What else does Iacoletti not believe?

[Jack Trojan]

Trojan Horse,

Do you think the sniper shot from the roof (or an upper floor) of the DalTex building to closely approximate the trajectories of "Patsy Oswald's" ostensible shots -- in particular the Z-222 - Z-224 "Magic Bullet" shot?

Do you think that the bullet or bullets he or she fired had already been fired through Oswald's short-rifle and were fired again as sabot rounds?

Or . . . do you think he or she fired ice bullets, and that the bullet fragments that were found inside the limo (and CE-399 which was found inside Parkland Hospital) were planted?

If so, how were they able to deform CE-399 in such a way that correlated so well to the non-headshot wounds to JFK and JBC?

Do you think . . . . 

Aww, never mind.

I think the throat wound is a shot from the front that entered JFK's throat at C7 and smashed thru his T1 vertebrae and sent fragments out his back at T1 and lower.

http://www.kohlbstudio.com/Images/JFK_AMBT2.png

Looks like there are a few wounds back there. But I don't expect you to agree with me since you are a staunch denialist at heart. 

[John Mytton]

LOL. Funny that you think your graphic proves something or that it is accurate. Both those trajectories are ABOVE the shoulders, which is not where the T1 vertebrae is located. The hole in the back suggested the bullet entered at T1. The hole in the throat implied it exited at the C7 vertebrae. Even the WC conceded this. I believe they said it exited at C6, which is why they moved the back wound up higher. However, at a 17 degree declination you don't have to be an expert to know that's impossible.

Here is proof that the bullet smashed thru the T1 vertebrae and must have exited at the T1 vertebrae or lower and not at C7 (providing you believe the xray):

http://www.kohlbstudio.com/Images/x-ray_mb.gif

Your trajectory doesn't show that because your perspective of JFK is too high to apply a 17 degree angle from that POV, and the old reenactment didn't use lasers. Consequently, both your trajectories are above the shoulders and do not show a 17 degree angle at the C6 vertebrae, where it must have been to exit at C7. That's just simple math that cannot be fudged with a bogus graphic or a flawed reenactment.

Your only hope of proving your case is to show me using a 2 laser reenactment like the following then match up the wounds and post your results.

http://www.kohlbstudio.com/Images/JFK_2lasers.png

Don't fudge like the last guy that posted his bogus results. You LNers are such cheaters!

    

JackT

Both those trajectories are ABOVE the shoulders...

For someone who claims to be a "photogrammetrist" you have a poor understanding of perspective and trigonometry!

The hole in the back suggested the bullet entered at T1. The hole in the throat implied it exited at the C7 vertebrae.

I don't need to guess where the underlying vertebrae are, you just have to open your eyes and see where the entry and exit holes are. Doh!

Your only hope of proving your case is to show me using a 2 laser reenactment like the following then match up the wounds and post your results.

http://www.kohlbstudio.com/Images/JFK_2lasers.png

How many time have you posted this experiment? As I have said a bazillion times before "just do it" and then we can analyse your results.

JohnM

[Tom Graves]

I think the throat wound is a shot from the front that entered JFK's throat at C7 and smashed thru his T1 vertebrae and sent fragments out his back at T1 and lower.

I don't expect you to agree with me since you are a staunch denialist at heart.

Trojan Horse,

It is you, not I, who is a denialist.

Question: Why do you have such a deep psychological need to believe that the evil, evil, evil CIA killed JFK?

Answer: Because you've been zombified by sixty-six years (it started in 1959) of KGB* disinformation, "active measures," and mole-based "Inside Man" / "Outside Man" strategic deception counterintelligence operations waged against the CIA, the FBI, and the intelligence services of our NATO allies.

*Today's SVR and FSB