One fly in the ointment is that in 1967 when Tink Thompson interviewed Wright, Wright insisted the found bullet had been a pointy-tipped hunting slug just like the one he weirdly produced from his desk drawer. Anyone can make of this what they will, but it seems just a bit unlikely that the found bullet was just as "pristine" as CE 399 but was not CE 399.
It "seems unlikely". Brilliant rebuttal.
A second fly in the ointment, more relevant here, is that in 2002 an aged Odum denied to Thompson and Aguilar that he had ever gone to Parkland and shown CE 399 to Tomlinson and Wright as CE 2011 states. As far as I know, there was no follow up before Odum died in 2010. This of course is fodder for CT theorizing, but all it really suggests is that CE 2011 may have been in error and someone else may have gone to Parkland on June 12, 1964. (We do not know who wrote CE 2011.)
It also "suggests" that the entire thing was fabricated. Particularly since CE 2011 is an anonymously written third-hand account.
