many reasons to doubt the SBT, which was invented only after it became clear that at least one shot missed the limo entirely. The initial FBI investigation didn't assume that JFK and Connolly were struck by the same bullet.


The Zapruder film all but proved that JFK and Connolly weren't struck by the same bullet (frame 225-268).

Zapruder film all but proved? Pretty convincing.

A shot missed and separate bullets wounding JFK and JBC. How many shots are in this scenario?

Seriously, how was JBC wounded without the bullet first passing through JFK? Where was that shooter located?

 

[Jon Banks]

Zapruder film all but proved? Pretty convincing.

A shot missed and separate bullets wounding JFK and JBC. How many shots are in this scenario?

At least four shots fired of course. Which means there had to be more than one shooter. 

Hence the necessity of the SBT to the Warren Commish after it was confirmed that at least one shot missed the motorcade.

Initially, the FBI didn't account for a missed shot.

[Jack Nessan]

At least four shots fired of course. Which means there had to be more than one shooter. 

Hence the necessity of the SBT to the Warren Commish after it was confirmed that at least one shot missed the motorcade.

Initially, the FBI didn't account for a missed shot.

4+? How was it confirmed a shot missed?

[John Mytton]

You really should talk to a therapist about your Boomer KGB paranoia. 



I forgot his name so I looked it up.

"Sam Kinney" is the name of the deceased SS agent who had a similar story about bringing a bullet to Parkland hospital:

I don't believe CE399 ended up at Parkland by chance. I believe someone placed it on a stretcher. Whether it was Landis or Kinney, I don't know.

Between these SS stories and the glaring Chain of custody problems, we can reasonably doubt that CE399 is the bullet that struck both Kennedy and Connolly (if they were struck by the same bullet). It may not even be the bullet that was found on a stretcher at Parkland.

"Sam Kinney" is the name of the deceased SS agent who had a similar story about bringing a bullet to Parkland hospital:

Even you must admit that story is absolutely bonkers, without a thorough investigation of the crime scene, and knowing the full extent of the injury to Kennedy and the injury to Connally, there is NO way to know what type of bullet to bring because of so many random variable factors.

What if an extra bullet turned up?
How at that stage could any one possibly know the true extent of the injuries?
How could they know to flatten CE399 on only one side?
How could they know only a small amount of lead was left in Connally?
How could they know to remove a small amount of lead from CE399 to equal the small amount of lead in Connally?

Here are some random bullets, which one to choose? Hmmm?

The one with one side flattened?
The one with missing lead?
The one with not so much missing lead?
The one with the deformed nose?



JohnM